Hailey Welch, the online social media influencer, popularly known as the “Hawk Tuah girl,” said that the implosion of the “HAWK” memecoin, which she promoted in 2024, and the ensuing social backlash “traumatized” her.
“I got talked into doing something that I didn't know anything about, really, but you've got to be really careful what you put your name on,” Welsh told Andrew Callaghan of the Channel 5 YouTube channel on Friday.
Welsh said she fully cooperated with a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) probe in 2025, which cleared her of any wrongdoing, and that she did not possess any of the funds from the memecoin launch, nor did she have the technical expertise to launch the coin.
She added that the total amount lost by “real people” in the botched memecoin release was not significant, with her lawyer estimating the total dollar amount lost by retail investors at about $200,000.
Despite this, Welsh said she received death threats and attempted to keep a low profile for months after the incident, which took a toll on her mental health. She said:
“I was starting to get death threats and everything else. People telling me I owe them all this money, and I'm like, ‘I didn't do this.’ I'm sitting here, and I'm the one getting hit for this. It's rough. It's one of those things where if you come out of the house, you put your head down.”
However, not everyone was convinced by Welsh’s comments. “No one should feel bad for the ‘trauma,’” onchain sleuth ZachXBT said.
“She starts posting about meme coins. The entirety of [crypto Twitter] tells her ‘do not launch a token.’ She launches a memecoin anyway, and after, she blames partners and disappears off social media, with followers losing funds,” he added.
Related: Japan PM Takaichi disavows ‘Sanae Token’ after memecoin hits $28M peak
The HAWK memecoin crashes and burns shortly after arrival
The HAWK memecoin launched in December 2024 and surged to a market capitalization of over $490 million mere hours after going live.
Hawk collapsed by over 91% the following day, falling to a market cap of about $41 million, and was widely characterized as a rug pull.
In December 2024, an investor lawsuit was filed against the team and entities that created and managed the memecoin launch, but not Welsh, alleging that the entities sold unregistered securities.
Magazine: Memecoin degeneracy is funding groundbreaking anti-aging research
Facts Only
Actors: Hailey Welch (social media influencer), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
Events: Launch and collapse of HAWK memecoin, FBI investigation
Dates: 2024 (December - ongoing)
Locations: Not specified
Entities: HAWK memecoin team, retail investors
Executive Summary
Full Take
Steelman: The article presents Hailey Welch as a social media influencer who cooperated with an FBI investigation following the collapse of the HAWK memecoin. The memecoin's launch and subsequent crash resulted in significant losses for retail investors, and Welch received death threats and maintained a low profile due to the backlash.
Patterns detected: ARC-0024 Ambiguity (The article does not clearly establish Welch's role in the memecoin launch or her knowledge of the potential risks)
Root Cause: The rise and fall of the HAWK memecoin can be seen as a symptom of the speculative and unregulated nature of cryptocurrencies, particularly memecoins, and the influence of social media personalities on investment decisions.
Implications: The incident raises questions about the ethical responsibilities of social media influencers promoting cryptocurrencies and the risks associated with investing in memecoins. It also highlights the potential for significant financial losses when participating in such speculative markets.
Bridge Questions: What role did Hailey Welch play in the launch of the HAWK memecoin? To what extent should social media influencers be held accountable for promoting risky investments? How can investors protect themselves from losses due to memecoin rug pulls?
Sentinel — Human
The article appears to be written by a human, with varying sentence lengths, passionate framing, and specific legal and financial details supporting this assessment. However, a low confidence score is the normal, healthy result as most articles are human-written.