Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily.
It’s only been six months since I updated readers on Katseye, the incredibly popular, yet seemingly incredibly cursed, global pop girl group whose debut was marked by a Netflix documentary. At our last check-in, Eyekons (the name for Katseye’s fanbase) had been shocked by a press release announcing that one of the group’s six members, Manon Bannerman, would go on a “temporary hiatus” to “focus on her health and wellbeing”—a generic statement that was seemingly almost immediately contradicted by Bannerman’s own cryptic message, which claimed, “I’m healthy, I’m okay, and I’m taking care of myself.” The lack of clarity surrounding the entire ordeal cast a weighty skepticism on the group as a whole, as well as its management companies, South Korea’s Hybe and America’s Geffen Records.
Since then, the skepticism and scrutiny have only increased. While nothing has changed with Bannerman’s “temporary” hiatus, leaving her fate in the group uncertain, everything else surrounding Katseye has dramatically shifted, potentially for the worse. The group’s recent musical output—led by a trio of divisive singles titled “Pinky Up,” “Animal,” and “Hootie Frutti”—has been heavily criticized, while their go-to choreographer has been widely mocked on the internet. If that weren’t enough, two more members have taken leaves of absence of varying lengths from the group, engendering a host of internet jokes made at the expense of the measly three members who were left to do the promotional work for the group’s third EP, WILD, which was released earlier this month.
The situation is, in a word, shambolic. But is this just a temporary setback for Katseye, or is the sextet (at least, what is supposed to be a sextet) looking down the barrel at their early demise as a musical act? And will their listeners—whoever they may be—stick around through all this drama? If you’ve been wondering what’s going on with the most prominent girl group in the Western hemisphere, I’m here to answer your questions.
Remind me: Where are we with Manon Bannerman again?
Bannerman is still on hiatus, whatever that means in this context. She has not been participating in official Katseye activities, including the recording and release of their new EP, although sightings of her at fashion shows and public events at least confirm that she’s still up and around. Her fans continue to support her, amid as-yet-unsubstantiated theories that some kind of mistreatment or discord took place to push Bannerman—who is Swiss Ghanaian, and the only Black member of Katseye—out of the group. In interviews, her fellow members have also spoken about their support and love for Bannerman with no additional news, in line with the contents of their new documentary, Katseye: Wild Hearts, which showcases the Katseye members reacting to Manon’s hiatus by showering her in praise without sharing actual information about her eventual departure or return.
OK … You mentioned that two other members have taken leaves of absence? What’s the deal with that?
On Aug. 7, Katseye’s management announced that the group’s leader, Sophia Laforteza, will be “temporarily unable to participate in upcoming promotional activities,” citing the goal of prioritizing her “mental health and wellness.” The announcement—much longer than the one published for Bannerman earlier this year—also mentioned that Laforteza “has been receiving the utmost support” including “consultations with medical professionals” who advised her to take some time off. The company’s statement also includes a soft date for her potential return, pledging that their management will “reassess” Laforteza’s “condition” in September, promising an update for fans at that time.
Then, a mere 10 days later, a third group member, Megan Skiendiel, wrote to fans stating that she was “feeling a bit under the weather,” warning that she intended to “take the day to take care” of herself and rest. Her break was essentially the equivalent of Skiendiel taking a few sick days: On Aug. 20, three days later, Skiendiel announced that she would be back and active in promotional activities.
The rapid decrease in working members, along with visual proof of physical gaps in dance formations where members ought to be during live performances, resulted in a number of jokes that ran wild on social media. It became something of a meme to announce that you, a regular-degular person, were also “announcing your hiatus from Katseye.”
Yikes! Seems like they’re dropping like flies!
They both are and aren’t. The news about both Laforteza and Skiendiel’s breaks was vastly different from the vague company statement surrounding Bannerman’s break, which included neither a promise that Bannerman was receiving “support” for her alleged health and well-being, nor a date—soft or otherwise—to reassess her condition or update fans. Where Bannerman’s break was officially dubbed a larger “hiatus,” Laforteza’s was simply framed as, specifically, a temporary inability to join in on the recent promotional activities. Then there’s the wide disparity between the girls’ responses. Where Bannerman seemed to be shadily providing a counternarrative to the official announcement, Laforteza’s longer personal apology to fans seemed to echo everything the official announcement of her hiatus stipulated.
So, yes, while the Katseye house definitely seems to need some cleaning up, I wouldn’t go so far as to say that the news surrounding Bannerman is anything like the news surrounding Laforteza or Skiendiel. I don’t even think Laforteza’s news should be that alarming. Idols, especially those trained by the K-pop machine or something similar, as Katseye’s have been, are often worked to the bone. They’re constantly putting out new music, staging comebacks less than a year out from their previous release, and flying to multiple different countries to perform while also appearing for brand deals in between. It’s incessant, difficult work! More idols should be encouraged to take mental health breaks if they need them—this should be commonplace in the industry, not cause for alarm.
I just wish that the hiatuses had unfolded differently. The longer Bannerman’s hiatus has gone unremarked upon, the more the scrutiny on Katseye has intensified. Because fans have no sense of rhyme or reason for Bannerman’s absence, they’ve been overanalyzing the words and behavior of the members, looking for any clue that could point to what’s going on with Bannerman. The remaining girls are overly criticized for their performances, or for seemingly having free time, when so much of the Bannerman speculation assumes that Bannerman was ousted for doing the same. And, though it is the group’s management that holds the keys to Katseye’s future, it’s ultimately the individual members who have to unfairly and publicly answer for and bear the brunt of Eyekons’ feelings of personal affront and indignance. By keeping mum on Bannerman, management might think they’re protecting the members, but the complete opposite has become true, making it unsurprising that Laforteza would need to step back for a bit. It all feels like an utter failure of management.
There is a lot of scrutiny—and mockery, too. Isn’t making fun of Katseye all that people do on the internet these days?
You’re not wrong about the Katseye ribbing. Ever since the immense success that was “Gnarly,” a song that was initially despised by fans but turned into the group’s biggest hit to date, Katseye has continued to churn out similar-sounding music. Singles like “Internet Girl,” “Pinky Up,” and their most recent single “Hootie Frutti”—a Brazilian Phonk song, despite none of the members being Brazilian or speaking fluent Portuguese—fit into an oeuvre that is often mockingly referred to by smashing together a series of nonsense Gen Z trend names and Katseye lyrics, like “Labubu fried chicken” music, or “Dubai chocolate Labubu slime boba tea” slop, or one of my favorites, “matcha Labubu Socrates Tesla” lyrics—because I, too, am still astonished that they mentioned to work “Socrates” into one of their lyrics. It doesn’t help that Katseye’s music videos are notorious for pretty overt product placement, like a boba tea mention matching the lyrics to “Gnarly,” or, significantly more bafflingly, a Tic Tac and a slime promo placement in “Hootie Frutti.”
The difference between these tracks, though, is that “Gnarly” was intentionally ironic, especially considering it was written by Alice Longyu Gao, a Chinese musician and performance artist known for her role as a witty pioneer of hyperpop. But that irony was lost in its translation to a mainstream pop act, and in its aftermath, many listeners feel that the creative powers behind Katseye saw the popularity of “Gnarly” and took the wrong lesson from it by further leaning into less, shall we say, artful music. This is compounded by the apparent gap between Katseye’s output and the members’ talent. As anyone who saw the Pop Star Academy Netflix documentary can attest to, these girls are capable of singing, of dancing, of working hard, and of having creative input. Some of the members write and produce music themselves, but these well-received songs are generally not promoted as Katseye singles, or they’re buried in their discography.
It also doesn’t help matters that Katseye’s main choreographer, Grant Gilmore, periodically blows up on X for his extremely over-the-top performances of his own choreography, which adds to a general sense of grotesquerie when it comes to the group’s moves, though general consensus remains that the choreo isn’t as cringe when the girls do it. Still, maybe this is why a particular part of Katseye’s live performance of “Hootie Frutti” has made waves for being out of sync and generally bad.
I’ve seen a lot of jokes about only the skibidi-toilet generation listening to Katseye. Is that accurate? Who even is their main fanbase now?
The question of Katseye’s audience is a really good one. When Katseye first debuted, they were beloved by young kids, Gen Z, and even younger millennials. This is perhaps best evidenced by the smashing success of their famed Gap ad and the love for their earlier singles like “Touch,” which remains one of their most-streamed songs to date. Now, it seems—if personal and online testimonies are any evidence—that their audience is mainly comprised of preteens and younger kids. Still, that age group doesn’t necessarily match Katseye’s edgier aesthetic and provocative stage outfits, even if it does match one’s idea of who would most likely listen to “Labubu” music.
Is all this drama translating to an actual threat to Katseye’s livelihood?
Not so far, from what I can tell. As trendy as it’s become to make fun of Katseye, their music videos still rack up tens of millions of views, while WILD is projected to debut at the top spot on the Billboard 200 chart, which would make it the group’s first No. 1 album and the biggest first-week debut by a girl group in almost two decades. Is that a sign of Katseye’s current success? Probably! At the very least, I imagine that the young Eyekons will love the release, and the former fans might at least be curious enough to stream WILD when it’s out. However, this is no guarantee of lasting success. (It’s probably not great that the group has felt on the verge of implosion multiple times in the two years since its debut.) All there’s left to do is watch the charts and see what happens.
Facts Only
* Manon Bannerman is on a temporary hiatus and has not participated in official Katseye activities, including recording or releasing new EPs.
* Katseye’s management companies, Hybe and Geffen Records, are mentioned as entities involved.
* The group released their third EP, WILD, earlier in the month.
* On August 7, Katseye’s management announced Sophia Laforteza would be temporarily unable to participate in promotional activities due to prioritizing her mental health and wellness, with a potential reassessment in September.
* On August 20, Megan Skiendiel announced she was taking time to care for herself and would return to promotional activities three days later.
* Social media jokes emerged regarding the temporary leaves of absence of multiple members.
* Musical output includes singles such as “Pinky Up,” “Animal,” and “Hootie Frutti.”
* The group’s main choreographer, Grant Gilmore, has generated online commentary regarding his choreography.
* Music videos for Katseye have garnered tens of millions of views.
* WILD is projected to debut at the top spot on the Billboard 200 chart.
Executive Summary
The situation surrounding the global pop group Katseye has been characterized by significant public scrutiny following announcements regarding member absences and recent musical output. The central uncertainty stems from Manon Bannerman’s stated "temporary hiatus," which was not accompanied by specific details or timelines, leading to widespread skepticism regarding the group and its management entities. While Bannerman remains on hiatus, she has not participated in official recording or release activities for Katseye, though public appearances confirm her presence at events. Other members have taken leaves of absence; Sophia Laforteza announced a temporary break citing mental health needs, supported by medical consultations, with a reassessment date set for September. Megan Skiendiel also took time off and subsequently returned to promotional activities. These absences have fueled social media commentary, resulting in jokes about the members taking breaks, especially when contrasted with the lack of concrete information provided regarding Bannerman's situation.
The broader context involves criticism directed at the group’s recent music, specifically singles like “Pinky Up,” “Animal,” and “Hootie Frutti,” and mockery directed at their choreographer. There is a noted disparity in how absences were communicated: Bannerman’s status was framed as a general hiatus, while Laforteza’s absence involved a more detailed personal statement regarding wellness support. Despite this internal dynamic, the financial viability of the group appears to be sustained by continued commercial success, evidenced by high music video views and projections for their upcoming album release. The narrative is split between public criticism and demonstrable commercial performance.
Full Take
The narrative demonstrates a significant tension between public perception, internal management opacity, and the demands of the idol industry structure. The core dynamic involves external observers projecting deep meaning onto unexplained member absences—particularly Bannerman’s lack of clear information—which generates intense speculation that can shift focus away from the group's creative output. This pattern reveals an imbalance where institutional silence regarding a key figure (Bannerman) creates a vacuum filled by fan-generated narratives, which then become focal points for further criticism directed at the remaining members and management. The contrast between the vague framing of Bannerman’s hiatus and the more specific documentation surrounding other members suggests a differential treatment in public communication, reinforcing a pattern where transparency is selectively applied.
Furthermore, the critique of the musical output and creative direction juxtaposed with the visible demands of the K-pop machine highlights a structural conflict: idols are expected to sustain relentless productivity while managing personal well-being. The emergence of mockery against the group's aesthetic and music styles suggests that the cultural consumption of these acts is heavily influenced by external critical frameworks, often prioritizing irony or trend saturation over substantive artistic assessment. The failure of management to provide consistent, context-aware communication regarding personal health issues creates a vulnerability exploited by the audience. The implication is that the mechanisms of celebrity promotion currently prioritize the maintenance of an idealized image and commercial output over genuine member support, leading to potential systemic failures in how agency and dignity are managed within high-pressure creative environments.
What are the unspoken assumptions underlying the scrutiny? Is it assumed that the public deserves complete transparency from idols regarding personal health, or is there an established allowance for privacy amidst intense public focus? If management prioritizes protecting group stability over individual transparency, what long-term consequences does this have on member autonomy and fan trust? How does the cycle of performance-based expectations reinforce the need for external validation through constant drama rather than stable internal structures?
