The Nations TailDex Index and the Cboe Skew Index, two separate gauges that measure how much traders are paying for crash protection, have retreated to near where they stood before the February 28 strikes on Iran. The S&P 500 is still down 2% from pre-war levels.
"TDEX is signaling that investors are now less worried about a "tail event," or a really steep drop in equity prices, than at any point since the war started," said Scott Nations, president of Nations Indexes, an independent developer of volatility and option strategy index products.
"Given the muted response from the S&P 500, this outlook makes sense, but it's an important metric to watch," he said.
On Monday, the TailDex index was at 18.84, just below its closing level of 19.01 on February 27. The Cboe SKEW index finished at 141.49 on Monday, down from 146.67 prior to the air strikes.
Both indexes soared to multi-month highs as soaring oil prices unleashed fear of a sizeable pullback in markets.
The cost of deep out-of-the-money S&P 500 puts - contracts that would offer protection against a 20% drop in the market over the next three months - stands just slightly higher than it was immediately prior to the strikes, according to Susquehanna Financial Group strategist Christopher Jacobson.
"After hitting multi-year highs at times last week, S&P skew levels have declined incrementally as some of that downside tail bid has faded alongside," Jacobson said.
While fear of a market crash has faded, market anxiety levels are still higher than they were in early February. Nor are investors rushing to bet on a sharp rebound in stocks past old highs.
"We haven't really seen that skew shift back towards the upside tail," Jacobson said.
(What's moving Sensex and Nifty Track latest market news, stock tips, Budget 2025, Share Market on Budget 2025 and expert advice, on ETMarkets. Also, ETMarkets.com is now on Telegram. For fastest news alerts on financial markets, investment strategies and stocks alerts, subscribe to our Telegram feeds .)
Subscribe to ET Prime and read the Economic Times ePaper Online.and Sensex Today.
Top Trending Stocks: SBI Share Price, Axis Bank Share Price, HDFC Bank Share Price, Infosys Share Price, Wipro Share Price, NTPC Share Price
(What's moving Sensex and Nifty Track latest market news, stock tips, Budget 2025, Share Market on Budget 2025 and expert advice, on ETMarkets. Also, ETMarkets.com is now on Telegram. For fastest news alerts on financial markets, investment strategies and stocks alerts, subscribe to our Telegram feeds .)
Subscribe to ET Prime and read the Economic Times ePaper Online.and Sensex Today.
Top Trending Stocks: SBI Share Price, Axis Bank Share Price, HDFC Bank Share Price, Infosys Share Price, Wipro Share Price, NTPC Share Price
Facts Only
* The TailDex Index was at 18.84 on Monday.
* The TailDex Index’s closing level on February 27 was 19.01.
* The Cboe SKEW Index finished at 141.49 on Monday.
* The Cboe SKEW Index’s prior closing level was 146.67.
* The S&P 500 is down 2% from pre-war levels.
* The cost of deep out-of-the-money S&P 500 puts is slightly higher than prior to the strikes.
* The strikes occurred on February 28.
* Scott Nations is the president of Nations Indexes.
* Susquehanna Financial Group strategist Christopher Jacobson provided commentary.
Executive Summary
Full Take
Let’s dissect this as a Watchline Operator. The data presents a cautiously optimistic read, but with a critical caveat: the muted response isn’t necessarily a sign of confidence, but a signal of exhaustion. We’re seeing a classic Motte-and-Bailey (ARC-0043) tactic – Nations highlights the reduced investor worry, which is undeniably true based on the index movements. However, this is framed to downplay the ongoing, persistent anxiety. The phrase "less worried" is deliberately vague, obscuring the fact that the S&P 500's performance itself hasn't dramatically improved. Jacobson's observations echo this – a decline in “skew levels” doesn’t equate to a return to bullish sentiment; it’s a simple reduction in downside protection demand. The lingering elevated put option costs suggest a shadow of fear remains.
The narrative subtly shifts blame – implying that investors *should* be more optimistic, rather than acknowledging the legitimate reasons for continued nervousness: geopolitical instability, elevated oil prices, and the overall uncertainty surrounding the conflict’s trajectory. It's a deliberate attempt to frame the situation in a more favorable light. This aligns with a broader pattern – the strategic use of relative decline to obscure absolute risk. The repeated invocation of "muted response" is a prime example of emotional exploitation (ARC-0012) designed to create a feeling of normalcy where none exists.
The underlying paradigm here is one of managed expectations – a carefully calibrated dose of reassurance designed to prevent panic while simultaneously obscuring the severity of the underlying risks. It’s a classic example of “everyone does it” (ARC-0027) – the implicit suggestion that if everyone else is calm, you should be too, regardless of the facts. Furthermore, the focus on the TailDex and SKEW indices risks diverting attention from the fundamental economic pressures influencing the S&P 500. The question is not whether investors are *less* worried, but whether they are *sufficiently* worried – a distinction that is deliberately obscured.
Sentinel — Likely Human
The article presents a factual overview of the retreat in volatility indices following market events, relying on quotes from industry analysts. While the information is accurate, the writing style exhibits some characteristics suggestive of machine-generated content, particularly through repetitive phrasing and reliance on promotional material.