Truthout is an indispensable resource for activists, movement leaders and workers everywhere. Please make this work possible with a quick donation.
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) claimed this past weekend that Republicans will end up winning the 2026 midterms due in large part to God’s intervention.
Johnson appeared on the far right program “This Week on Capitol Hill,” which is hosted by Family Research Council president Tony Perkins. During the July 25 episode, Johnson claimed that Americans “trust House Republicans…to run this government,” and cited that belief as why Republicans will maintain control of Congress beyond November.
“We’re gonna win the midterms,” Johnson said. “I’m very bullish about the outcome. We talk about it all the time, and with each passing day, I’m more confident.”
Perkins responded by saying that Republicans “exceed the expectations of the pundits” who “still don’t understand the power of prayer.”
“That’s right!” Johnson exclaimed.
The House Speaker then recounted a story where he recently spoke to reporters, telling them “this is a God thing” regarding how well Republicans will do in the elections this year.
“We have intercessory prayers” — groups of people who organize to pray in person for a particular cause — “who are on the grounds at the Capitol praying each of these things through,” Johnson said of Republican-sponsored legislation.
Johnson’s comments are a nod to his broader Christian nationalist vision of how the U.S. government should be run.
Just months after Johnson became Speaker, a Congressional Freethought Caucus (CFC) report published in January 2024 highlighted his Christian nationalist views, noting that the lawmaker has “spent decades working to deny, reject, and undermine the constitutional separation of church and state, including trafficking in fake histories about our nation’s founding.”
The CFC, which is composed of around 35 lawmakers whose aim is to protect the separation between church and state, cited many of Johnson’s statements and actions over the years, including:
- His view that the First Amendment’s “Establishment Clause,” does “nothing more than prevent the state from establishing an official religion” rather than the prevailing consensus that it exists to restrict the government from implementing religious-based laws;
- His support for using public education and resources to promote evangelical Christianity;
- His promotion of anti-immigrant and anti-LGBTQ policies, oftentimes based solely on his religious views;
- His writing the forward to a right-wing book that is full of baseless conspiracy theories;
- And his past work with the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR), a growing movement in Republican circles that promotes extremist calls for Christians to “conquer” and “take dominion” over “key mountains of society” — e.g., business realms, the media, and governments.
Johnson might be overly optimistic about his party’s chances in the midterms.
According to an Economist/YouGov poll published this week, only 32 percent of Americans view Republicans in Congress favorably, while 58 percent view them unfavorably. Asked if the Republican Party is too extreme, 51 percent of respondents answered yes, while only 34 percent said the party was not.
The poll also asked respondents who they would vote for if the midterm elections were held today. Forty percent said they preferred the Democrat in their home district to win, while 34 percent said they wanted the Republican choice — a 6-point lead for Democrats just a few months out from Election Day 2026.
Important Message: Please Read
For 25 years, Truthout has survived by publishing impactful investigative journalism and analysis; distributing full editions 365 days a year; and building a community of readers who support us with small, hard-earned donations.
Eighty percent of our $3 million yearly budget comes from small donors alone. Of those, 8,000 readers support us with monthly donations. Back in 2018, when Facebook decided to suppress the circulation of posts made by organizations, thereby cutting readers off from seeing many articles shared by the news organizations they had intentionally decided to follow, Truthout’s total traffic declined by 40 percent, as nearly all of our traffic from that platform disappeared.
Now, Google has recently rolled out its AI search bar, providing AI summaries instead of directing readers to our site. Google Search is our single largest source of traffic; it’s the route by which nearly one third of our readers find us. Much like in 2018, a shocking 40 percent of our Google traffic has disappeared overnight.
It will not be easy for Truthout to shoulder this blow. Nor will it be easy for our peers and collaborators — news sites that depend on traffic and aren’t bankrolled by large corporations.
If you can support Truthout with a donation today, you can help us resist the AI onslaught. Please give today.
Facts Only
* Speaker of the House Mike Johnson claimed Republicans will win the 2026 midterms due in large part to God’s intervention.
* Johnson stated Americans "trust House Republicans…to run this government," citing this belief as why Republicans will maintain control of Congress beyond November.
* Tony Perkins responded by stating Republicans "exceed the expectations of the pundits" who "don’t understand the power of prayer."
* Johnson recounted speaking to reporters that electoral success was a "God thing," citing intercessory prayers for Republican-sponsored legislation.
* A Congressional Freethought Caucus (CFC) report from January 2024 highlighted Johnson's Christian nationalist views.
* The CFC noted Johnson spent decades working to deny, reject, and undermine the constitutional separation of church and state, including trafficking in fake histories about the nation’s founding.
* The CFC cited Johnson’s support for using public education and resources to promote evangelical Christianity.
* The CFC cited his promotion of anti-immigrant and anti-LGBTQ policies based on religious views.
* The CFC cited Johnson’s writing the forward to a right-wing book full of baseless conspiracy theories.
* The CFC cited Johnson’s past work with the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR), which promotes calls for Christians to "conquer" societal realms like business, media, and government.
* An Economist/YouGov poll showed 32 percent of Americans view Republicans in Congress favorably and 58 percent view them unfavorably.
* Fifty-one percent of respondents indicated the Republican Party was too extreme.
* Forty percent of respondents preferred the Democrat in their home district to win the midterms, while 34 percent wanted the Republican choice.
Executive Summary
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson claimed that Republicans will win the 2026 midterms due in large part to God’s intervention. He stated that Americans "trust House Republicans…to run this government," which he cited as the reason Republicans will maintain control of Congress beyond November. This statement was met with a response from Tony Perkins, the Family Research Council president, who suggested that Republicans exceeded expectations and referenced the power of prayer. Johnson further recounted speaking to reporters that the success in elections was a "God thing," citing intercessory prayers by groups praying for Republican-sponsored legislation through the Capitol.
Johnson's views reflect a Christian nationalist vision for governance. A Congressional Freethought Caucus (CFC) report from January 2024 highlighted Johnson's views, noting his work to undermine the separation of church and state, including trafficking in historical narratives. The CFC cited his support for using public resources for evangelical promotion, his promotion of anti-immigrant and anti-LGBTQ policies based on religious views, his writing a book with conspiracy theories, and his work with the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR).
Public polling indicates that only 32 percent of Americans view Republicans in Congress favorably, while 58 percent view them unfavorably. Fifty-one percent of respondents indicated they felt the Republican Party was too extreme. Furthermore, four out of ten respondents stated a preference for the Democratic choice to win their home district, with a six-point lead favoring Democrats just months before the 2026 election.
Full Take
The narrative links political outcomes to theological intervention, establishing a framework where political success is framed as divinely ordained rather than being based on policy or electoral strategy. This framing serves to recontextualize political action—whether it is the promotion of specific social policies (anti-immigrant/LGBTQ policies) or the pursuit of specific governance structures (Christian nationalism)—as a fulfillment of a higher plan. The reference to "intercessory prayers" and divine intervention shifts accountability away from human political calculus toward metaphysical certainty, potentially insulating political strategy from empirical critique.
The connection between Johnson's rhetoric and his documented activities within the CFC reveals an integration of religious ideology with political objectives. The history cited by the CFC—undermining the separation of church and state and promoting dominion over societal sectors via NAR—suggests a cohesive system where theological justification underpins political action, rather than being a separate sphere from it. This suggests that for these actors, political success is not just about winning elections but achieving a vision of divinely sanctioned societal reorganization.
The underlying pattern involves using appeals to faith and historical narratives (conspiracies) to legitimize positions that contradict established constitutional principles, which are then framed as necessary steps toward a predetermined goal. The erosion of public trust in institutions, coupled with the increasing reliance on digital information sources, creates an environment where complex political realities can be simplified into spiritual mandates. The anxiety expressed by entities like Truthout regarding the AI onslaught highlights a tension between verifiable reality and narratives designed to shape perception, suggesting that resistance requires grappling not just with facts, but with the philosophical frameworks used to construct those facts.
Bridge Questions: How does the reliance on divine intervention affect the capacity for constructive political compromise? What are the long-term consequences when political success is framed as predestined rather than contingent? How can independent analysis effectively disentangle theological motivation from policy outcomes in contemporary politics?
Sentinel — Human
The text appears to be human-written analysis designed to connect specific political rhetoric with broader structural concerns about media and AI, exhibiting sophisticated narrative control.