Despite a semblance of calm, Maduro’s removal has unsettled the Venezuelan regime. Will Chavismo’s tried and tested combination of coercion and expectation management continue to delay the long-awaited rupture?
The delegitimization of the Spanish judiciary; democratic death by a thousand bites; Trump and the new geometry of power; privatising the body of Franco.
The current issue of Letras Libres, entitled ‘The Siege on Justice’, examines attempts by governments to exert control over the judiciary, from recent controversies in Spain and clashes between Trump and the US judiciary, to the populist capture of institutions in Poland and Hungary.
Natalia Velilla begins he article on the delegitimization of Spain’s justice system with a warning from legal scholar Pablo Antonio Gutiérrez Colantuono: ‘small, constant and deliberate attacks’ can gradually hollow out democracy, ‘reducing it to little more than an empty shell’.
In psychological terms, we become ‘desensitized’: attacks on judges may initially raise alarm, but reactions gradually subside as society grows accustomed to ever-higher levels of aggression and institutional disloyalty. For Velilla, Spain is now at ‘a very dangerous stage in the normalization of risk’, riding an ‘illiberal wave’ towards the practices of populist democracies.
Three polls published in July 2026 point to high levels of distrust in the country’s justice system. Their timing is significant, Velilla argues, coinciding with judicial proceedings involving people close to prime minister Pedro Sánchez and reinforcing a broader strategy of ‘casting doubt’ on the judiciary.
But such attacks predate the current PSOE government. From the PP’s talk of ‘police stitch-ups’ during the Gürtel affair to the Catalan independence movement’s portrayal of judges as instruments of political repression, Velilla traces a delegitimization that has become systematic, with talk of ‘lawfare’, ‘Francoist judges’ and a judicial ‘caste’.
Good judge, bad judge? It all depends on who is in the dock. Potential reforms have been buried beneath the ‘noise’ and political mudslinging. And once the seeds of mistrust have been sown, Velilla warns, they are difficult to uproot – and their fruits, political impunity, readily reaped.
Death by a thousand bites
Veteran journalist Elisa Beni talks to Daniel Gascón about her recent book, Cómo matan (a mordiscos) nuestra democracia (‘How they’re killing our democracy, bite by bite’). Beni argues that democratic erosion begins with apparently trivial breaches of convention, which gradually develop into a deeper undermining of democratic practice. Democracy consists not simply in voting every four years, but in the checks, counterweights and conventions that constrain power. Hence her central maxim: in democracy, ‘form is substance’.
Beni traces this erosion through Spain’s institutions, from the politicization of the General Council of the Judiciary – ‘getting the referee on your side’ – to what she sees as the capture of the Constitutional Court and the degradation of the prosecution service.
Her criticism extends beyond institutions to a growing culture of ideological conformity, which she illustrates through the response to laws such as Spain’s trans law. Those who questioned the prevailing orthodoxy, she argues, faced ‘a new inquisition against those of us who refused to accept that biological sex does not exist’.
Yet Beni ends on a cautiously hopeful note, trusting that ‘whoever governs next will have the guts to reverse course and clean up what has become corrupted’. Spain, she argues, is too close to the brink for inaction to remain an option.
Democratic geometry
Foreign correspondent Alejandra Clements traces the delicate balance between the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the United States. Washington, DC originally formed a near-perfect diamond of almost 260 square kilometres, and within this diamond Clements draws – with Montesquieu’s permission – a triangle between the White House, the Capitol and the Supreme Court.
In the America of 2026 and Trump 2.0, however, this triangle has effectively dissolved into a two-sided power struggle. As Congress ‘teeters on the brink of irrelevance’, Clements argues, Trump has strained the seams of the country’s checks and balances, using executive orders with ‘legislative aspirations’ that threaten to turn the Oval Office into a ‘pseudo-Capitol’.
The judiciary has consequently become the principal check on executive power – but its role is ambiguous. Supreme Court rulings have sometimes strengthened presidential authority and sometimes curtailed it, prompting disagreement over whether the Court is ultimately Trump’s ‘check or ally’. Lower courts, too, have pushed back against executive overreach.
For Clements, the judiciary has become the great ‘stress test’ of American democracy. By acting as a constitutional bulwark, judges are putting this ‘democratic geometry’ of checks and balances into practice: preserving the proper relationship between the branches within Washington’s imperfect diamond – and, ultimately, protecting that other imperfect diamond, democracy itself.
Franco’s body
Josu de Miguel takes a wholly different look at how the law can be made to serve political ends – in this case, to settle the fate of a dictator’s body. More than forty years after his death, Spanish caudillo Francisco Franco was exhumed by means of a decreto-ley – a fast-track legal instrument reserved for situations of ‘extraordinary and urgent necessity’. ‘Our treatment of political bodies is also unique, like our Transition’, de Miguel notes.
He first surveys the treatment of political leaders’ bodies across Europe, before offering a sweeping vista of theories of the body politic, from John of Salisbury to Ernst Kantorowicz. In particular, de Miguel contrasts the enduring institution of kingship with the intensely personal – and religiously inflected – authority of Franco’s dictatorship, which could not survive him. In the context of fascism, de Miguel writes, ‘the king is dead, long live the king’ might instead become ‘after the dictator, the deluge’.
In 2018, Sánchez’s government argued that Franco’s continued presence in the Valley of the Fallen prevented the effective implementation of the 2007 Historical Memory Law, using a decreto-ley to exhume and reinter his remains in a family mausoleum. De Miguel is sceptical of the supposed urgency. But while ‘privatizing’ Franco’s body proved achievable, escaping the ‘Francocene’ – Franco’s continuing centrality as a reference point in Spanish political culture – may prove considerably harder.
Review by Cadenza Academic Translations
Published 25 September 2026
Original in English
First published by Eurozine
© Eurozine
PDF/PRINTNewsletter
Subscribe to know what’s worth thinking about.
Related Articles
The new infinity
Merkur 4/2026
The challenge of regulating AI when it cannot be defined; AI and the devaluation of work; AI and the future of productivity; why engineered anthropomorphism is here to stay.
Facts Only
* The delegitimization of the Spanish justice system is examined.
* Pablo Antonio Gutiérrez Colantuono warned that small, constant attacks can hollow out democracy.
* Psychological desensitization occurs as society grows accustomed to aggression and institutional disloyalty.
* Three polls published in July 2026 indicate high levels of distrust in the country’s justice system.
* Attacks on the judiciary predate the current PSOE government, referencing incidents like the Gürtel affair and the Catalan independence movement.
* Democratic erosion begins with trivial breaches of convention that develop into deeper undermining of democratic practice.
* Erosion is traced through the politicization of the General Council of the Judiciary and the capture of the Constitutional Court.
* Elisa Beni argues in democracy, "form is substance."
* The role of the judiciary in the US is analyzed concerning the balance between executive, legislative, and judicial branches.
* Josu de Miguel discusses exhuming Franco's body using a decreto-ley.
Executive Summary
The situation in Spain involves concerns over the delegitimization of the judiciary, driven by perceived governmental attempts to exert control over judicial bodies. Legal scholar Pablo Antonio Gutiérrez Colantuono warns that small, constant attacks can erode democracy, and psychological concepts suggest societal desensitization to institutional aggression. This erosion is traced through historical examples involving the judiciary, such as the Catalan independence movement's portrayal of judges and past political scandals. The context extends to a broader trend involving "lawfare" and the existence of a judicial "caste."
Further analysis points to a broader democratic erosion where trivial breaches of convention gradually lead to deeper undermining of democratic practice, emphasizing that form is substance in democracy. This process includes the politicization of judicial councils and the degradation of oversight bodies. Despite these systemic challenges, there is a cautious note regarding the possibility of future course correction, contingent on leadership willing to reverse established trends.
The dynamics of power are also examined through the lens of the American judiciary, where external political shifts have strained traditional checks and balances. The role of the judiciary is shown to be critical in testing the "democratic geometry" between branches, functioning as a check on executive power amid evolving political landscapes. Finally, the treatment of historical figures, such as Franco, illustrates how legal mechanisms can be employed to manage political memory and cultural centrality, raising questions about the nature of institutional change versus historical inertia.
Full Take
The narrative constructs a pervasive theme: institutional legitimacy is fragile, susceptible to incremental erosion that exploits psychological vulnerabilities. The reference to "death by a thousand bites" frames systemic decay not as sudden rupture but as a slow, normalized process of delegitimization facilitated by semantic and procedural manipulation—the creation of a judicial caste through concepts like lawfare. This pattern suggests that resistance often hinges on recognizing the subtle ways in which established norms are redefined, rather than confronting overt acts of aggression.
The juxtaposition of Spanish institutional critique (Velilla, Beni) with the analysis of American political geometry (Clements) and legal history (de Miguel) reveals a transnational concern: how abstract structures of power—be they judicial systems, constitutional frameworks, or historical memory—are manipulated to enforce specific regimes of control. The implication is that democratic resilience depends not just on formal checks and balances, but on the public's capacity to perceive and resist the gradual normalization of risk and institutional drift.
A critical tension emerges between inertia and agency. While the text notes that mistrust is difficult to uproot, it offers a tempered hope that future governance might choose reversal. The pattern is one where deep structural challenges are masked by focusing on immediate, observable political conflicts. To understand this system, one must interrogate whether the focus remains fixed on external political maneuvers while ignoring the internal, internalized processes of consent and institutional self-regulation. What mechanisms exist for fostering a critical distance from the very norms being contested?
Sentinel — Human
This text functions as high-level intellectual synthesis, expertly weaving legal, psychological, and geopolitical arguments around core themes of institutional erosion, reflecting sophisticated human editorial judgment.
