Former Chilean President Michelle Bachelet acknowledged on Thursday the difficulties facing her candidacy for United Nations secretary-general. Asked at a public event in Santiago why she wants to lead the organization, she replied in a light tone: “That's what I ask myself. Perhaps because I know I'm not going to be secretary-general.”
The remark came at a panel discussion on migration organized by Diego Portales University, two weeks after the Security Council's second informal poll, held on August 21. The polls are secret and the Council's rotating presidency confirmed the vote without releasing results. According to the digital outlet PassBlue, which specializes in United Nations coverage, Bachelet recorded the sharpest decline among the eight contenders: she went from six “encourage” votes in July to two, with six “discourage” and seven abstentions, placing her seventh, ahead only of Ecuador's Ivonne A-Baki, nominated by Tonga on August 17.
In that same poll, Guyana's Carolyn Rodrigues Birkett topped the field with eight “encourage” votes, followed by Costa Rica's Rebeca Grynspan and Argentina's Rafael Grossi, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, with seven each. The field is completed by Senegal's Macky Sall, Uganda's Olara Otunnu and Ecuador's María Fernanda Espinosa. No candidate reached the nine favorable votes needed to establish a clear lead.
Bachelet, 74, who served as UN High Commissioner for Human Rights between 2018 and 2022, was nominated in February by Brazil, Chile and Mexico. Chile withdrew its backing in late March, during the first weeks of José Antonio Kast's government. Her candidacy has since rested on support from Brasília and Mexico City, reaffirmed last week in meetings with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum and Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. The United States has criticized her bid, particularly over her position on reproductive rights.
On the state of the organization, Bachelet said the United Nations “has stopped being relevant because other options have been taken,” which she described as “unilateral or minilateral,” citing the case of Iran, where she said the organization is not directly involved. She said her proposal centered on a reform addressing funding: “The United States contributes 22% of the regular budget, and China, which started at 4%, is at 20%, but the United States has not paid for four years and China is generally late. So the UN is in a liquidity crisis.” She added that within the organization “they are trying to do more with less, but that has a limit.”
Asked about US President Donald Trump's rhetoric on migration and multilateralism, she said that outlook did not originate with him, although “with him it has gained a great deal of force.” “What lies beneath this is a strategic, structural fight; it is not a matter of one administration versus another,” she said, adding that US soft power has declined while China's has grown.
António Guterres's second term ends on December 31, 2026. His successor is expected to be designated before that date.
Top Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesNo comments for this story
Please log in or register (it’s free!) to comment. Login with Facebook
Facts Only
* Michelle Bachelet acknowledged difficulties facing her candidacy for United Nations secretary-general.
* Bachelet replied in a light tone that she asked herself why she wanted to lead the organization, suggesting she might not be secretary-general.
* A poll was conducted on migration by Diego Portales University, two weeks after an informal Security Council poll on August 21.
* Bachelet recorded a decline in support among candidates: six "encourage" votes in July to two, with six "discourage" and seven abstentions.
* Carolyn Rodrigues Birkett led the poll with eight "encourage" votes; Rebeca Grynspan and Rafael Grossi followed with seven votes each.
* Bachelet was nominated in February by Brazil, Chile, and Mexico; Chile withdrew its backing in late March.
* Bachelet stated the United Nations has stopped being relevant because other options have been taken, citing unilateral actions like Iran's case.
* Bachelet cited a funding issue: the United States contributes 22% of the budget, and China's contribution is at 20%, with payment delays noted.
* The outlook on migration stems from a structural fight between powers rather than specific administrations.
Executive Summary
Full Take
The framing of Bachelet’s self-reflection—“Perhaps because I know I'm not going to be secretary-general”—functions as a form of deflection, shifting the focus from concrete political maneuvering to existential doubt. This maneuver attempts to mitigate the visible instability caused by the decline in poll support and external criticism, pivoting the narrative toward internal philosophical uncertainty rather than policy performance. The data concerning the stark drop in support reveals a significant divergence between stated intent and external consensus among potential leaders; candidates like Birkett demonstrated clear leading momentum while Bachelet experienced a severe reduction.
The discussion of the UN's relevance as "unilateral or minilateral" points toward a systemic failure in multilateral governance, where existing structures are perceived as obsolete rather than reformed. The emphasis on liquidity crisis and unequal financial contributions suggests that the structural challenges within the organization are inextricably linked to geopolitical power dynamics, particularly concerning the US and China. The assertion that the fight over migration is a "strategic, structural fight" rather than an administrative one correctly identifies that contemporary crises are rooted in power asymmetries, which influences how internal legitimacy is perceived.
The pattern observed is the attempt by high-profile figures to manage uncertainty through semantic retreat; when faced with quantitative decline (poll results) and external pressure (US criticism), the response is a rhetorical pivot toward existential questioning. The implication for agency is that public figures must navigate accountability not just for their stated goals, but for the coherence between those goals and the measurable realities of institutional dynamics and geopolitical power shifts. What factors actually drive the liquidity crisis beyond simple payment delays, and how might reform efforts address the asymmetry that fuels this perceived irrelevance?
Sentinel — Human
The text functions as standard geopolitical reporting, synthesizing specific poll data, biographical context, and high-level policy commentary effectively.