By Maria Popova
Life is an ongoing dance between the subjective reality of what it feels like to be alive, to tremble with grief, to be glad — what it feels like to be you — and the objective reality of a universe insentient to your hopes and fears, those rudiments of the imagination, the imagination at the heart of consciousness. We are yet to figure out how these two dimensions of being can be integrated into a totality. We are yet to figure out how the known physical laws can cohere with each other — relativity, the physics of the very large, is still at odds with quantum field theory, the physics of the very small — and yet to figure out how those physical laws give rise to the wonder of consciousness.
The urgency of this integration is what the physicist David Bohm (December 20, 1917–October 27, 1992) explores in Wholeness and the Implicate Order (public library).
Bohm — who devoted his life to “understanding the nature of reality in general and of consciousness in particular as a coherent whole, which is never static or complete but which is an unending process of movement and unfoldment” — writes:
To meet the challenge before us our notions of cosmology and of the general nature of reality must have room in them to permit a consistent account of consciousness. Vice versa, our notions of consciousness must have room in them to understand what it means for its content to be “reality as a whole.” The two sets of notions together should then be such as to allow for an understanding of how reality and consciousness are related.
Acknowledging that these immense questions might “never be resolved ultimately and completely” — that they might belong to what Hannah Arendt insisted were the unanswerable questions that make us human — he adds:
Man’s* general way of thinking of the totality, i.e. his general world view, is crucial for overall order of the human mind itself. If he thinks of the totality as constituted of independent fragments, then that is how his mind will tend to operate, but if he can include everything coherently and harmoniously in an overall whole that is undivided, unbroken, and without a border (for every border is a division or break) then his mind will tend to move in a similar way, and from this will flow an orderly action within the whole.
[…]
The way could be opened for a world view in which consciousness and reality would not be fragmented from each other.
A generation after the Swiss philosopher Jean Gebser contoured a view of this unfragmented reality in his notion of “the ever-present origin,” Bohm considers what arriving at such a holistic view would take:
Our general world view is itself an overall movement of thought, which has to be viable in the sense that the totality of activities that flow out of it are generally in harmony, both in themselves and with regard to the whole of existence. Such harmony is seen to be possible only if the world view itself takes part in an unending process of development, evolution, and unfoldment, which fits as part of the universal process that is the ground of all existence.
Such a way of viewing reality, Bohm argues against the grain of our reductionist culture, requires fully inhabiting all aspects of the mind, including those that elude the clutch of quantification:
The proper order of operation of the mind requires an overall grasp of what is generally known not only in formal, logical, mathematical terms, but also intuitively, in images, feelings, poetic usage of language, etc… It is needed for the human mind to function in a generally harmonious way, which could in turn help to make possible an orderly and stable society… This requires a continual flow and development of our general notions of reality.
[…]
A new kind of theory is needed which drops these basic commitments and at most recovers some essential features of the older theories as abstract forms derived from a deeper reality in which what prevails is unbroken wholeness.
In the remainder of Wholeness and the Implicate Order, Bohm goes on explore how the relationship between thought and reality illuminates the way this unbroken wholeness is enfolded within each region of space and time. Complement it with Iain McGilchrist on how we render reality and John Muir on the transcendent interconnectedness of the universe, then revisit Bohm on creativity, the paradox of communication, and how we shape reality.
—
Published August 17, 2026
—
https://www.themarginalian.org/2026/08/17/wholeness-and-the-implicate-order-david-bohm/
—
ABOUT
CONTACT
SUPPORT
SUBSCRIBE
Newsletter
RSS
CONNECT
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Tumblr
Facts Only
* Life involves a dance between subjective reality (feeling alive) and objective reality (the universe).
* There is a challenge in integrating these two dimensions into a totality.
* Physical laws, such as relativity and quantum field theory, are currently in conflict.
* Consciousness is related to the wonder arising from physical laws.
* David Bohm explored this integration in *Wholeness and the Implicate Order*.
* Bohm stated that notions of cosmology and reality must permit an account of consciousness.
* Notions of consciousness must allow for understanding its content as "reality as a whole."
* A holistic view of totality allows the mind to operate in harmony, leading to orderly action.
* The mind requires an overall grasp of reality, including intuitive and poetic usage, for harmonious function.
* A new theory is needed that recovers essential features from older theories as abstract forms derived from unbroken wholeness.
Executive Summary
The text explores the tension between subjective reality (what it feels like to be alive) and objective reality (the universe governed by physical laws), focusing on how consciousness relates to these dimensions. Physicist David Bohm investigates the challenge of integrating these two realities, noting the conflict between established physics (relativity vs. quantum field theory) and the emergence of consciousness. Bohm posits that for a coherent account of reality, notions of cosmology and consciousness must be revised to allow for their integration. He suggests that an undivided, holistic view is necessary for the human mind to operate harmoniously.
Bohm argues that the general way of thinking about totality is crucial for mental order; thinking of reality as independent fragments hinders orderly action, whereas viewing it as an undivided whole permits harmonious movement. Achieving this holistic view requires abandoning reductionist culture and embracing intuitive understanding alongside formal logic. Bohm advocates for a shift in theoretical frameworks that acknowledge unbroken wholeness as the underlying reality from which physical laws and consciousness emerge.
The text concludes by suggesting that future theoretical work needs to incorporate these broader commitments, linking thought and reality through concepts like creativity and the paradox of communication, drawing upon other thinkers like McGilchrist and Muir.
Full Take
The central dynamic presented is the necessary reconciliation between fragmented perceptions and an underlying unified whole, positioning consciousness as the mediator of this integration. The argument pivots on a critique of reductionism, suggesting that current frameworks—both in physics and philosophy—treat reality and experience as separable entities, leading to incoherence. Bohm's insight suggests that the structure of thought itself dictates the perceived structure of reality; fragmentation in the mind reflects fragmentation in the observed world.
The pattern observed is a deep structural necessity for holistic understanding: any functional system, whether physical or cognitive, requires a context where all components are interdependent and unfolded. The resistance to this view stems from cultural embeddedness in quantification and linear logic. The implication is that the search for ultimate truth requires shifting the foundational assumptions of thought away from division toward inclusion.
The move towards Wholeness suggests a meta-level shift: recognizing that the very process of observation and measurement is constrained by the structure of consciousness itself. This aligns with broader philosophical trends attempting to bridge mind-body dualism, but Bohm grounds this integration in an ontological claim—that reality is fundamentally non-fragmented. The missing piece for full understanding lies in how this holistic awareness translates into a concrete epistemology that can withstand empirical testing while honoring the experiential necessity of "being."
Bridge Questions: If the goal is to move toward an undivided whole, what specific epistemological or mathematical tools would need to be developed to describe "unbroken wholeness" in a way that transcends current dualistic frameworks? How does the experience of quantum indeterminacy relate precisely to this 'implicate order,' and where do these concepts intersect with contemporary neuroscience regarding the nature of self-awareness? What are the practical, societal implications of adopting a world view where fragmentation is seen as an error in ordering rather than a feature of reality?
Sentinel — Human
This piece reads as a reflective essay synthesizing complex philosophical ideas from David Bohm, establishing a human-driven exploration rather than a purely synthetic recitation of facts.