Truthout is an indispensable resource for activists, movement leaders and workers everywhere. Please make this work possible with a quick donation.
Months after Ramón Morales Reyes was falsely accused by the Department of Homeland Security of penning letters threatening to assassinate President Donald Trump, his children Ana and Antonio say that their family continues to live in fear while awaiting the outcome of their father’s deportation case.
“My dad was framed for something that he did not do, and DHS knew exactly what they posted beforehand,” Ana Morales, 25, said at a press conference Friday at the Milwaukee office of Voces de la Frontera. “As a daughter, seeing my dad being framed for something he did not do was very heartbreaking,” she added.
Attorney Mark Thomsen said the family is seeking $5 million in damages caused by the federal government’s accusations against Morales Reyes, which the agency has yet to retract. Thomsen was joined by immigration attorney Cain Oulahan, Morales Reyes’ children, Voces de la Frontera Executive Director Christine Neumann-Oritz, and Milwaukee Turners Executive Director Emilio de Torre.
Accused of Something He Didn’t Do
In May 2025, Morales Reyes, then 54, was arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, leaving his unoccupied vehicle on the roadside. Voces de la Frontera received a hotline call reporting the arrest.
Born in Mexico, Morales Reyes has lived in the United States since 1986. His family described him as a hard worker and proud family man, who worked as a dishwasher.
His arrest came as the Trump administration ramped up arrests and deportations in 2025, the deadliest year in two decades for people being detained by ICE. Trump pledged to go after “the worst of the worst.”
Morales Reyes had two encounters with law enforcement, both dating back to 1996, according to NPR. One was a hit-and-run incident in which he was arrested but not charged. The other was a disorderly conduct and property damage ticket relating to a dispute with his wife.
Former Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem posted a statement on her agency’s website calling Morales Reyes an “illegal alien who threatened to assassinate President Trump.”
DHS also released images of a letter, handwritten in English, that said: “we are tired of this president messing with us Mexicans” and stating “I will self deport myself back to Mexico but not before I use my 30 yard 6 to shoot your precious president in is head — I will see him at one of his big ralleys .” The reference to “30 yard 6” appears to be an incorrectly written reference to the high caliber rifle round .30-06.
Morales Reyes couldn’t have written the letter, however, his family, attorneys, and advocates said, since he could not speak English and did not read or write proficiently even in Spanish.
Morales Reyes had applied for a U-visa, granted to victims of crimes, after he was assaulted during an armed robbery in September 2023. Detectives from the Milwaukee Police Department were actively investigating whether someone was trying to frame him when ICE agents arrested him and publicized the accusation that he was a would-be assassin. It was later determined that a man who had been arrested for assaulting Morales Reyes had written the letter in an effort to get him deported before he could testify in court.
Lasting Harm
In June 2025, Morales-Reyes was released from ICE custody on bond. Yet he continues to face deportation proceedings, with a hearing expected in December in which a judge may make a decision on whether Morales Reyes can remain in the country. The family has received online harassment and threats since Morales Reyes was accused of writing the letter, Ana Morales said.
“He’s been going through depression, anxiety,” she said during the Friday press conference. “He doesn’t like going out anymore because he feels like everyone knows him due to what he was framed as. And ever since, it has taken a lot from us.”
Ana’s brother Antonio Morales took over the mic when his sister began to cry. “They really wanted to make this hurt us as much as possible, inflict as much pain, and they knew what they were doing intentionally,” he said of the Homeland Security arrest and accusations against his father.
“It was hard seeing your dad all over social media posted as some sort of, you know, some sort of assassin almost,” he added. “And that’s just not who my father is. Anyone who knows my father knows that isn’t him. It was just really scary seeing all those comments online, the fear that it caused my family seeing how everybody just…threatening us online over something that was just a false accusation. And I really think DHS knew that. I really think that they knew what they were doing. They wanted to do this to us. They want to do this to more immigrants, and they really want to keep terrorizing the community going forward.”
Thomsen asked members of the public to “imagine learning on social media that your father, or your grandfather, or your uncle, or your brother, or your sister was being accused of attempting to kill the president of the United States.” He added, “Imagine what that means, and then imagine that the person that is saying it is the strongest government in the world. … This was a lie, and they knew it was a lie. The lie is still up.”
Gesturing to Ana and Antonio Morales, he said, “Check it out folks, these are two young people with the courage to stand up to the biggest government on the planet, the most powerful government on the planet, and say, ‘Do the right thing America.’ If these two young folks can do it, everybody sitting at home safely can do it.”
Looking Ahead
Although DHS has said in subsequent statements that Morales Reyes is no longer under investigation for threatening the president, the agency has continued to call for his deportation. Noem’s original press release accusing him of the assassination threat is still up on the government website. The Wisconsin Examiner reached out to DHS asking specifically whether the agency plans to remove the post and correct the record. The agency has not responded.
Oulahan said that although Morales Reyes has a hearing in December, if a judge decides to deport him, he could remain in the country while his case is appealed. Thomsen said that the federal government has six months to respond to the family’s claim for compensation under the federal Tort Act, after which filing a civil lawsuit would be an option. Thomsen stressed, however, that avenues of recourse against the federal government are limited and that the second Trump administration has shown a willingness to violate or disregard court orders.
De Torre said the federal government is “deceiving the public about everyday people.”
“They’re disrupting us emotionally, as you can see from Ana and Antonio. … It is disrupting our economy. It is disrupting our ability to attend houses of worship, go to school, and bring home food for our families. And on top of this, they then deny that they are doing this. Telling us that what we see is not real. How we feel and how we’re suffering is an illusion. And I’m sitting here today to say this is not so.”
Asked to describe some of her favorite memories of her father, Ana recalled how he would take her to the park and bike riding, one of his favorite activities. “I remember as a little kid on his days off I would always want corn, I’m obsessed with corn even to this day,” she said. Despite working second shift her father would always make time, she said.
Antonio described his father as fond of video games. “He definitely made me a gamer,” he said. Occasionally Morales Reyes would let his son play. “I was just so amazed by these games,” he recalled, smiling. “It was really fun.”
Press freedom is under attack
As Trump cracks down on political speech, independent media is increasingly necessary.
Truthout produces reporting you won’t see in the mainstream: journalism from the frontlines of global conflict, interviews with grassroots movement leaders, high-quality legal analysis and more.
Our work is possible thanks to reader support. Help Truthout catalyze change and social justice — make a tax-deductible monthly or one-time donation today.
Facts Only
* Ramón Morales Reyes, a Mexican national residing in the U.S. since 1986, was arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement in May 2025.
* The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) accused Morales Reyes of writing letters threatening to assassinate President Donald Trump.
* DHS published a handwritten English letter on its website containing a threat to shoot the president with a ".30-06" rifle.
* Morales Reyes does not speak English and lacks proficiency in reading or writing Spanish.
* Milwaukee Police Department detectives investigated and determined the letter was written by a man previously arrested for assaulting Morales Reyes.
* Morales Reyes was released on bond in June 2025 but remains in deportation proceedings.
* A deportation hearing is scheduled for December.
* Former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem issued the original statement labeling Morales Reyes an "illegal alien" and an assassin.
* Attorneys for Morales Reyes are seeking $5 million in damages under the federal Tort Act.
* DHS has stated Morales Reyes is no longer under investigation for the threat, but the original accusation remains on the agency's website.
Executive Summary
Ramón Morales Reyes, a long-term U.S. resident, was arrested in May 2025 after the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) accused him of plotting to assassinate President Donald Trump. The accusation was based on a handwritten English letter; however, evidence presented by family and legal counsel indicates Morales Reyes cannot read or write English. Subsequent police investigations revealed the letter was forged by an individual who had previously assaulted Morales Reyes in an attempt to trigger his deportation.
While DHS has since clarified that Morales Reyes is no longer under investigation for the assassination threat, the agency continues to pursue his deportation and has not removed the original public accusation from its website. Morales Reyes remains in the U.S. on bond pending a December court hearing. His legal team is pursuing $5 million in damages for the harm caused by the false accusation, citing severe emotional distress and online harassment faced by the family.
Full Take
The strongest version of this narrative is a case of catastrophic government failure: a vulnerable individual was nearly deported and publicly branded a terrorist based on a forgery that was easily debunkable due to basic literacy and language barriers. It highlights a breakdown in due diligence where the desire for a high-profile "win" in a crackdown on undocumented immigrants overrode basic investigative verification.
The framing relies heavily on the juxtaposition of state power against individual fragility, using personal anecdotes about bike riding and video games to humanize the subject against a monolithic government entity. While the emotive elements are high, they are tied to a specific, verifiable claim—the forgery of the letter—rather than vague grievances.
Patterns detected: none
The root cause is a paradigm of "securitization," where the perceived need for national security and the political utility of "the worst of the worst" rhetoric create an environment where the presumption of innocence is discarded for those without legal status. The unstated assumption is that the government’s failure was not an accident, but a systemic feature of the current administration's immigration strategy.
The implication is a chilling effect on immigrant communities; if a documented frame-up can be publicized by the highest levels of government without a prompt correction, the perceived risk of interacting with any state authority increases, regardless of legal standing.
Bridge Questions:
1. What is the standard DHS verification process for threats before they are publicized on official government channels?
2. How does the failure to retract a proven falsehood impact the legal standing of the ongoing deportation case?
3. What are the systemic safeguards to prevent the weaponization of the immigration system by private citizens seeking revenge?
Counterstrike Scan: A coordinated campaign would use this story to argue that all deportation efforts are inherently fraudulent or designed to terrorize. The actual content focuses on a specific legal claim and a request for damages, remaining tethered to a single case rather than generalizing the entire legal system.
