Farmers using cover crops are planting more acres, finding new ways to integrate livestock, and increasingly turning to technology such as drones, according to the newly released 2026 National Cover Crop Report.
The report, released this week during the Farm Progress Show, found that surveyed farmers planted an average of nearly 398 acres of cover crops, with respondents expecting that figure to surpass 400 acres next year. Nearly half of the cover crop users surveyed had more than a decade of experience with the practice.
This year’s survey included responses from 657 farmers across 46 states and Puerto Rico.
“We work closely with agricultural producers to implement conservation practices — like cover crops — that strengthen soil health and ensure long-term productivity and profitability of our nation’s agricultural operations,” said Farm Production and Conservation Under Secretary Richard Fordyce. “USDA is putting farmers first through our conservation programs and technical assistance, and we thank farmers for their voluntary efforts to conserve our nation’s natural resources while feeding, fueling and clothing our nation.”
Beyond acreage, the survey highlighted potential production benefits. Farmers reported an average yield increase of 3.5 bushels per acre for corn and 1.4 bushels per acre for soybeans following cover crops.
Nearly one-third, 31.2 percent, of cover crop users also reported better weed control. Among farmers who “planted green,” or planted their cash crop into a living cover crop, 87 percent reported improved weed control.
“The National Cover Crop Report has become a benchmark in tracking not only the growing use of cover crops, but also the growing appreciation of cover crops’ benefits and understanding of how farmers succeed with the practice,” said Rob Myers of the University of Missouri, who has led the survey program since its inception. “Data from these surveys has been used in farmer outreach programs on cover crops and conservation policy development. Every time we conduct one of these surveys, we gather new insights to share, and this year was no exception.”
The Conservation Technology Information Center, USDA Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program, and American Seed Trade Association conducted the survey, which is the ninth National Cover Crop Report published by CTIC and SARE since 2013.
Cover crop use isn’t always consistent
One of this year’s findings challenges the idea that farmers can simply be divided into cover crop “users” and “non-users.”
Farmers who had previously planted cover crops were instead classified as “intermittent users,” reflecting how weather, economics, crop rotations, and other conditions can affect planting decisions.
Among those intermittent users, 28.6 percent said they definitely or probably would consider using cover crops again, while another 34.7 percent said they might.
More than 60 percent of current cover crop users said there are years when they don’t plant covers on certain fields.
A late cash crop harvest was cited by 41.8 percent of respondents as a reason for skipping cover crops, while 38.6 percent pointed to conditions being too wet or dry. Another 38 percent cited a lack of time or labor.
Even among respondents who had never planted cover crops, 73.5 percent said they were open to trying them.
“Though many fans of cover crops can’t imagine not using them, other farmers choose whether or not to plant covers based on economics, field conditions, crop rotations, or other factors,” said CTIC Executive Director and Iowa farmer Ryan Heiniger. “In the past, research had a tendency to group people as ‘users’ or ‘non-users.’ We’ve learned — and through this survey, confirmed — that intermittent use of cover crops can be a dynamic decision, not an abandonment of the practice or its principles. Better data showing a positive return on investment and incentive programs to help cover the costs of cover crop establishment could bring cover crops back to many of those acres.”
Incentives could influence adoption
Financial incentives also appear to play a role in whether farmers try — and continue using — cover crops.
Among 256 cover crop users who received an incentive payment in 2025, 81.6 percent said they probably or definitely would continue using cover crops. Just 4.7 percent said they probably would not continue after their incentive program ended.
Among previous or intermittent users, only 21.6 percent reported receiving some type of cover crop incentive. Of those farmers, 70 percent said the payments encouraged them to try cover crops by reducing financial risk or offsetting direct costs.
The survey also found that farmers favored programs with simple enrollment and clearly defined terms.
For cover crop users who hadn’t participated in incentive programs, unfamiliarity with carbon markets or program details was a leading obstacle. Concerns about long-term commitments were cited by 32.4 percent, while 19.6 percent said payments were insufficient and 14.7 percent cited eligibility requirements.
Cattle and cover crops
Livestock integration emerged as another significant opportunity.
One-third of cover crop users said they either grazed their cover crops or harvested them for livestock feed. Of the farmers who grazed covers, 77 percent said doing so increased their profits.
Interest in virtual fencing could further expand grazing. Among respondents interested in virtual fencing technology, 85 percent said it would increase their use of cover crop grazing.
Because roughly two-thirds of surveyed cover crop users aren’t currently grazing those acres, the report also points to opportunities for crop farmers to partner with cattle producers looking for additional forage.
Drones gain ground in cover crop management
Drone use is also beginning to make its way into cover crop systems.
This year, 16.3 percent of cover crop users reported using drones for cover crop seeding or termination. That’s a significant shift from the 2023 National Cover Crop Report, when only one out of 553 cover crop users reported seeding cover crops with a drone.
The survey also examined where farmers source their cover crop seed and how those purchasing decisions are changing.
“The cover crop survey is an invaluable resource for the seed industry,” said Andy LaVigne, president and CEO of ASTA. “It helps seed producers understand trends and ensure a reliable supply of high-quality, professionally produced cover crop seed. By utilizing the information in this survey, the seed industry can help support conservation efforts by ensuring growers have access to the right seed, at the right time, to achieve their conservation goals, leading to a more secure and reliable food supply and a healthier environment.”
The full 2026 National Cover Crop Report, along with previous reports dating to 2013, is available through CTIC.
Facts Only
* Surveyed farmers planted an average of nearly 398 acres of cover crops.
* Respondents expect this figure to surpass 400 acres next year.
* Nearly half of surveyed cover crop users had more than a decade of experience with the practice.
* The survey included responses from 657 farmers across 46 states and Puerto Rico.
* Farmers reported an average yield increase of 3.5 bushels per acre for corn following cover crops.
* Farmers reported an average yield increase of 1.4 bushels per acre for soybeans following cover crops.
* 31.2 percent of cover crop users reported better weed control.
* 87 percent of farmers who planted their cash crop into a living cover crop reported improved weed control.
* One-third of cover crop users either grazed their covers or harvested them for livestock feed.
* 77 percent of farmers who grazed their covers reported increased profits.
* 16.3 percent of cover crop users reported using drones for cover crop seeding or termination in 2025.
* 81.6 percent of cover crop users who received an incentive payment in 2025 said they would continue using cover crops.
Executive Summary
Farmers are increasingly utilizing cover crops, planting an average of nearly 398 acres and expecting this figure to exceed 400 acres next year. This practice is associated with production benefits, including an average yield increase of 3.5 bushels per acre for corn and 1.4 bushels per acre for soybeans. Nearly one-third of cover crop users reported better weed control, with 87 percent of those who planted cash crops into green cover reporting improved weed control. The survey included responses from 657 farmers across 46 states and Puerto Rico.
The adoption rate is variable; farmers who previously planted cover crops were classified as intermittent users, reflecting dynamic decision-making based on conditions such as weather, economics, and crop rotations. Among these intermittent users, a significant portion indicated they would consider resuming the practice. Financial incentives have influenced adoption, as 81.6 percent of cover crop users who received an incentive payment in 2025 indicated they would continue using them. However, unfamiliarity with carbon markets or concerns over long-term commitments presented obstacles for some.
Opportunities exist for livestock integration, with one-third of cover crop users grazing their covers or harvesting them for feed, and interest in virtual fencing to expand grazing. Furthermore, the use of technology is emerging, as 16.3 percent of users reported using drones for seeding or termination. The information gathered from the survey is intended to inform conservation policy development and farmer outreach.
Full Take
The narrative shifts from a simple adoption story to an exploration of dynamic implementation and systemic barriers. The classification of farmers as "intermittent users" fundamentally challenges a static dichotomy between "users" and "non-users," suggesting that practice is less about commitment and more about context-dependent, adaptive decision-making driven by immediate economic pressures and environmental variability. This observation introduces a critical layer: the perceived failure or success of a conservation technique can be entirely contextual rather than absolute.
The role of financial incentives demonstrates a complex relationship between policy intervention and behavior. While payments can mitigate initial risk for some, the data suggests that true long-term sustained adoption requires addressing deeper structural concerns regarding commitment, transparency in market mechanisms (like carbon markets), and the perceived cost vs. benefit calculation over extended timelines. The fact that most users who received incentives intended to continue using cover crops highlights that incentives address immediate financial barriers but do not resolve underlying epistemological or temporal uncertainties about long-term stewardship.
Furthermore, the emerging integration of technology like drones alongside traditional practices suggests that future success in conservation may depend less on adherence to a prescribed practice and more on the farmer's capacity to integrate novel tools into existing adaptive frameworks. The tension between established methods and emerging technology, alongside the persistence of economic variability dictating intermittent use, implies that the most resilient farming systems will likely be those characterized by flexible integration, where diverse practices are chosen based on localized, real-time feedback loops rather than monolithic adherence to a single standard.
Bridge Questions: If incentives successfully mitigate initial risk but fail to secure long-term commitment, what structural changes in policy or market design are necessary to foster greater trust in long-term ecological outcomes? How can research be designed to track the efficacy of dynamic, intermittent use versus consistent application across varied field conditions? What is the relationship between the adoption of novel technologies and the perceived sense of autonomy among farmers making conservation decisions?
