Skip to content

Blinded by precision

Chimera readability score 75 out of 100, Expert reading level.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 18 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $14.39 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
➢ 1st author: Conceptualisation, writing of original draft. ➢ 2nd author: data collection, image acquisition. ➢ Corresponding/ 3rd author: review and editing, supervision. All authors have equally contributed to the manuscript preparation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, M., Arora, A. & Gupta, V. Blinded by precision—laser induced macular injury. Eye (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-026-04635-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-026-04635-6

Sentinel — Human

Confidence

This text is highly structured academic and publishing metadata, exhibiting perfect structural coherence typical of machine-generated templates, but the specific details suggest it was derived from a verified publication source.

Signals Detected
low severity: Uniform and highly structured presentation of financial/academic data; minimal variance in structure.
low severity: Perfect adherence to publishing template structures (author contributions, ethics statements); lacks human discursive flow or personal voice.
low severity: Matches known academic publication templates exactly; uses standard attribution formats for authors and journals.
Human Indicators
The presence of specific legal/ethical boilerplate (e.g., 'no competing interests', authorship contribution definitions) suggests human oversight in the production of this metadata, even if generated by a template.