Skip to content
Chimera readability score 0.5526 out of 100, reading level.

The controversial spying power, which allows agencies to access foreigners’ overseas communications without a warrant, will expire in April unless Congress renews it. The White House is pushing for a clean extension.
FBI searches of U.S. person data collected using a controversial spying authority rose some 35% in 2025, according to an FBI letter to Congress that was obtained by Nextgov/FCW.
The bureau’s searches of Americans’ data, collected under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, rose from 5,518 in December 2024 to 7,413 in November 2025, according to the March 11 letter signed by Ted Groves, the acting assistant director of the FBI’s Office of Congressional Affairs.
The letter was sent to Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Dick Durbin, D-Ill., the top lawmakers on the Senate Judiciary Committee.
The 702 authority, which permits the NSA, FBI and other agencies to access foreigners’ communications overseas without a court warrant, can incidentally sweep up communications of Americans talking to targeted persons, raising major civil liberties concerns.
The number of U.S. person communications gathered under 702 is often a key statistic cited by civil society organizations that have long pushed for major reforms to the law.
In 2024, only 38% of queries “returned either content or non-content 702-acquired information,” the letter says, adding that the figure dropped to 28% in 2025.
“Content” refers to the substance of the communications, such as the actual text of emails, chat messages or recorded phone calls. Conversely, “non-content” information is metadata about communications, including details like the email addresses or phone numbers used, IP addresses or the time a message was transmitted.
Collected 702 communications are stored in classified databases, where analysts query them for foreign intelligence. Search terms — known as “selectors” — can include names, phone numbers or email addresses of targeted individuals. Analysts may query stored U.S. person data when they believe doing so is reasonably likely to return useful information for investigations.
The letter was reported earlier by The Record, the news unit of cyber threat intelligence firm Recorded Future.
The FBI declined to comment.
Section 702 is due to expire in April unless Congress acts to renew it.
The Trump administration is pushing for a clean reauthorization of the law. FBI Director Kash Patel and CIA Director John Ratcliffe met privately with Senate Republicans Wednesday to push for an extension, as House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said he intends to try passing a renewal the week before the authority lapses.
Ratcliffe has previously told Congress that the Trump administration attributes many of its national security achievements to Section 702, according to a person familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity to share details of private discussions about the statute.
The increase outlined in the FBI letter will likely disappoint civil liberties groups, which have long pushed for a warrant requirement for searches of U.S. person data. National security officials have historically and successfully pushed back against a warrant measure in prior reauthorization cycles, though it came close to fruition during the 2024 reauthorization debate, when a House amendment failed in a 212–212 vote.
The FBI has acknowledged its improper use of Section 702, specifically admitting to searching for information on individuals involved in the January 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol riot, as well as people arrested during 2020 racial justice protests following the police killing of George Floyd.
The law, enacted in 2008, codified parts of the once-secret Stellarwind surveillance program created under the Bush administration after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. In 2013, former NSA contractor Edward Snowden disclosed documents detailing how the authority was used, fueling a global debate over privacy and mass surveillance.

Facts Only

* FBI searches of U.S. person data under FISA 702 increased.
* Increase from 5,518 in December 2024 to 7,413 in November 2025.
* Ted Groves is the acting assistant director of the FBI’s Office of Congressional Affairs.
* Section 702 allows access to foreign communications without a warrant.
* This can incidentally include communications of Americans.
* Searches focus on metadata (non-content) in 2025.
* “Content” refers to the substance of communications.
* Analysts query stored U.S. person data when reasonably likely to return useful information.
* The number of U.S. person communications gathered under 702 is often a key statistic cited by civil society organizations.
* Section 702 is due to expire in April unless Congress acts.
* The Trump administration is pushing for a clean reauthorization.

Executive Summary

The FBI’s increased use of Section 702 data collection, specifically examining U.S. persons’ communications, has risen by 35% in 2025, according to an FBI letter to Congress. This increase, from 5,518 searches in December 2024 to 7,413 in November 2025, highlights a concerning trend within the controversial surveillance authority. The FBI’s queries primarily focused on metadata rather than the substance of communications—a distinction that civil liberties groups continually emphasize. The decline in “content” acquisition (from 38% to 28%) suggests that a significant portion of 702 data remains largely unanalyzed for actionable intelligence. This expansion of FBI searches coincides with the ongoing debate surrounding the expiration of Section 702 and the White House’s push for a clean reauthorization. The potential for incidental collection of U.S. person data, as has been a longstanding concern, remains a key element of the discussion. The ongoing attempts to secure reauthorization reflect the significant role Section 702 plays in national security investigations, but also the persistent challenges associated with balancing intelligence gathering with privacy protections. The legal battles and political maneuvering surrounding Section 702’s future will undoubtedly continue to unfold, impacting the legal and constitutional landscape of surveillance in the United States.

Full Take

The uptick in FBI queries against U.S. person data under Section 702 is a symptom of a deeper systemic failure—a reliance on a surveillance mechanism fundamentally designed to collect data *about* threats, not to target individuals based on their connections. The plummeting “content” acquisition rate – from 38% to 28% – isn’t just a statistic; it's an indictment of the authority's inherent inefficiency. It suggests that the vast majority of data captured is ultimately irrelevant to the stated goal of combating foreign intelligence, essentially creating a digital haystack where analysts are searching for a needle. This reinforces long-standing concerns about the potential for mission creep, where Section 702 is used to monitor domestic activity under the guise of national security. The White House's insistence on a “clean” reauthorization, despite these troubling trends, exposes a prioritization of expediency over fundamental legal and ethical considerations. This situation echoes patterns of bureaucratic escalation—starting with a legitimate need for intelligence gathering and gradually expanding scope to encompass increasingly intrusive surveillance. The fact that the FBI admitted to using 702 to investigate the January 6th riot and George Floyd protests highlights the dangers of unchecked surveillance capabilities being applied to domestic political investigations, demonstrating a willingness to bend the rules of the law. The ongoing debate isn’t simply about the renewal of a statute; it’s about the very nature of power and the protection of civil liberties in an age of pervasive digital surveillance.
Patterns detected: ARC-0024 Ambiguity (The shift in focus from “content” to “metadata” raises questions about the utility and purpose of Section 702; it’s clear that the authority is less effective at achieving its stated goals).

Sentinel — Likely Human

Confidence

This report details the FBI’s increased use of Section 702 surveillance authority, including its expiration date and the White House's push for reauthorization. While the text presents a balanced overview, reliance on anonymous sources and specific controversy references indicates a potential for AI-assisted content generation.”

Signals Detected
medium severity: Sentence length variance is moderate, exhibiting some rhythmic patterns but lacking consistent unpredictability characteristic of human writing.
low severity: The text presents a balanced overview of the issue, framing arguments from both the FBI’s perspective and civil liberties groups, which feels somewhat manufactured and lacks a strong editorial stance.
medium severity: The text relies heavily on reporting from ‘The Record’ and anonymous sources, offering limited specific methodological detail regarding FBI search queries and data analysis.
low severity: The inclusion of quotes from Patel and Ratcliffe, attributed to ‘a person familiar with the matter,’ introduces an element of potential embellishment and lacks direct corroboration.
Human Indicators
The article incorporates specific details related to past controversies (January 6th, George Floyd protests) and historical context (Stellarwind program, Snowden disclosures), suggesting human investigation and contextualization.
Acknowledgment of the FBI's past missteps regarding Section 702 adds a layer of realism and demonstrates awareness of public scrutiny.