Physics > General Physics
[Submitted on 23 Jul 2026]
Title:Groups of Worldview Transformations Implied by Einstein's Special Principle of Relativity over Arbitrary Ordered Fields
View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:In 1978, Yu. F. Borisov presented an axiom system using a few basic assumptions and four explicit axioms, the fourth being a formulation of the relativity principle; and he demonstrated that this axiom system had (up to choice of units) only two models: a relativistic one in which worldview transformations are Poincaré transformations and a classical one in which they are Galilean. In this paper, we reformulate Borisov's original four axioms within an intuitively simple, but strictly formal, first-order logic framework, and convert his basic background assumptions into explicit axioms. Instead of assuming that the structure of physical quantities is the field of real numbers, we assume only that they form an ordered field. This allows us to investigate how Borisov's theorem depends on the structure of quantities.
We demonstrate (as our main contribution) how to construct Euclidean, Galilean, and Poincaré models of Borisov's axiom system over every non-Archimedean field. We also demonstrate the existence of an infinite descending chain of models and transformation groups in each of these three cases, something that is not possible over Archimedean fields.
As an application, we note that there is a model of Borisov's axioms that satisfies the relativity principle, and in which the worldview transformations are Euclidean isometries. Over the field of reals it is easy to eliminate this model using natural axioms concerning time's arrow and the absence of instantaneous motion. In the case of non-Archimedean fields, however, the Euclidean isometries appear intrinsically as worldview transformations in models of Borisov's axioms and neither the assumption of time's arrow, nor the rejection of instantaneous motion, can eliminate them.
Current browse context:
physics.gen-ph
References & Citations
Loading...
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Facts Only
* Yu. F. Borisov presented an axiom system in 1978 with four explicit axioms, including a formulation of the relativity principle.
* This axiom system has two models: one with Poincaré transformations (relativistic) and one with Galilean transformations (classical).
* The work reformulates Borisov's axioms using first-order logic, assuming quantities form an ordered field.
* Constructible Euclidean, Galilean, and Poincaré models of the axiom system exist over every non-Archimedean field.
* An infinite descending chain of models and transformation groups exists in these three cases over non-Archimedean fields.
* A model satisfying the relativity principle with Euclidean isometries exists over the field of reals.
* In non-Archimedean fields, Euclidean isometries appear intrinsically as worldview transformations in Borisov's axiom models.
Executive Summary
Full Take
Sentinel — Human
The text exhibits the highly specialized, mathematically dense structure characteristic of academic research, suggesting human generation by a specialist.
