Skip to content
Chimera readability score 0.5929 out of 100, reading level.

Almost 01 January I have started a new bible in a year reading plan. And by almost every 30th of January I have stopped or fallen behind. I’m not alone. About 64% of New Year resolutions are abandoned within the first month and only 9% manage to last the whole year [International Journal of Environmental and Public Health]. So, this year I thought I’d try something different. Instead of reading the Bible in a year, I’m doing several 30 day bible reading challenges.
Why do a 30 day bible reading challenge
My reasons start with the issues of year long challenges.
A year challenge is very tough to stick too. If you miss one day, you fail and can feel like giving up. And even if you have a mindset that can get past missing one, you can quickly fall behind, which ends in demotivation too.
By contrast, a 30 day challenge is more of a sprint. It allows you to make short term dramatic changes and you can adjust your challenges as life changes:
- if one month is more tough, you can choose an easier challenge;
- if you have more time, try something more demanding.
- one month you can be more cerebral, another more artistic.
And if you do “fail”, you can always start again next month with a new challenge.
Plus, it’s a great way to do a few experiments and tests rather than commit to a long term change.
A quick example of the problems of a year goal
One year I wanted to make a sketchnote of a chapter of the Bible every day for a year.
I started well and really enjoyed the experience, but at the end of the second week I forgot my iPad on a trip and had no pens. So I missed a day.
I still continued but that same week I missed another day. A couple of weeks later and I had missed several more days as I lacked the motivation to put in the time some days. This was just after a month and the idea of continuing for the whole year suddenly felt daunting. So I stopped completely and went back to a more modest reading plan.
If this had been a 30 day challenge, maybe I would have completed more as it wouldn’t have felt such a long term commitment. And even if I hadn’t, I would have felt better about how much I did, rather than like I had abandoned after only a month and a half.
That’s why 30 day challenges are so powerful. They help us focus on our success, not our failures.
What challenges are you doing
I haven’t fully decided on my exact list of challenges for each month. In fact, I want to see what each month looks like before I commit to the next challenge. But there are some challenge I know I want to do at some point. Here’s my big list of ideas.
- read one book over and over again for a whole month
- read without a plan at all and decide on the day
- read the Bible in Greek
- listen while reading
- read with a study Bible
- read following a devotional
- read chronologically
- read the Bible in 30 days
- reading to a timer
- reading passages from both testaments in the same day
- reading every passage on a certain theme in a month
- Read about one person for a month
But the first challenge I want to do is the hardest.
I want to read the whole Bible in 7 days.
More on that soon.
Want to join in with the Bible reading challenges?
If you’re interested, you can join me with any of the challenges (including the first challenge.)
Plus I’d love to know any bible reading challenge ideas you have. Who knows, maybe I’ll adopt it!
Blessing Mpofu says
I like the idea of focusing on different types of challenges, each with its own purpose. Can’t wait to see how it goes. Looking forward to the updates Chris.
Ron Star says
Chris, you solved my problem, I have been wondering what can I do to memorize more than three or four chapters after I read the entire book. And the answer is to read one book over and over again for a whole month. Thanks

Facts Only

A person has repeatedly attempted and abandoned annual Bible reading plans by the end of January.
Approximately 64% of New Year’s resolutions are abandoned within the first month.
Only 9% of resolutions last the entire year, according to the International Journal of Environmental and Public Health.
The individual is switching to 30-day Bible reading challenges instead of a year-long plan.
A previous year-long challenge involved creating a sketchnote of a Bible chapter daily but was abandoned after a month and a half.
The new approach allows for flexibility, such as adjusting challenge difficulty based on time availability.
Proposed challenges include reading one book repeatedly, reading without a plan, or focusing on themes or individuals.
The first challenge is to read the entire Bible in seven days.
Others have expressed interest in joining or suggesting additional challenges.
Feedback includes positive responses, such as using repeated reading for memorization.
The author plans to decide on each month’s challenge based on circumstances.

Executive Summary

A person has struggled with completing annual Bible reading plans, often abandoning them within the first month. Research indicates that 64% of New Year’s resolutions are abandoned within the first month, with only 9% lasting the entire year. To address this, they are shifting to 30-day Bible reading challenges, which offer flexibility and shorter-term commitments. These challenges allow for adjustments based on life circumstances and reduce the pressure of long-term failure. The author plans to experiment with various reading methods, such as reading one book repeatedly, reading without a plan, or focusing on themes or individuals. Their first challenge is to read the entire Bible in seven days. The approach aims to foster consistency and adaptability, with the potential for others to join or suggest additional challenges.
The author’s previous attempt at a year-long sketchnote project failed due to missed days and lost motivation, highlighting the difficulties of long-term commitments. The 30-day format mitigates this by providing a reset opportunity each month. The proposed challenges include diverse methods like reading in Greek, using study Bibles, or following devotionals. Feedback from others suggests enthusiasm for the approach, particularly the idea of repeated reading for memorization. The strategy emphasizes progress over perfection, with the flexibility to adjust goals as needed.

Full Take

The narrative presents a thoughtful critique of long-term commitments, particularly in spiritual or self-improvement contexts, by highlighting the psychological and practical barriers to sustained effort. The strongest version of this argument is its emphasis on adaptability and short-term focus as a way to build resilience and avoid the demotivation that comes with perceived failure. By reframing success as a series of manageable sprints rather than a marathon, the approach acknowledges human limitations while still encouraging growth. This is a constructive response to the common pitfall of all-or-nothing thinking, which often leads to abandonment of goals.
Patterns detected: none
The root cause here is the tension between aspiration and execution—a familiar paradox in habit formation. The unstated assumption is that consistency is more valuable than intensity, and that flexibility can prevent burnout. Historically, this echoes broader cultural shifts toward micro-goals and iterative progress, seen in trends like "atomic habits" or agile methodologies. The implications for human agency are significant: by lowering the stakes of failure, individuals may feel more empowered to engage with challenging material. However, the cost could be a lack of depth if the short-term focus prevents sustained engagement with complex ideas.
Bridge questions: How might this approach apply to other long-term goals beyond spiritual reading? What evidence exists that short-term challenges lead to lasting habits, and under what conditions? Could the flexibility of this method also enable avoidance of difficult material, and how might that be mitigated?
Counterstrike scan: If this were part of a coordinated influence campaign, the playbook might involve promoting short-termism to undermine deeper engagement with religious or philosophical texts, framing adaptability as a virtue while subtly discouraging sustained effort. However, the content does not align with this pattern. Instead, it offers a pragmatic solution to a common struggle, with no signs of manipulation or bad faith. The focus on personal agency and experimentation is healthy and aligns with principles of cognitive sovereignty.

Sentinel — Human

Confidence

The text reads as a reflective, personal essay grounded in specific experiences, utilizing a conversational yet structured approach to propose a psychological strategy.

Signals Detected
low severity: Erratic sentence length and conversational tone mixed with formal citation.
low severity: Strong, emotionally resonant narrative arc based on personal failure and solution, establishing a clear human voice.
low severity: Specific, idiosyncratic examples (losing the iPad, missing days) that anchor the general advice, suggesting genuine experience rather than template matching.
low severity: The use of specific, slightly awkward anecdotal details (e.g., the iPad/pen story) suggests genuine memory or creative embellishment, not pure LLM confabulation.
Human Indicators
Presence of specific, personal anecdotes that ground the abstract advice in concrete, emotionally charged failure and recovery.
The voice exhibits genuine vulnerability and a focus on the psychological mechanics of failure, which is characteristic of reflective human writing.
Introducing the Year of 30 Day Bible Reading Challenges — Arc Codex