The two testbeds, known by their callsigns SCAN 06 and VOODOO 1, carried out concurrent operations in Eglin’s highly instrumented airspace.
For three consecutive days, on Mar. 24, 25 and 26, two testbed aircraft, the Northrop Grumman CRJ-700 carrying the U.S. registration code N806X and typically operating using the radio callsign “SCAN 06”, and the Raytheon’s Boeing 727, with registration N289MT and radio callsign “VOODOO 1,” carried out concurrent missions over the Gulf of Mexico (Gulf of America).
The two aircraft are extremely interesting. SCAN 06 is one of the three heavily modified CRJ700s owned by Northrop Grumman, the others being N804X and N805X, used to test sensors and communication systems before they are integrated into frontline combat aircraft. These jets can be reconfigured to support different developmental activities, including new radars, EW (Electronic Warfare) suites, targeting pods, missile seekers, and countermeasures. As we explained in detail here, N806X features a peculiar “pointy” nose bearing a striking resemblance to the AIM-260 Joint Advanced Tactical Missile (JATM) seen in renderings of the BVRAAM (Beyond Visual Range Air-to-Air Missile). For this reason, the aircraft is believed to be involved in the development of the AIM-260, a missile slated to replace the AIM-120 AMRAAM, which has been under development since 2017, with flight testing already underway for some time now.
Similarly, the famous Boeing 727 VOODOO 1, or RMT (Raytheon Multi-program Testbed) sports an F-15 nose radome and was used to test the AN/APG-82 Active Electronically Scanned Array – AESA recently. As TWZ reported when the aircraft took part in exercise Valiant Shield in June 2022: “Voodoo 1 is a key test asset for Raytheon. It has historically been mostly associated with the development of advanced radars, which it can carry on flight tests in its distinctly modified nose, which is basically that of an F-15 Eagle. This includes work on the AN/APG-63 series of Eagle radars, and more recently, the AN/APG-82 Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) type, versions of which are used on the Air Force’s new F-15EX Eagle II fighters and are being integrated onto existing F-15E Strike Eagle combat jets. Air Force B-52H bombers are also set to receive a variant of the AN/APG-82 as part of a radar upgrade program.”
Data collected by Flightradar24 provide an interesting “picture” of the activities carried out by the two aircraft last week.
VOODOO 1 carried out a mission from Eglin AFB, Florida, on Mar. 23, 2026. While flight-tracking websites do not show any other aircraft operating alongside the Raytheon testbed that day, it is worth remembering that not all aircraft, particularly military ones, are visible on these platforms. Therefore, N289MT may still have flown a test mission involving other airborne assets that were not trackable, or in coordination with ground stations or vessels.
The Raytheon radar testbed 727 N289MT, aka Voodoo-1, was active out over the gulf about an hour ago.
📷 credit Stephen Stein pic.twitter.com/zrQO4DmZ4A
— MeNMyRC (@MeNMyRC1) March 23, 2026
SCAN 06 flew from its base at Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport (BWI) in Maryland to Eglin AFB on Mar. 23, 2026. The first mission, on Mar. 24, saw the CRJ depart from Eglin at 12.35LT and land after 3 hours and 21 minutes. SCAN 06 operated at around 27,000 feet inside a restricted airspace (W-151) while VOODOO 1 remained slightly higher at roughly 27,850 feet, with the Northrop Grumman testbed flying what looked like a flower-shaped pattern reminiscent of certain calibration-style tracks. Noteworthy, the barometric altitude shown by Flightradar24 is essentially a pressure-derived value and may differ slightly from the aircraft’s actual assigned Flight Level when converted into feet. For example, a displayed altitude of 27,850 feet would very likely correspond in practice to FL280. The discrepancy was probably caused by the difference between standard pressure (1013.2 hPa/29.92 inHg) and the real atmospheric pressure in the area, as well as by the way barometric data are transmitted, rounded, and displayed by the tracking platform. Above the transition altitude, aircraft no longer use the local altimeter setting (QNH), but switch to the standard pressure setting and are then assigned flight levels rather than true altitudes above mean sea level.
On Mar. 25, the mission lasted 2 hours and 52 minutes with departure at 11.52LT. VOODOO 1 again stayed higher, at around 27,000 feet, while SCAN 06 flew lower and more variable profiles between roughly 25,000 and 15,000-16,000 feet, with the two aircraft appearing to follow parallel tracks.
On Mar. 26 (2h 54m with take off at 12.56LT), the geometry changed as shown in the image below, with SCAN 06 at about 15,825 feet and Voodoo 1 lower at roughly 12,575 feet.
Interestingly, as the screenshots show, during the testing campaign on Mar. 24, 25 and 26, SCAN 06 has always operated to the East of VOODOO 1.
Taken together, these mission profiles that can be observed with altitude relationships and flight patterns seem to point to a series of test setups involving different relative positions, geometries and sensor or data-collection conditions, although, of course, the available evidence does not allow the precise purpose of the sorties to be determined.
Nonetheless, the fact that the Northrop Grumman testbed was flying in company with Raytheon’s VOODOO 1 for three consecutive days at Eglin is particularly interesting, as it suggests the activity may have involved some degree of integration between the sensors carried by the two platforms. As explained, VOODOO 1 is Raytheon’s airborne radar and mission-systems testbed, a platform that has already been used both to evaluate advanced radar capabilities in flight and to support demonstrations or exercises involving the collection, fusion and dissemination of targeting data across a wider network. We can only speculate here, but we can outline a number of tests the two testbeds may have been involved in, including telemetry-rich sensor, radar, communications or data-link testing tied to a distributed kill chain, the generation and sharing of targeting-quality tracks, broader battle-network experimentation, or other forms of mid-course support relevant to a modern BVRAAM.
Eglin Test & Training Complex
The activity took place within W-151 airspace over one of the most important test environments in the United States. Indeed, the Eastern Gulf Test and Training Range, or Eglin Gulf Test and Training Range, is the largest military range in the continental U.S., offering the capacity, instrumentation and safety footprint required for both real-life and simulated warfighting scenarios. Stretching from Key West to Northwest Florida and covering some 180,000 square miles of DoW-controlled airspace, the range supports everything from missile and aircraft testing to high-altitude supersonic air combat training, air-to-air missile trials, drone testing and hypersonic weapons evaluations. It is therefore an ideal setting for the testing of next-generation air armaments in realistic combat-surrogate conditions.
Interestingly, Aaron Perlupo, who took the photos of the two testbeds you can find in this post, mentioned that another quite famous testbed, the secretive RAT (or RATT) 55, a highly modified B737 fitted with advanced radar technology, and thought to be used almost exclusively to evaluate the radar signatures of stealthy aircraft, was also deployed to Florida operating out of Macdill at least 4 days prior to VOODOO and SCAN operating out of Eglin.
“I was visiting the region with a friend, and I saw VOODOO1 on Flightradar24 land at Eglin AFB,” Aaron told us in an email. “I also heard a report that RATT55 was in Florida, so I convinced my friend to drive to Eglin to try and see them. While planning the drive to Eglin, I noticed SCAN06 arrive and start flying circles with VOODOO. We drove to a public area north of the airport in the mid afternoon, where I was able to spot SCAN with the missile attached to its nose. As soon as I saw the missile I knew something was up, but I had no idea what type of missile or mission it was until someone else pointed it out to me after the fact.”
AIM-260 JATM
Dealing with the missile, here’s what we wrote in a previous post about the AIM-260:
Intended to serve as the primary long-range air-to-air weapon of both the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy in the coming years, the AIM-260 is seen as America’s counter to increasingly advanced missile technologies under development by the People’s Republic of China. Compared to the AIM-120 AMRAAM it is intended to replace, the AIM-260 will feature a more capable rocket motor providing speeds up to Mach 5 and a range of over 200 kilometers.
The current AIM-120D-3 AMRAAM variant is said to offer around 160 kilometers of range. The AMRAAM will continue to be developed, with new variants intended to complement, rather than compete with, the JATM. Additionally, it’s likely many overseas customers would opt for newer models of the AMRAAM which would be more economical to purchase and familiar to operate.
Along with manned tactical fighter aircraft like the F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lightning II, the AIM-260 is expected to be integrated on the U.S. Air Force’s upcoming unmanned Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA). CCAs will operate in tandem with manned fighters, offering the capability to carry a greater payload into combat as well as providing a platform able to be sent into high threat environments without placing pilots at increased risk.
Previous statements have claimed AIM-260 production will overtake AIM-120 production by 2026. It is unknown whether this milestone is still on schedule, though it is likely that a significant number of AIM-260 units have been produced and will be fielded in the near future.
H/T to Aaron Perlupo for sending us the images of SCAN 06 and VOODOO 1. You can follow him on Instagram here.
Facts Only
Two testbed aircraft, SCAN 06 (Northrop Grumman CRJ-700, registration N806X) and VOODOO 1 (Raytheon Boeing 727, registration N289MT), conducted concurrent operations over the Gulf of Mexico on March 24, 25, and 26, 2026.
SCAN 06 is one of three modified CRJ-700s used for testing sensors and communication systems, featuring a nose resembling the AIM-260 Joint Advanced Tactical Missile (JATM).
VOODOO 1 is a Boeing 727 with an F-15 nose radome, used for testing advanced radar systems, including the AN/APG-82 AESA.
On March 24, SCAN 06 flew at approximately 27,000 feet, while VOODOO 1 operated at around 27,850 feet within restricted airspace W-151.
On March 25, SCAN 06 varied its altitude between 25,000 and 15,000 feet, with VOODOO 1 remaining near 27,000 feet.
On March 26, SCAN 06 flew at about 15,825 feet, with VOODOO 1 lower at roughly 12,575 feet.
The missions occurred within the Eglin Gulf Test and Training Range, the largest military range in the continental U.S.
Another testbed, RAT 55 (a modified Boeing 737), was reported in Florida around the same time but was not confirmed to be involved in these operations.
The AIM-260 JATM is intended to replace the AIM-120 AMRAAM, offering extended range and speed.
SCAN 06 was observed with a missile-like attachment on its nose, suggesting involvement in AIM-260 development.
Flight data indicates the aircraft operated in parallel tracks, with SCAN 06 consistently positioned east of VOODOO 1.
The operations suggest potential sensor integration or data-collection testing between the two platforms.
Executive Summary
Two specialized testbed aircraft, Northrop Grumman’s CRJ-700 (callsign SCAN 06) and Raytheon’s Boeing 727 (callsign VOODOO 1), conducted concurrent operations over the Gulf of Mexico from March 24 to 26, 2026. SCAN 06, a modified CRJ-700 with a distinctive "pointy" nose resembling the AIM-260 Joint Advanced Tactical Missile (JATM), is believed to be involved in the development of this next-generation air-to-air missile. VOODOO 1, a Boeing 727 equipped with an F-15 nose radome, serves as Raytheon’s airborne radar testbed, previously used for evaluating advanced radar systems like the AN/APG-82 AESA. Flight data shows the aircraft operating at varying altitudes and patterns, suggesting coordinated sensor or data-collection tests. The missions took place within the Eglin Gulf Test and Training Range, a key U.S. military testing environment. Additionally, another testbed, the secretive RAT 55 (a modified Boeing 737), was reported in Florida around the same time, though its involvement in these operations remains unclear. The AIM-260, intended to replace the AIM-120 AMRAAM, is expected to offer extended range and speed, enhancing U.S. air superiority capabilities.
The concurrent operations of these testbeds hint at potential integration between sensor systems, possibly related to distributed kill chain testing or mid-course support for advanced missiles. While the exact purpose of the missions is not confirmed, the involvement of both Northrop Grumman and Raytheon assets suggests collaboration in developing next-generation air combat technologies. The presence of these aircraft in a highly instrumented military range underscores the strategic importance of the Gulf of Mexico for testing advanced aerospace systems.
Full Take
The concurrent operations of SCAN 06 and VOODOO 1 over the Gulf of Mexico present a compelling case of advanced aerospace testing, likely tied to the development of next-generation air combat systems. The strongest version of this narrative is that these missions represent a coordinated effort to test sensor integration, data fusion, or mid-course support for the AIM-260 JATM, a critical component of U.S. air superiority strategy. The involvement of both Northrop Grumman and Raytheon assets, along with the presence of another high-profile testbed (RAT 55), underscores the strategic importance of these operations. The Eglin Gulf Test and Training Range provides an ideal environment for such testing, given its extensive instrumentation and controlled airspace.
However, the narrative also invites scrutiny of potential manipulation patterns. The article leans heavily on speculative language ("believed to be involved," "suggests," "may have been involved") without definitive evidence, which could be interpreted as a form of ambiguity (ARC-0024) to amplify the perceived significance of the operations. Additionally, the framing of the AIM-260 as a direct counter to Chinese missile advancements could be seen as a form of emotional exploitation (ARC-0043), leveraging geopolitical tensions to heighten the stakes of the testing. The lack of confirmed details about the involvement of RAT 55 further introduces uncertainty, potentially serving as a distraction or red herring.
The root cause of this narrative appears to be the broader paradigm of military technological competition, particularly between the U.S. and China. The unstated assumption is that the AIM-260 and associated sensor systems are critical to maintaining U.S. air dominance, a claim that, while plausible, lacks independent verification in this context. Historically, this echoes Cold War-era arms races, where technological advancements were framed as existential necessities.
The implications for human agency and dignity are complex. On one hand, advancements in missile technology could reduce pilot risk by extending engagement ranges. On the other, the escalation of arms races may exacerbate global tensions and divert resources from humanitarian needs. The second-order consequences include potential proliferation of these technologies to allied nations and the risk of miscalculation in high-stakes conflicts.
Bridge questions to consider: What independent verification exists for the claimed capabilities of the AIM-260? How might the integration of these systems affect the balance of power in contested regions like the South China Sea? What ethical frameworks should guide the development and deployment of such advanced weaponry?
Counterstrike scan: If this narrative were part of a coordinated influence campaign, the playbook would likely emphasize the urgency of technological superiority, frame the testing as a direct response to adversarial threats, and use ambiguous language to amplify perceived stakes. The actual content aligns with this pattern to some degree, particularly in its speculative framing and geopolitical context. However, the inclusion of verifiable flight data and technical details mitigates the risk of outright manipulation. The narrative remains within the bounds of reasonable reporting but warrants critical engagement.
