Skip to content
Chimera readability score 0.523 out of 100, reading level.

The air felt different at this year’s SXSW, the annual March festival where tech meets pop culture in Austin. I was reminded of the 2019 SXSW when people packed downtown, and snake lines formed out of local ventures.
Attendees said it was like that again this year, though my friend, who lives in the area and has attended many times, admitted that some stuff has changed. For instance the festival is now two days shorter than it used to be. It was also “decentralized,” mainly due to the demolition of the Austin Convention Center, which scattered events and panels throughout downtown venues. That made the whole conference feel less overwhelming but also less connected.
The event is also still recovering from the pandemic, during which it laid off staff and went two years without much income. It’s switched hands since then and, as of this year, has adopted a new strategy.
Greg Rosenbaum, the SVP of programming at SXSW, said this year, the conference’s 40th anniversary, was its most “ambitious reinvention” yet. He cited changes like the new Clubhouses, for recharging, networking, and special programming, that attracted 5,000 people daily. He noted how attendees were experiencing “more of Austin and the downtown community.”
For at least the tech founders I spoke with, the conference remains immensely valuable, and everyone had the same advice: conferences like these, you get what you give.
After all, there were people to meet and panels to speak on. The Grammy-nominated Lola Young performed, Vox threw a hot party, the new Boots Riley film premiered, while Serena Williams and Steven Spielberg had keynotes. (I also moderated a panel about AI and taboo topics like relationships and money, which was pretty good if you ask me.)
Ashley Tryner-Dolce, an investor and founder, said the conference was still an “incredible gathering of ideas.” Like many festivals, though, she found the most “meaningful moments” happened at the side events — like INC’s Founder House party, where she connected with other founders and CEOs.
Disrupt 2026: The tech ecosystem, all in one room
Your next round. Your next hire. Your next breakout opportunity. Find it at TechCrunch Disrupt 2026, where 10,000+ founders, investors, and tech leaders gather for three days of 250+ tactical sessions, powerful introductions, and market-defining innovation. Register now to save up to $400.
Save up to $300 or 30% to TechCrunch Founder Summit
1,000+ founders and investors come together at TechCrunch Founder Summit 2026 for a full day focused on growth, execution, and real-world scaling. Learn from founders and investors who have shaped the industry. Connect with peers navigating similar growth stages. Walk away with tactics you can apply immediately
Offer ends March 13.
“It’s less about the main stage and more about who you’re sitting across from,” she said.
James Norman, a managing partner at Black Ops VC, didn’t even have a proper badge to the festival. He threw an event to connect founders with opportunities and attended some film screenings and dinners.
“If you’re just showing up without the right connections or proximity to the rooms and conversations that matter, you’re going to struggle to unlock the real value of the event,” he said, which is exactly what Jonathan Sperber, a founder who participated in the SXSW pitch competition, also expressed.
“The value tends to depend on how well you prepare for it,” Sperber said, adding that his team made sure to have meetings lined up and a clear strategy going in. He called it an “effective setting for connecting with large enterprises and other key stakeholders.”
The talk of SXSW being dead has circled the industry for years, but that never seems to be the case. For every batch of tiring founders, emerges a crop of fresh eyes and ambition, ready to take advantage of what lies in the festival’s wake.
For example, this was Simon Davis’ first SXSW. He said that his overall impression was that it was “a media conference with a tech angle, not the other way around.” He praised the diversity of the event compared to other tech events (which we will spare to mentioning).
“At SXSW, you get a much wider range of people, backgrounds, and experience levels,” he continued. “The live music programming reinforces that. It’s a different energy entirely. Not somewhere you’d necessarily go to do deals as a tech company, but a great place to share and learn.”
This year, SXSW introduced a new badging system, meaning each person had a different experience, depending on what track badge they bought — film, music, or tech. I, for example, felt surrounded by conversations about AI and technology, and overheard other tech people talking about how the festival once had a stronger music focus (though it did seem, for sure, that there were more tech-focused panels this year than music showcases or film opportunities).
The conference also eliminated the secondary access that let people with, say, music badges get into film events. Instead, people had to buy the all-in-one premium badge for around $2,000. It also introduced a reservation system (to help with lines), where badge holders had to book time for whatever they wanted to do. That was true even for those with a platinum badge, like Sperber.
As a result, he said the festival didn’t feel like a place where anyone could just show up, and noted that some events booked up so quickly they were difficult to get into. The decentralized bit also made it harder to get around than he would have liked.
“I liked the openness and the ability to meet folks from all life experiences, got to really understand the city, and some of the interactive exhibits were very interesting,” he said.
Rosenbaum said the team made the decision to get rid of secondary access after hearing feedback that attendees want more of a “streamlined access across the badges, as well as more benefits for Platinum badges.” They also lowered the price of the platinum badge to make the all-in-one option more affordable. Reservations, meanwhile, will return next year, he said, citing positive feedback (aside from a few technical errors and capacity confusion). “We will certainly adjust and refine them as needed,” he said.
Norman described it as more of an “unconference” now, at least from his perspective. He said the event was more flexible, allowing people to move around, meet people, and then go to other places.
Rodney Williams, the co-founder of the fintech SoLo Funds, has also noticed a change, but again, it’s not necessarily a bad one. He’s been going to SXSW for more than a decade and has hosted events and spoken on panels. Usually, he goes for the entire festival, but this year, he decided to go only for a few days, throwing his own events and avoiding lines.
He said that for tech founders, SXSW has “moved from an intimate, scrappy discovery zone to a high-cost, high-competition space,” focused on “investor interaction and experiential marketing” — meaning companies with big budgets can put on the big activations and get more eyeballs.
“If you are attending for the first time or don’t have access to the right events or connections, the event can definitely prove to be tricky,” Williams said.
Adweek reported fewer spectacles overall and said that there was an absence of big tech companies advertising. Williams elucidated that even with the lack of big tech companies, advertising is still a big-bucks game.
“Companies with massive marketing budgets are usually the only ones participating, launching products, or throwing pricey events,” he said. “It wasn’t always like this, and that shift has taken away opportunities from the emerging tech companies that used to participate.”
Williams added, “Now, standing out requires more than just a great product, demanding significant marketing investment that only companies with huge budgets can do.”
That didn’t stop him from throwing a party this year. Norman either. In fact, the organizers expected around 300,000 people to show up this year (final numbers won’t be available until April), revealing that the conference has yet to lose its steam or its magic.
“I always enjoy it and make the most out of it,” Williams said.

Facts Only

SXSW 2024 was held in Austin, Texas, in March, marking the festival’s 40th anniversary.
The event was two days shorter than previous years and decentralized due to the demolition of the Austin Convention Center.
SXSW introduced "Clubhouses" for networking and recharging, attracting 5,000 people daily.
The festival adopted a new badging system, eliminating secondary access between tracks (film, music, tech) and requiring reservations for events.
Platinum badges, costing around $2,000, were the only way to access all tracks.
Greg Rosenbaum, SVP of programming at SXSW, described the 2024 edition as the festival’s most "ambitious reinvention."
Notable speakers and performers included Serena Williams, Steven Spielberg, Lola Young, and Boots Riley.
The festival faced financial challenges post-pandemic, including staff layoffs and two years of reduced income.
Attendees reported mixed experiences, with some praising the diversity and networking opportunities, while others criticized the high costs and logistical difficulties.
Tech founders emphasized the importance of preparation and connections to maximize the event’s value.
Rodney Williams, co-founder of SoLo Funds, noted a shift from an "intimate, scrappy discovery zone" to a "high-cost, high-competition space."
Organizers expected around 300,000 attendees, with final numbers to be released in April.

Executive Summary

SXSW 2024 marked its 40th anniversary with significant changes, including a shorter duration, decentralized venues due to the demolition of the Austin Convention Center, and a new badging system that restricted cross-track access. The festival, still recovering from pandemic-era layoffs and financial strain, introduced "Clubhouses" for networking and recharging, attracting 5,000 daily attendees. While some tech founders praised the event’s value for networking and idea exchange, others noted challenges like limited accessibility, high costs, and the need for strategic preparation to maximize benefits. The event’s shift toward high-budget activations and investor-focused interactions was evident, with fewer big tech companies advertising but still significant corporate presence. Attendees experienced a mix of tech, music, and film programming, though the new reservation system and badge restrictions led to mixed feedback. Despite criticisms, SXSW retained its appeal, drawing an estimated 300,000 attendees and maintaining its role as a cultural and professional hub.
The festival’s evolution reflects broader trends in the tech and media industries, where accessibility and inclusivity are increasingly tied to financial resources. While some long-time attendees lamented the loss of the festival’s scrappy, intimate feel, newcomers appreciated its diversity and interdisciplinary energy. The changes—such as streamlined badge access and reservations—were intended to improve attendee experience but also highlighted tensions between exclusivity and openness. Ultimately, SXSW’s enduring relevance lies in its ability to adapt while preserving its core as a convergence point for innovation, culture, and connection.

Full Take

**STEELMAN:** SXSW 2024 demonstrates resilience and adaptability in the face of structural and financial challenges. The festival’s decentralization and new badging system reflect a deliberate effort to streamline access and enhance attendee experience, even if the changes introduced friction. The emphasis on high-profile speakers, networking hubs, and experiential marketing aligns with broader industry trends where value is increasingly tied to curated, exclusive interactions. The event’s enduring appeal—despite criticisms—suggests it still serves as a vital nexus for creativity, innovation, and cultural exchange.
**PATTERN SCAN:** The narrative subtly frames SXSW’s evolution as a natural progression rather than a concession to commercial pressures. The focus on "ambitious reinvention" and "streamlined access" could obscure the exclusionary effects of higher costs and restricted badge tiers. There’s an implicit appeal to authority in citing organizers’ justifications for changes, which may downplay dissenting attendee experiences. The contrast between the festival’s scrappy origins and its current high-budget, investor-driven model hints at a broader tension in tech and media ecosystems: the commodification of access and opportunity.
**ROOT CAUSE:** The paradigm driving this narrative is the tension between democratization and commodification in cultural and professional spaces. SXSW’s shifts mirror the tech industry’s broader trajectory, where early-stage openness gives way to consolidation, higher barriers to entry, and a focus on scalable, monetizable interactions. The unstated assumption is that adaptation is inherently positive, even when it privileges those with resources over emergent voices.
**IMPLICATIONS:** For human agency, the changes at SXSW reflect a narrowing of opportunities for those without established networks or financial means. The festival’s value increasingly depends on pre-existing connections, reinforcing inequalities in tech and media. Second-order consequences include the potential homogenization of ideas, as smaller players struggle to compete with high-budget activations. The event’s cultural role may also shift, prioritizing deal-making over serendipitous discovery.
**BRIDGE QUESTIONS:**
How might SXSW balance exclusivity with accessibility to preserve its role as a platform for emerging voices?
What alternative models could festivals adopt to resist the commodification of cultural and professional spaces?
If the festival’s value is now tied to "who you’re sitting across from," what does that mean for the future of organic networking and idea exchange?
**COUNTERSTRIKE SCAN:** A coordinated influence campaign might frame SXSW’s changes as an inevitable and positive evolution, downplaying criticisms as nostalgia or resistance to progress. It could amplify voices praising the festival’s "reinvention" while marginalizing dissent as outdated. The actual content does not fully align with this pattern, as it includes critical perspectives and acknowledges trade-offs. However, the framing of changes as "ambitious" and "streamlined" could be leveraged to normalize exclusionary practices under the guise of innovation.
Patterns detected: ARC-0024 Ambiguity (implied progress without addressing trade-offs), ARC-0043 Motte-and-Bailey (celebrating adaptation while obscuring its costs).

Sentinel — Human

Confidence

This text exhibits signs of being written by a human, with erratic sentence length variance, idiosyncratic emphasis, and personal voice. However, it does not show strong evidence against synthetic origin.

Signals Detected
low severity: Sentence length variance shows some erratic behavior, suggesting a human author
medium severity: The text exhibits idiosyncratic emphasis and personal voice, indicative of a human writer
low severity: While there are mentions of TechCrunch events, the article does not present argumentative skeletons or talking points that align with known AI-generated content patterns
Human Indicators
The article includes unique perspectives and anecdotes from various individuals, supporting a human origin