Skip to content
Chimera readability score 71 out of 100, Expert reading level.

By — Matthew Daly, Associated Press Matthew Daly, Associated Press By — Ali Swenson, Associated Press Ali Swenson, Associated Press Leave your feedback Share Copy URL https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/the-epa-promised-a-maha-agenda-it-has-yet-to-materialize-frustrating-activists Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Tumblr Share on Facebook Share on Twitter The EPA promised a MAHA agenda. It has yet to materialize, frustrating activists Politics Jul 10, 2026 7:39 PM EDT WASHINGTON (AP) — Last December, after Make America Healthy Again activists drew up a petition to get him fired, Environmental Protection Agency administrator Lee Zeldin pledged to release a formal agenda of MAHA priorities that his agency would pursue, including protections against harmful chemicals and other health concerns. But eight months after its first mention and after repeated promises it was being drafted, the so-called MAHA agenda is nowhere to be found. When asked for a status update this week, an EPA spokesperson said MAHA is an ongoing effort, not a single report. WATCH: Trump administration moves to roll back limits on forever chemicals in drinking water The apparent reversal on the release of a formal environmental health agenda is the latest in a cascade of disappointments for Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s MAHA movement, who say they've lost faith that the Trump administration will take any significant action on pesticides, chemicals or other issues they view as key to address America's chronic disease epidemic. It also reflects the EPA's relentless rollback of environmental regulations even in the face of pressure from an important voting bloc that has supported President Donald Trump. Educate your inbox Subscribe to Here’s the Deal, our politics newsletter for analysis you won’t find anywhere else. Enter your email address Subscribe Form error message goes here. Thank you. Please check your inbox to confirm. "I had really hoped that there would be specific steps that were taken through a MAHA agenda," said activist Kelly Ryerson, whose social media account "Glyphosate Girl" focuses on nontoxic food systems. "We haven't had any of the wins that we were requesting." Many in the diverse coalition of MAHA activists that Trump credits for helping him win back the White House say they plan to vote on issues over party in November's congressional elections, raising the political stakes of their increasingly public tensions with the Republican administration. "People are done with the profits of corporations being prioritized over public health," said Alexandra Muñoz, a molecular toxicologist who collaborates with activists on certain issues. "And I think that will have an important role in the midterms." MAHA is frustrated with EPA's actions "Trump's EPA," as Zeldin frequently calls the agency, has vigorously pursued a deregulatory agenda. Earlier this year, Zeldin proposed overturning the landmark finding that climate change is a threat to human health. He moved to roll back dozens of environmental regulations in what he called "the greatest day of deregulation our nation has seen," froze billions of dollars for clean energy and upended agency research. WATCH: Trump rolls back landmark policy regulating greenhouse emissions At the same time, Zeldin has touted multiple "MAHA wins," some of which activists say are anything but. For example, he said the agency intends to regulate some chemicals called phthalates for environmental and workplace risks, but didn't address the thousands of consumer products that contain the ingredients. This week, the EPA diverted from past assurances that the MAHA report was in its "final stages," telling The Associated Press in an email that the EPA's actions should speak for themselves. "The notion that MAHA is a single document waiting to be unveiled fundamentally misrepresents how we operate," an agency spokesperson said, adding that work on MAHA priorities is "active and expanding every day." Ryerson and other MAHA activists said they've engaged with agency officials about changes they'd like to see, and occasionally succeeded. Her network of farmers worked with the administration on a recent executive order to advance regenerative agriculture. But she said EPA then used the order to justify new proposed uses for various herbicides, a move she called a "slap in the face." The same week, the Supreme Court dealt another blow to the MAHA cause in siding with pesticide maker Bayer in a ruling related to its legal liability for alleged harm caused by its Roundup weedkiller. The Trump administration had backed the company in the case. Environmental activists say the rise of Kennedy and his MAHA mission has rippled across the administration, raising the public's awareness of pesticides — and expectations that Trump's administration would act. "If RFK and the MAHA movement hadn't put that issue in the center of the public spotlight, no one would be scrutinizing this nearly as closely," said Sarah Starman, a senior food and agriculture campaigner at the nonprofit Friends of the Earth. EPA says getting microplastics out of drinking water is complicated In a well-publicized gesture aimed in part at the MAHA movement, Zeldin in April included microplastics and pharmaceuticals on a list of contaminants that could be regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act. Activists had pressured Zeldin for months to crack down on microplastics and other environmental contaminants. But in a reversal in late June, the EPA did not include microplastics or pharmaceuticals on a list of chemicals it plans to test for under a mandatory program used to collect information about concerning chemicals in drinking water that could be harming human health. The move rendered the EPA's earlier public health promises "functionally toothless,'' said Betsy Southerland, a former senior official in EPA's water office. Zeldin said on social media that "the technology to test and treat for microplastics in drinking water is still in development." The EPA said in a Federal Register notice that it was "not feasible to develop a drinking water analytical method within the statutory timeframe." After making "a big splash in the press" on microplastics, "EPA has quietly stalled that momentum," said Southerland. A White House Make America Healthy Again Report, released a few months into Trump's second term, identified long-term exposure to environmental chemicals — including those widely found in plastics — as a leading cause of chronic disease in children. Former industry lobbyists now have leading roles at EPA Jeremy Symons, a senior adviser at the Environmental Protection Network, a group of former EPA employees and political appointees who are critical of the Trump administration, said Zeldin "pays lip service to MAHA, but sadly he is actually making Americans less safe from toxic chemicals.'' Alongside MAHA's influence on the Trump administration, industry lobbyists have made inroads at the EPA. Kyle Kunkler, a former lobbyist for the soybean industry, leads pesticide policy at the EPA. The agency recently allowed continued use of dicamba, a weedkiller that has been linked to increased risk for some cancers. Zen Honeycutt, a MAHA activist and founding executive director of Moms Across America, said the move is "what happens when the EPA allows itself to be pressured by corporations and by business." EPA also employs other former industry insiders. Nancy Beck, a former executive at the chemical lobbying group the American Chemistry Council, is a top official in EPA's Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. Lynn Dekleva, another former chemistry council executive, serves as a Beck deputy. The EPA said Kunkler and other political appointees have consulted with agency ethics officials to resolve any potential conflicts of interest. The MAHA movement has "driven this agency's work since President Trump's first day in office," a spokesperson said in an email, citing various initiatives including $945 million in grants to help states and communities cut "forever chemicals" known as PFAS in drinking water and identifying 30 drinking water contaminants proposed for nationwide monitoring. On Thursday, the agency announced it was teaming up with Health and Human Services and the U.S. Department of Agriculture to protect consumers from heavy metals and other contaminants in food. But for Ryerson and others, the lack of a promised MAHA agenda reads as a tactic to escape accountability. "It absolves them of any failures, especially when it comes to midterms," Ryerson said. "They won't have to point to some list that they haven't been able to achieve really anything on." A free press is a cornerstone of a healthy democracy. Support trusted journalism and civil dialogue. Donate now By — Matthew Daly, Associated Press Matthew Daly, Associated Press By — Ali Swenson, Associated Press Ali Swenson, Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) — Last December, after Make America Healthy Again activists drew up a petition to get him fired, Environmental Protection Agency administrator Lee Zeldin pledged to release a formal agenda of MAHA priorities that his agency would pursue, including protections against harmful chemicals and other health concerns. But eight months after its first mention and after repeated promises it was being drafted, the so-called MAHA agenda is nowhere to be found. When asked for a status update this week, an EPA spokesperson said MAHA is an ongoing effort, not a single report. WATCH: Trump administration moves to roll back limits on forever chemicals in drinking water The apparent reversal on the release of a formal environmental health agenda is the latest in a cascade of disappointments for Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s MAHA movement, who say they've lost faith that the Trump administration will take any significant action on pesticides, chemicals or other issues they view as key to address America's chronic disease epidemic. It also reflects the EPA's relentless rollback of environmental regulations even in the face of pressure from an important voting bloc that has supported President Donald Trump. Educate your inbox Subscribe to Here’s the Deal, our politics newsletter for analysis you won’t find anywhere else. Enter your email address Subscribe Form error message goes here. Thank you. Please check your inbox to confirm. "I had really hoped that there would be specific steps that were taken through a MAHA agenda," said activist Kelly Ryerson, whose social media account "Glyphosate Girl" focuses on nontoxic food systems. "We haven't had any of the wins that we were requesting." Many in the diverse coalition of MAHA activists that Trump credits for helping him win back the White House say they plan to vote on issues over party in November's congressional elections, raising the political stakes of their increasingly public tensions with the Republican administration. "People are done with the profits of corporations being prioritized over public health," said Alexandra Muñoz, a molecular toxicologist who collaborates with activists on certain issues. "And I think that will have an important role in the midterms." MAHA is frustrated with EPA's actions "Trump's EPA," as Zeldin frequently calls the agency, has vigorously pursued a deregulatory agenda. Earlier this year, Zeldin proposed overturning the landmark finding that climate change is a threat to human health. He moved to roll back dozens of environmental regulations in what he called "the greatest day of deregulation our nation has seen," froze billions of dollars for clean energy and upended agency research. WATCH: Trump rolls back landmark policy regulating greenhouse emissions At the same time, Zeldin has touted multiple "MAHA wins," some of which activists say are anything but. For example, he said the agency intends to regulate some chemicals called phthalates for environmental and workplace risks, but didn't address the thousands of consumer products that contain the ingredients. This week, the EPA diverted from past assurances that the MAHA report was in its "final stages," telling The Associated Press in an email that the EPA's actions should speak for themselves. "The notion that MAHA is a single document waiting to be unveiled fundamentally misrepresents how we operate," an agency spokesperson said, adding that work on MAHA priorities is "active and expanding every day." Ryerson and other MAHA activists said they've engaged with agency officials about changes they'd like to see, and occasionally succeeded. Her network of farmers worked with the administration on a recent executive order to advance regenerative agriculture. But she said EPA then used the order to justify new proposed uses for various herbicides, a move she called a "slap in the face." The same week, the Supreme Court dealt another blow to the MAHA cause in siding with pesticide maker Bayer in a ruling related to its legal liability for alleged harm caused by its Roundup weedkiller. The Trump administration had backed the company in the case. Environmental activists say the rise of Kennedy and his MAHA mission has rippled across the administration, raising the public's awareness of pesticides — and expectations that Trump's administration would act. "If RFK and the MAHA movement hadn't put that issue in the center of the public spotlight, no one would be scrutinizing this nearly as closely," said Sarah Starman, a senior food and agriculture campaigner at the nonprofit Friends of the Earth. EPA says getting microplastics out of drinking water is complicated In a well-publicized gesture aimed in part at the MAHA movement, Zeldin in April included microplastics and pharmaceuticals on a list of contaminants that could be regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act. Activists had pressured Zeldin for months to crack down on microplastics and other environmental contaminants. But in a reversal in late June, the EPA did not include microplastics or pharmaceuticals on a list of chemicals it plans to test for under a mandatory program used to collect information about concerning chemicals in drinking water that could be harming human health. The move rendered the EPA's earlier public health promises "functionally toothless,'' said Betsy Southerland, a former senior official in EPA's water office. Zeldin said on social media that "the technology to test and treat for microplastics in drinking water is still in development." The EPA said in a Federal Register notice that it was "not feasible to develop a drinking water analytical method within the statutory timeframe." After making "a big splash in the press" on microplastics, "EPA has quietly stalled that momentum," said Southerland. A White House Make America Healthy Again Report, released a few months into Trump's second term, identified long-term exposure to environmental chemicals — including those widely found in plastics — as a leading cause of chronic disease in children. Former industry lobbyists now have leading roles at EPA Jeremy Symons, a senior adviser at the Environmental Protection Network, a group of former EPA employees and political appointees who are critical of the Trump administration, said Zeldin "pays lip service to MAHA, but sadly he is actually making Americans less safe from toxic chemicals.'' Alongside MAHA's influence on the Trump administration, industry lobbyists have made inroads at the EPA. Kyle Kunkler, a former lobbyist for the soybean industry, leads pesticide policy at the EPA. The agency recently allowed continued use of dicamba, a weedkiller that has been linked to increased risk for some cancers. Zen Honeycutt, a MAHA activist and founding executive director of Moms Across America, said the move is "what happens when the EPA allows itself to be pressured by corporations and by business." EPA also employs other former industry insiders. Nancy Beck, a former executive at the chemical lobbying group the American Chemistry Council, is a top official in EPA's Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. Lynn Dekleva, another former chemistry council executive, serves as a Beck deputy. The EPA said Kunkler and other political appointees have consulted with agency ethics officials to resolve any potential conflicts of interest. The MAHA movement has "driven this agency's work since President Trump's first day in office," a spokesperson said in an email, citing various initiatives including $945 million in grants to help states and communities cut "forever chemicals" known as PFAS in drinking water and identifying 30 drinking water contaminants proposed for nationwide monitoring. On Thursday, the agency announced it was teaming up with Health and Human Services and the U.S. Department of Agriculture to protect consumers from heavy metals and other contaminants in food. But for Ryerson and others, the lack of a promised MAHA agenda reads as a tactic to escape accountability. "It absolves them of any failures, especially when it comes to midterms," Ryerson said. "They won't have to point to some list that they haven't been able to achieve really anything on." A free press is a cornerstone of a healthy democracy. Support trusted journalism and civil dialogue. Donate now

Facts Only

* In December, after a petition by Make America Healthy Again activists, EPA administrator Lee Zeldin pledged to release a formal agenda of MAHA priorities.
* Eight months after the initial mention and repeated promises, the MAHA agenda has not been released; an EPA spokesperson stated it is an ongoing effort, not a single report.
* Activists expressed disappointment over the lack of specific steps taken through a MAHA agenda.
* Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s MAHA movement feels faith has been lost regarding action on pesticides and chemicals.
* The EPA pursued a deregulatory agenda under Zeldin, including proposing to overturn climate change findings and rolling back environmental regulations.
* Zeldin touted some "MAHA wins," such as the intention to regulate phthalates, but did not address thousands of consumer products containing these ingredients.
* The EPA diverged from assurances that the MAHA report was in its final stages.
* In April, Zeldin included microplastics and pharmaceuticals on a list for regulation under the Safe Drinking Water Act.
* In late June, the EPA did not include microplastics or pharmaceuticals on the testing list for drinking water contaminants.
* A White House Make America Healthy Again Report identified long-term exposure to environmental chemicals, including those in plastics, as a leading cause of chronic disease in children.
* Former industry lobbyists now hold roles at the EPA; named individuals include Jeremy Symons, Kyle Kunkler, Zen Honeycutt, Nancy Beck, and Lynn Dekleva.
* The EPA announced a team-up with HHS and USDA to protect consumers from heavy metals and other food contaminants.

Executive Summary

The Environmental Protection Agency administrator, Lee Zeldin, pledged to release a formal agenda of Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) priorities in December following a petition by MAHA activists. However, this agenda has not materialized eight months later; an EPA spokesperson stated that MAHA is an ongoing effort rather than a single report. This lack of a formal agenda has led to frustration among MAHA activists who feel faith has been lost regarding significant action on pesticides and chemicals. Activists suggest they plan to influence upcoming congressional elections, viewing the inaction as reflecting a broader deregulation agenda pursued by the Trump administration. Furthermore, efforts to address specific environmental concerns, such as microplastics in drinking water, have seen reversals; for example, the EPA did not include these contaminants in the testing list despite prior public assurances. Industry lobbyists and former officials within the EPA are cited as having influenced the agency's trajectory, with some arguing that the administration is prioritizing deregulation over public health protections.

Full Take

The narrative reveals a structural tension between public health advocacy and institutional action, framed by the pursuit of regulatory rollback. The primary pattern is the gap between high-level pledges (the MAHA agenda) and operational reality, suggesting that symbolic commitments are used to manage political pressure rather than enacting substantive policy change. This functions as a mechanism for deflection: when concrete wins are absent, the agency frames its inaction as ongoing work, thereby escaping accountability for failures. The move away from specific contaminant regulation, such as microplastics, demonstrates how administrative processes can be intentionally stalled or reversed despite public pressure. Furthermore, the explicit linkage between industry influence—through former lobbyists now serving in key EPA roles—and deregulation underscores a systemic alignment where regulatory bodies may serve corporate interests rather than broad public health mandates. The frustration articulated by activists suggests that the absence of a specific agenda is not merely an administrative delay but a deliberate tactic to postpone responsibility for chronic health outcomes, especially concerning elections and future policy settings. The implications point toward the fragility of accountability when powerful institutional and economic forces operate in concert against defined health goals.

Sentinel — Human

Confidence

The text appears to be human-authored investigative journalism synthesizing public statements and agency actions regarding environmental health initiatives, characterized by an emphasis on conflict and ongoing institutional frustration.

Signals Detected
low severity: Moderate sentence length variance; use of direct quotes and activist voices creates rhythmic shifts.
low severity: Strong thematic focus on the MAHA agenda, regulatory rollback, and activist frustration; narrative flow is driven by this tension.
low severity: Coordinated use of specific names, dates (or timeframes), and official actions suggests journalistic sourcing rather than pure LLM synthesis.
low severity: Claims are presented as a compilation of reported conflicts, official statements, and activist perspectives, typical of investigative reporting structure.
Human Indicators
The article seamlessly weaves multiple, seemingly disparate claims (pesticides, microplastics, PFAS, specific agency actions) connected by a persistent central conflict (MAHA vs. deregulation).
Use of embedded quotes from named activists (Ryerson, Muñoz, Starman) and former officials (Southerland) provides specific, non-generic emphasis.
The structure moves from a broad promise (MAHA agenda) to specific regulatory actions and then back to the resulting political fallout.
The EPA promised a MAHA agenda. It has yet to materialize, frustrating activists — Arc Codex