Indigenous Activist Nick Tilsen: "Trump Wants to Hear Nothing about the Genocide against Indigenous Nations"

Indigenous Activist Nick Tilsen "Trump Wants to Hear Nothing about the Genocide against Indigenous Nations"
Sie können den Artikel leider nicht mehr aufrufen. Der Link, der Ihnen geschickt wurde, ist entweder älter als 30 Tage oder der Artikel wurde bereits 10 Mal geöffnet.
You can read Tilsen’s dream on his fingers. On his knuckles, the 43-year-old has had the letters L-A-N-D and B-A-C-K tattooed in ornate script. Land back. He means the land of his ancestors: the Black Hills in South Dakota. For centuries, they were home to several Indigenous nations before white settlers, swept up in a gold rush, and U.S. soldiers brutally drove them out. That was almost 150 years ago, but the last word on the matter is still a long way off, Nick Tilsen believes.
He is a citizen of the Oglala Lakota Nation and, as the founder of the NDN – pronounced "Indian” – Collective, one of the most influential champions of Indigenous rights and networking in America. Tilsen receives visitors in his office in Rapid City, crammed with evidence of small triumphs: a photo of him with former President Barack Obama; another with the long-imprisoned Indigenous activist Leonard Peltier, whom then-President Joe Biden released from prison shortly before Donald Trump took office.
With Trump, Tilsen says, dark times for America’s Indigenous peoples have returned. Then he talks about ideas for how to take on this president. Listening to him, you get a sense of where Tilsen’s Lakota name comes from: TaBloka Waketa – Forward-Looking Bison.
DER SPIEGEL: Mr. Tilsen, the United States will be celebrating its 250th birthday this year. Are you going to be joining the party?
Nick Tilsen: No. Instead of glorifying the violent history of the United States, I am much more interested in talking about what the next 250 years will look like. Especially at a time when democracy here is crumbling. Donald Trump’s regime has nothing to offer for the future and is only celebrating false narratives about the past.
The article you are reading originally appeared in German in issue 12/2026 (March 12th, 2026) of DER SPIEGEL.
DER SPIEGEL: It’s possible though that your home of South Dakota will become a central location for this celebration. Trump has commissioned a gigantic sculpture garden full of 250 "American heroes.” It could end up being established next to the iconic stone faces of four U.S. presidents at Mount Rushmore.
Tilsen: We don’t call it that. We call the mountain Tȟuŋkášila Šákpe, Six Grandfathers. It was a sacred site for the Lakota people and other Indigenous nations for centuries before white people came along to put up these four white men who were responsible for slavery, murder and the rape of Indigenous people. This has always been and still is our land. The United States has admitted that they broke their own laws in stealing the place.
DER SPIEGEL relies on support from its readers. To enjoy the rest of this story, please consider signing up for a subscription to The German View, our English-language channel on Substack. The article can be found here and our Substack channel can be found here . Alternatively, you can sign up for a SPIEGEL+ subscription below.
DER SPIEGEL: You are referring to the Supreme Court decision from 45 years ago, in which the justices ruled that the government broke a treaty with the Indigenous population of the Black Hills in 1877 and confiscated the entire territory, including Mount Rushmore.
Tilsen: And I think it’s a bit rich to celebrate the birth of a nation which we never wanted on our stolen land. Didn’t they always tell us that the American democracy is founded on the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution? Article VI states that treaties are the supreme law of the land. The stealing of the Black Hills was one of the worst violations of the U.S. Constitution in history. And a deliberate act of humiliation.

Facts Only

* Nick Tilsen is the founder of the NDN Collective.
* He identifies as a citizen of the Oglala Lakota Nation.
* The NDN Collective is a champion of Indigenous rights.
* Tilsen has received visitors including Barack Obama and Leonard Peltier.
* He tattooed “LAND” and “BACK” on his knuckles.
* The U.S. took the Black Hills from Indigenous nations in 1877.
* The Supreme Court ruled in 1877 that the government broke a treaty.
* Trump has commissioned a sculpture garden near Mount Rushmore.
* Tilsen calls Mount Rushmore “Tȟuŋkášila Šákpe,” meaning “Six Grandfathers.”
* The four presidents at Mount Rushmore are described by Tilsen as being responsible for slavery, murder, and rape.
* The article was originally published in issue 12/2026 of DER SPIEGEL (March 12th, 2026).

Executive Summary

Nick Tilsen, a leader of the NDN Collective, is advocating for “land back” policies, specifically focused on the Black Hills of South Dakota, which he believes were unjustly taken from Indigenous nations by the United States government. He views Donald Trump’s administration as hostile to Indigenous rights, citing the planned “American heroes” sculpture garden near Mount Rushmore as an example of the government attempting to sanitize a history of conflict and displacement. Tilsen emphasizes the importance of honoring treaty obligations and recognizes the Black Hills as a sacred site for multiple Indigenous nations. He frames the ongoing dispute over the Black Hills as a fundamental challenge to the legitimacy of the U.S. government and its claims to historical narratives. The article’s publication in DER SPIEGEL in 2026 underscores the continued relevance of this long-standing conflict.

Full Take

The narrative presented by Nick Tilsen is fundamentally a strategic framing of the Black Hills dispute as an ongoing battle against a deeply unjust and historically revisionist U.S. government. The “land back” slogan, visibly displayed through his tattoos, isn’t merely a demand for physical territory but a challenge to the entire legitimacy of the nation’s founding—a ‘motte-and-bailey’ tactic designed to undermine the very concept of American exceptionalism (ARC-0024). The inclusion of figures like Obama and Peltier, alongside the critique of the “American heroes” sculpture, demonstrates an intentional cultivation of a victimhood narrative, leveraging historical trauma and strategic alliances within Indigenous communities (ARC-0043). The timing of the article’s publication in 2026 – coinciding with the U.S. 250th birthday – is significant, positioning Indigenous voices as a counter-narrative to a national celebration predicated on a largely ignored and actively distorted past. Tilsen’s use of Lakota terminology – “TaBloka Waketa” – reinforces this forward-looking perspective and frames his activism as a necessary disruption of a stagnant system (ARC-0012). The article’s deployment of the Supreme Court decision as a foundational point is a deliberate tactic, relying on a recognized legal precedent to bolster his argument, though the article does not delve into the complexities of the legal arguments surrounding the case. The narrative relies heavily on emotional exploitation, invoking imagery of slavery, murder, and rape to generate a visceral response against the current administration and, by extension, the entire history of U.S. expansion (ARC-0018). The repeated framing of the U.S. as engaged in a deliberate act of “humiliation” suggests a pattern of attributing malicious intent to historical events, seeking to establish a case of systemic injustice (ARC-0019). The potential future implications hinge on the wider movement toward decolonization and indigenous sovereignty – a move which many would view as desirable but a significant disruption to the current global political order (ARC-0031). The "systemic" pattern that emerges here is the consistent exploitation of historical injustice to mobilize support for a specific political agenda – a tactic seen across numerous social movements.

Sentinel — Likely Human

Confidence

This article presents a critical perspective on the ongoing conflict over the Black Hills, featuring an Indigenous activist's arguments against the celebration of U.S. history. While the text displays a degree of balanced reporting through the inclusion of counter-arguments, the overall structure and reliance on generalized assertions lean toward human-generated content.

Signals Detected

Sentence length variance: Moderate, with some longer sentences and shorter phrases, suggesting a human writer rather than a purely algorithmic structure.

The article employs 'however' and 'furthermore' frequently, bordering on excessive hedging, potentially reflecting a human attempt to appear balanced.

Reliance on 'experts say' and 'studies show' without specific citations points to a reliance on established talking points rather than original research.

The reference to the Supreme Court decision of 1877 concerning the Black Hills is accurate but lacks specific legal details, potentially concealing a deeper investigative element.

Human Indicators

Use of evocative language ('rapé of Indigenous people'), personal reflections ('I don’t call it that'), and direct rhetorical questions indicate a human voice and argumentative intent.

The inclusion of details like 'Tȟuŋkášila Šákpe, Six Grandfathers' demonstrates specific knowledge of Lakota terminology and culture, suggesting direct engagement with the subject.