Skip to content
Chimera readability score 0.607 out of 100, reading level.

Multiple Authors
03.13.26Multiple Authors
13.03.2026 | 3:51pmClimate change, war and mismanagement are putting Iran’s water supply under major strain, experts have warned.
The Middle Eastern country has faced years of intense drought, which scientists have found was made more intense due to human-caused climate change.
In recent years, Iranian citizens have protested against the government’s management of water supplies, pointing the blame at decades of poor planning and shortsighted policies.
As water supplies ran low, authorities warned last year that several of Iran’s major cities – including the capital, Tehran – could soon face “water day zero”, when a city’s water service is turned off and existing supplies rationed.
Meanwhile, recent air strikes on desalination plants in Iran and Bahrain are driving wider questions about how the war might exacerbate water insecurity across the Middle East.
One expert tells Carbon Brief the conflict is “straining an already-fragile [water] system” within Iran.
In this article, Carbon Brief looks at how conflict is combining with climate change and unsustainable use to place pressure on Iran’s water supplies.
- How close are Iran’s major cities to a ‘water day zero’?
- What role is climate change playing?
- What other factors are involved?
- How could attacks on desalination plants impact water supplies in the Middle East?
- What policies could help Iran avoid a ‘water day zero’?
How close are Iran’s major cities to a ‘water day zero’?
Iran is one of the most water-stressed countries in the world and is currently in the grips of an unprecedented, multi-year drought.
The country’s hot and dry climate means that freshwater is scarce. However, many Iranian citizens also blame decades of government mismanagement for the present-day water shortages.
In January, the Guardian explained that over multiple decades, Iranian officials abandoned the country’s “qanat aquifer system”, which consists of tens of thousands of tunnels dug into hillsides across the country that lead to underground water storage. This system has been “supplying [Iran’s] cities and agriculture with freshwater for millennia”, the newspaper said.
To replace the aquifer system, the government built dozens of dams over the second half of the 20th century, which together hold around a quarter of the country’s total water resource, according to the Guardian. However, it added:
“But by putting major dams on rivers too small to sustain them, the authorities brought short-term relief at the cost of longer-term water loss: evaporation from reservoirs increased while upland areas were deprived of water, now trapped behind the dams.”
Yale Environment 360 noted in December that “in the past half century, around half of Iran’s qanats have been rendered waterless through poor maintenance or as pumped wells have lowered water tables within hillsides”.
Agriculture is responsible for 90% of Iran’s water use. Over 2003-19, Iran lost around 211 cubic kilometres of groundwater – around twice the country’s annual water consumption – largely due to unregulated water pumping for farming.
The images below show how Lake Urmia in the north-west of the country – once the largest lake in the Middle East – has almost completely dried up since 2001 as water that feeds that lake has been diverted.
Towards the end of 2025, Iran’s Meteorological Organisation warned that the main dams supplying drinking water to major cities, such as Tehran, Tabriz and Mashhad, were close to “water day zero”.
The term “water day zero” has been used by academics, media and governments to describe the moment when a city or region’s municipal water supply becomes so depleted that authorities have to turn off taps and implement water rationing. It has been used to describe water crises in Cape Town, South Africa and Chennai, India.
In a televised national address in November, Iranian president Masoud Pezeshkian reportedly said the government had “no other choice” but to relocate the capital due to “extreme pressure” on water, land and infrastructure systems.
(This came after the government announced in January it would relocate its capital to the southern coastal region of Makran, citing Tehran’s enduring overpopulation, power shortages and water scarcity.)
Tehran is home to 10 million people and consumes nearly a quarter of Iran’s water supplies.
The water shortages have fuelled nation-wide protests, which have been often-violently suppressed by the government.
Prof Kaveh Madani, former deputy vice-president of Iran and the director of the UN University Institute for Water, Environment and Health, tells Carbon Brief that recent rainfall means the threat of “water day zero” has subsided in Iran in recent months.
However, he stresses that a combination of climate change and “local human factors” mean “many, many places in Iran are in ‘water bankruptcy’ mode”.
“Water bankruptcy” is when water systems have been overused to the point they can no longer meet demand without causing irreversible damage to the environment, according to Madani’s own research.
What role is climate change playing?
Iran is currently facing its sixth year of consecutive drought conditions.
An update posted in November by the National Iranian American Council quoted Mohsen Ardakani – managing director of Tehran Water and Wastewater Company – as saying:
“We are entering our sixth consecutive drought year. Since the start of the 2025-26 water year (about a month ago), not a single drop of rain has fallen anywhere in the country.”
The country’s most recent “water year”, which ran from September 2024 to September 2025, was one of the driest on record. Over the 12-month period, the country recorded 81% less rainfall than the historical average.
Meanwhile, temperatures in Iran can soar above 50C in the hot season, pushing the limits of human survivability and exacerbating water loss through evaporations from reservoirs of water.
Multiple attribution studies have shown that climate change is making the country’s hot and dry conditions more intense and likely.
In 2023, the World Wealth Attribution service (WWA) carried out an analysis on the drought conditions in Iran over 2020-23.
This study investigated agricultural drought, which focuses on the difference between rainfall amounts and levels of evapotranspiration from soils and plants.
The study explored how often a drought of a similar intensity would have occurred in a world without warming and how often it could occur in the climate of 2023. The researchers found that the drought would have been a one-in-80 year event without global warming, but a one-in-five year event in 2023’s climate.
They added that if the planet continues to heat, reaching a warming level of 2C above pre-industrial temperatures, Iran could expect a drought of 2023’s severity, on average, every other year.
The graphic below illustrates these results, where a pink dot indicates the number of years in every 81 with an event like the 2020-23 drought over Iran.
The box on the left shows how often such a drought would be expected in a pre-industrial climate, in which there is no human-driven warming. The box in the centre shows 2023’s climate, which has warmed 1.2C as a result of human-caused climate change. The box on the right shows a world in which the climate is 2C warmer than in the pre-industrial period.
Two years later, WWA carried out another study on drought in Iran, this time focusing on the five-year drought over 2021-25. The authors found an “even stronger impact” of climate change than their previous analysis.
A range of other attribution studies for Iran over the past five years have concluded that climate change made heatwaves and droughts over the region more intense and likely.
Meanwhile, the World Meteorological Organization’s (WMO’s) “state of the climate in the Arab region 2024” report warned about the impact of climate change on water security across the region.
In a statement, WMO secretary general Prof Celeste Saulo warned that “droughts are becoming more frequent and severe in one of the world’s most water-stressed regions”.
What other factors are involved?
Climate change is not the only – or even the primary – driver of water scarcity in Iran.
Madani explains:
“We have both the human factors and the climatic factors…A lot of times, local human factors are much more important and significant than the global factors.”
For example, Madani says, the country has experienced large population growth, but its population is concentrated in “a very few large metropolitan” areas, meaning it can struggle to provide enough water to those places. He also points to inefficient agricultural practices and overreliance on technological solutions, including dams and desalination plants.
The vast majority of the country’s water stress comes from its agricultural sector, which accounts for more than 90% of Iran’s water use.
Dr Assem Mayar, an independent researcher focused on water resources and climate security, tells Carbon Brief that Iran’s arid climate means that it uses more water per unit area for cultivating crops than other countries. This issue is compounded by government policies promoting domestic agriculture, he says:
“[Iran’s] government tries to be self-reliant in [the] food sector, which consumes the most share of water in the country.”
Both of the country’s main water sources – surface water and groundwater – are overexploited, Mayar says.
A 2021 study on the drivers of groundwater depletion in Iran found that between 2002 and 2015, Iran’s aquifers were depleted by around 74 cubic kilometres – 1.6 times larger than the amount of water stored in Iran’s largest lake, Lake Urmia, at its highest recorded levels.
The study also found that some basins had experienced depletion rates of up to 2,600% in that timeframe.
Groundwater aquifers naturally “recharge” as water percolates down from the surface. However, a 2023 study also found that this rate of recharge has been declining since the early 2000s.
When groundwater or other resources are extracted from the ground in high quantities, the land above the aquifer can compact and the aquifers themselves can collapse, leading to “subsidence” as the land surface sinks. Iran is one of the countries with the largest subsidence rates in the world, according to a 2024 study.
In late 2025, BBC News reported that Iran had begun “cloud seeding” – injecting salt particles into clouds to promote condensation, in an effort to “combat the country’s worst drought in decades”.
The country has been employing the technique since 2008 and reports that rainfall increased by 15% in the targeted areas as a result.
However, this does little to address the root of the problem, experts tell Carbon Brief.
Prof Nima Shokri, director of the Institute of Geo-Hydroinformatics at Hamburg University of Technology, tells Carbon Brief:
“Iran’s water crisis stems primarily from decades of policy choices that prioritised ideological and geopolitical objectives over sustainable resource management. A costly foreign policy posture and prolonged international isolation have limited access to foreign investment, modern technology and diversified economic development.
“Domestically, this has translated into policies that encouraged groundwater-dependent agriculture, expanded irrigated land without enforceable extraction limits, maintained heavy energy and water subsidies and underinvested in wastewater reuse, leakage reduction and monitoring systems.”
How could attacks on desalination plants impact water supplies in the Middle East?
A pair of attacks on desalination plants has led to significant media speculation around how the conflict might exacerbate freshwater supplies, both in Iran and across the Middle East.
On Saturday 7 March, Iran accused the US of attacking a desalination plant on Qeshm Island in the Strait of Hormuz.
Describing the attack on the critical water infrastructure as “blatant and desperate crime”, foreign minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi said water supply in 30 villages had been impacted.
The next day, Bahrain government said Iran had caused “material damage” to one of its desalination plants during a drone attack.
David Michel, senior fellow for water security at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, told the Daily Mail that attacks on water plants in Gulf states by Iran could be designed to “impose costs” that push them to intervene or call for the end of the war.
There has been a boom in desalination across the Middle East in recent decades, as water-scarce countries have turned to the technology – which transforms seawater into freshwater – to boost freshwater supplies.
Collectively, the Middle East accounts for roughly 40% of global desalinated water production, producing 29m cubic metres of water every day, according to a 2026 review. This is shown in the chart below.
Iran has more than 163 desalination plants. However, it is less reliant on these plants than smaller countries in the region with fewer water reserves.
In a 2022 policy paper, the Institut Français des Relations Internationales noted Kuwait, Qatar and Oman sourced 90%, 90% and 86% of drinking water from desalination plants, respectively.
In contrast, an official from Iran’s state-run water company told the Tehran Times in 2022 that just 3% of the country’s drinking water came from desalination plants. (Iran’s water supply is sourced primarily from groundwater and rivers and reservoirs.)
Shrokri says the ongoing conflict is “hitting water security” in Iran through “direct and indirect” attacks on critical infrastructure – including desalination plants, power stations and water networks. He adds:
“The conflict is straining an already fragile system inside Iran. The country entered the war with severe drought, depleted groundwater and shrinking reservoirs, so any disruption to energy systems, industrial facilities or supply chains can quickly cascade into water shortages.”
Shokri also highlights that attacks on desalination plants in the Gulf could have serious consequences for major cities – including Dubai, Doha and Abu Dhabi – “rely heavily” on desalinated seawater for drinking water. He says:
“Without desalination plants, large parts of the region’s modern urban system will struggle to exist. The ripple effects would extend far beyond drinking water. Sanitation systems would begin to fail, public health risks would rise and economic activity could slow dramatically.”
Experts have pointed out that attacks on electricity infrastructure could also impact provision of drinking water, given desalination plants are energy-intensive and often co-located with power plants.
Dr Raha Hakimdavar, a hydrologist at Georgetown University, told Al Jazeera that attacks on desalination plants could also impact domestic food production in the long-term, if groundwater is diverted away from agriculture and towards households.
What policies could help Iran avoid a ‘water day zero’?
Experts tell Carbon Brief that the conflict could make chronic water shortages in Iran more likely – even if hostilities are unlikely to directly force a “water day zero”.
Shokri says:
“The war could accelerate the timeline, but it didn’t create the risk of day zero. Iran’s water system was already under extreme pressure from long-term mismanagement and distorted policy priorities. Conflict simply reduces the margin for error.”
Mayar says the war is “unlikely to force day zero nationwide”, but could bring forward “localised day‑zero conditions in already stressed regions”. These effects could be felt most acutely in Iran’s islands and cities that are already “facing chronic shortages”, he continues.
Since agriculture is such a large contributor to the country’s water usage, potential solutions must focus on that sector, experts say.
Mayar says the government should “phase out subsidy policies that encourage overuse”.
In 2018, researchers at Stanford University released a “national adaptation plan for water scarcity in Iran”, as part of a programme looking at the country’s long-term sustainable development.
That report lays out two sets of adaptation actions: those that work to improve the efficiency of water use and those that end water-intensive activities. Among the specific actions recommended by the report are reusing treated wastewater, reducing irrigated farming and enhancing crop-growing productivity through technological solutions.
The adaptation report concludes:
“The underlying solution to address Iran’s water problem is obvious: consumption should be regulated and reduced, water productivity should be improved and wastewater should be treated and reused in the system.”
Meanwhile, Shokri argues that the “main obstacle” to water reform in Iran is not technical capacity, but “government-set national priorities”. He explains:
“Significant public resources are directed toward non-civil spending and external commitments, leaving limited room for sustained investment in water management and environment…Real progress will require shifting attention and resources toward water security, environmental protection and long-term economic resilience.”

Facts Only

Iran is experiencing its sixth consecutive year of drought, with the 2024-25 water year recording 81% less rainfall than the historical average.
Temperatures in Iran can exceed 50°C, increasing water loss through evaporation.
Agriculture accounts for 90% of Iran’s water use, with unregulated groundwater pumping depleting aquifers by 74 cubic kilometers between 2002 and 2015.
Lake Urmia, once the largest lake in the Middle East, has nearly dried up due to water diversion for agriculture.
Iran’s government replaced traditional qanat aquifer systems with dams, leading to increased evaporation and water loss.
Tehran, home to 10 million people, consumes nearly a quarter of Iran’s water supplies and faces potential relocation due to water scarcity.
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian stated in November that the government had "no other choice" but to relocate the capital due to water, land, and infrastructure pressures.
Iran has over 163 desalination plants, but they supply only 3% of the country’s drinking water.
On March 7, 2026, Iran accused the U.S. of attacking a desalination plant on Qeshm Island, disrupting water supply to 30 villages.
Bahrain reported material damage to one of its desalination plants from an Iranian drone attack on March 8, 2026.
Iran has used cloud seeding since 2008, reporting a 15% increase in rainfall in targeted areas.
Land subsidence in Iran is among the worst globally due to excessive groundwater extraction.

Executive Summary

Iran is facing a severe water crisis driven by climate change, war, and decades of mismanagement. The country has endured six consecutive years of drought, with 2024-25 being one of the driest on record, exacerbated by rising temperatures linked to climate change. Poor government policies, including the abandonment of traditional qanat aquifer systems in favor of inefficient dams and unregulated groundwater extraction for agriculture, have worsened shortages. Agriculture consumes 90% of Iran’s water, with overpumping leading to critical groundwater depletion and land subsidence. Recent attacks on desalination plants in Iran and Bahrain have raised concerns about water security, though Iran relies less on desalination than some Gulf states. Experts warn that without reform—such as reducing agricultural subsidies, improving water efficiency, and investing in wastewater reuse—Iran risks "water day zero" in major cities like Tehran, where 10 million people already face acute shortages. Protests over water scarcity have been met with violent suppression, highlighting the crisis's political and social dimensions.
The conflict in the region further strains Iran’s fragile water infrastructure, with attacks on power and desalination plants threatening cascading failures. While recent rainfall has temporarily eased the immediate threat of "water day zero," long-term solutions require systemic policy shifts, including phasing out water-intensive agriculture and prioritizing sustainable resource management. The crisis underscores broader regional vulnerabilities, as desalination-dependent cities like Dubai and Doha could face catastrophic disruptions if infrastructure is targeted. The interplay of climate change, geopolitical tensions, and historical mismanagement presents a complex challenge with no quick fixes.

Full Take

The strongest version of this narrative highlights a convergence of climate change, geopolitical conflict, and systemic policy failures in Iran’s water crisis. The article credibly ties drought intensity to human-caused climate change, citing attribution studies showing increased frequency and severity of dry conditions. It also effectively documents the role of government mismanagement—such as the shift from qanats to dams and unchecked agricultural water use—in exacerbating scarcity. The inclusion of recent attacks on desalination plants adds a timely geopolitical dimension, underscoring how war can compound existing vulnerabilities. The piece avoids overt emotional manipulation, though the framing of "water day zero" and protests met with violence carries inherent urgency.
Patterns detected: ARC-0024 Ambiguity (the term "water day zero" is used without consistent definition, blending technical and alarmist connotations), ARC-0043 Motte-and-Bailey (the narrative oscillates between climate change as a primary driver and local mismanagement as the root cause, depending on context).
The root cause paradigm here is one of systemic fragility: a state where climate stress intersects with entrenched policy failures and geopolitical instability. The unstated assumption is that technological fixes (dams, desalination, cloud seeding) can compensate for structural overuse, a pattern echoing global trends in resource mismanagement. The narrative implicitly critiques Iran’s self-reliance in food production as a driver of water overuse, but it doesn’t explore alternative economic models or the trade-offs of import dependence.
For human agency, the crisis reveals a tension between top-down policy failures and bottom-up protests, with citizens bearing the costs of both drought and repression. Second-order consequences include potential mass displacement (e.g., relocating Tehran) and regional destabilization if water infrastructure becomes a persistent target in conflict. The focus on Iran also obscures broader regional interdependencies—what happens if Saudi Arabia or the UAE face similar attacks on their desalination-heavy systems?
Bridge questions: How might Iran’s water crisis reshape its domestic politics or foreign policy priorities? What lessons does this hold for other water-stressed nations balancing climate adaptation with economic sovereignty? Would decentralized water management (e.g., reviving qanats) be more resilient than centralized infrastructure in conflict zones?
Counterstrike scan: A coordinated influence campaign would likely amplify the "water day zero" framing to stoke panic, blame climate change exclusively to avoid scrutiny of local governance, or weaponize the desalination attacks to escalate regional tensions. This article avoids such tactics—it presents multiple causal factors, acknowledges policy failures, and contextualizes the attacks without sensationalism. The alignment with a hypothetical attack playbook is minimal; the piece leans toward informative reporting rather than manipulative framing.

Sentinel — Human

Confidence

The article shows strong signs of human authorship, with expert-driven analysis, stylistic variability, and context-specific emphasis unlikely to be generated by AI.

Signals Detected
low severity: Varied sentence length and structure, with some long, complex sentences and others short and direct. No excessive hedging or mechanical transitions.
low severity: Strong narrative flow with clear emphasis on specific issues (e.g., qanats, desalination attacks), suggesting human editorial judgment rather than AI balance.
low severity: Detailed attribution to named experts (e.g., Kaveh Madani, Nima Shokri) and specific studies (WWA, Stanford), reducing template risk.
low severity: No obvious confabulation; historical references (e.g., qanats, Lake Urmia) align with known facts, and claims are sourced.
Human Indicators
Idiosyncratic phrasing (e.g., 'water bankruptcy mode') and nuanced policy critiques (e.g., Shokri's analysis of Iran's geopolitical priorities).
Inclusion of contradictory viewpoints (e.g., rainfall temporarily easing 'day zero' threat but long-term risks remaining).
Structural digressions (e.g., detailed explanation of cloud seeding's limitations) that disrupt formulaic flow.