Skip to content
Chimera readability score 0.6268 out of 100, reading level.

New KFF Data Interactive Tracks Polling on Health Information and Trust
In the weeks after the Trump administration reduced the number of recommended childhood vaccines for routine use, the public’s trust in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) remains at its lowest point, a new KFF Poll on Health Information and Trust finds.
Fewer than half (47%) now say that they trust the agency at least “a fair amount” to provide reliable vaccine information, similar to the share who said the same in September, but down more than 10 percentage points since the beginning of the second Trump administration, and continuing a downward trend first measured during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The recent decline reflects falling confidence among Democrats. Slightly more than half (55%) of Democrats now say they trust the CDC on vaccines, down from 64% September. About 4 in 10 Republicans say they trust the CDC for vaccine information, similar to the share who said the same a few months ago and in 2023, but fewer than half as many as said they trusted the CDC on the coronavirus back in 2020.
“Six years ago, 85% of Americans, and 90% of Republicans, trusted the CDC. Now less than half trust the CDC on vaccines,” KFF President and CEO Drew Altman said. “The wars over COVID, science, and vaccines have left the country without a trusted national voice on vaccines, and that trust will take time to restore.”
Findings from the latest KFF Tracking Poll on Health Information and Trust, and more than a dozen previous polls, are now available on a new interactive dashboard tracking the public’s trusted sources for health information, attitudes toward vaccines, and use of news, social media, and AI for health-related information.
The dashboard provides visual representations of the key trends in the public’s trust in health information and tracks exposure to and belief in false and unproven health claims. The downloadable data and charts allow researchers, policymakers, journalists, and others to explore partisan and demographic differences on key health information issues. The dashboard will be updated regularly.
Awareness of and Views toward Changes in Recommended Childhood Vaccines
The latest poll finds that among those who have heard about the recent changes to the recommended childhood vaccine schedule, more say they expect the changes to have a negative impact than a positive one on children’s health.
About half of the public (51%), and a similar share of parents (52%), say they’ve heard at least some about the federal government’s recent changes to the recommended childhood vaccine schedule. This group, by a 2-1 margin, say the changes will have a negative impact on children’s health (54%) rather than a positive one (26%). The same is true among parents who heard about the changes, with a larger share saying the changes will negatively impact children’s health (47%) than have a positive impact (29%).
Democrats and independents largely expect the changes to hurt children’s health, while Republicans and supporters of the “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) movement largely expect it to improve children’s health.
Amid recent changes, confidence remains high across the public and parents in the safety of the MMR and polio vaccines, two longstanding childhood vaccines that continue to be recommended for routine use. This includes at least 3 in 4 Democrats, independents, Republicans, parents, and MAHA supporters.
But fewer are confident in the safety of the vaccines that are no longer universally recommended, and there are larger partisan differences.
- Majorities of the public are also confident in the safety of the hepatitis B (70%) and flu (65%) vaccines for children, and just under half (48%) are confident in the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine. The recent changes removed these three vaccines from the routine recommended childhood vaccine schedule.
- Partisans are divided on their views of the three vaccines removed from the federal recommended vaccine schedule, with Democrats being more likely than Republicans to express confidence in their safety. The partisan gap is widest for the COVID-19 vaccine, with about eight in ten Democrats confident in their safety, nearly three times the share of Republicans who say the same (79% vs. 28%). Democrats are also more likely than Republicans to be confident in the safety of flu (82% vs. 52%) and hepatitis B vaccines (85% vs. 61%).
Designed and analyzed by public opinion researchers at KFF, this survey was conducted January 13-20, 2026, online and by telephone among a nationally representative sample of 1,426 U.S. adults in English and in Spanish. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for the full sample. For results based on other subgroups, the margin of sampling error may be higher.

Facts Only

Actors: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Trump administration
Events: Changes to recommended childhood vaccines for routine use
Timeline: September 2023, January 2026
Locations: United States

Executive Summary

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) faces continued low trust levels in providing reliable vaccine information, following changes to the recommended childhood vaccines by the Trump administration. The recent decline in trust is primarily attributed to falling confidence among Democrats, while Republicans' trust in the CDC remains relatively unchanged. The public's awareness of and views towards the changes in recommended childhood vaccines are mixed, with more people expecting the changes to have a negative impact on children's health. Confidence in the safety of the newly removed vaccines is lower compared to longstanding childhood vaccines that continue to be recommended.

Full Take

Analyzing this article from a skeptical perspective, we can identify several patterns worth noting:
Emotional exploitation: The title of the article, "Poll: Trust and Confidence in the CDC Remain at Low Point," employs emotional manipulation by appealing to the public's concerns about the CDC's credibility.
Distortion: The article frames the changes to the recommended childhood vaccines as a reduction, which may mislead readers into believing that the number of vaccines has been reduced drastically, when in fact only three vaccines have been removed from the routine recommended childhood vaccine schedule.
False framing: The article presents a binary choice between the changes being harmful or helpful to children's health, without exploring the potential benefits and drawbacks of the changes in detail.
Examining the root cause of this narrative, it appears that the decline in trust in the CDC is driven by ongoing political polarization and the politicization of public health issues, particularly during the Trump administration. The implications of this decline in trust are significant, as it may hinder public support for vaccination efforts and complicate public health responses to future crises.
Bridge questions: What factors contributed to the decline in trust in the CDC among Democrats? How can the public and policymakers work to restore trust in public health institutions? What are the long-term effects of the politicization of public health issues on public health outcomes?
Assessing the article's structural alignment with a hypothetical coordinated influence campaign, there is no evidence to suggest that it is part of such a campaign. However, the emotional exploitation and false framing employed in the article may be used by bad actors to sow mistrust and undermine public support for vaccination efforts.

Sentinel — Human

Confidence

The analysis suggests that the text is likely human-written, with natural sentence length variance, a clear personal voice, and no coordination indicators of synthetic content.

Signals Detected
low severity: Sentence length variance and lexical diversity vs. sophistication mismatch indicate human writing.
low severity: Idiosyncratic emphasis, personal voice, and stylistic fingerprint present.
low severity: No talking points appearing nearly verbatim across sources or vague attribution found.
Human Indicators
The text shows a natural rhythm and variety in sentence length.
The text demonstrates a clear personal voice and stylistic fingerprint.
The article does not present statistics without methodology or source.