Brazilian inmates find relief and reduce sentences through reading
RIO DE JANEIRO (AP) — When 33-year-old Brazilian woman Emily de Souza heard about a program allowing her to shave off four days from her prison sentence by reading a book, she seized the opportunity to reconnect with a cherished habit.
Like tens of thousands of detainees across the country — including former President Jair Bolsonaro — she signed up for a sentence reduction program that encourages inmates to immerse themselves in literary works in exchange for reducing their sentences by up to 48 days per year.
The possibility of reuniting earlier with her 9-year-old autistic son, who her mother and aunt are looking after, only ramped up her motivation to participate in the project.
“One day is an eternity because it feels like it’s never going to end,” said de Souza, who is incarcerated at the Djanira Dolores de Oliveira Women’s Prison in Rio de Janeiro, which houses approximately 820 female detainees.
Reading is “a kind of escape, to get out of this environment for a bit, to think about other things: other stories, other people, not just me,” she said.
Like most of her fellow inmates, de Souza was sentenced for drug-trafficking. She said she received five-year prison term for selling a cannabis-infused Brazilian chocolate treat known as “brigadeiro” in Portuguese. She arrived last November, but hopes to progress to Brazil’s semiopen prison regime in August, which would allow her to leave prison during the day to work.
Brazil, which has one of the highest per-capita incarceration rates in Latin America, stands out for having one of the most formalized and nationwide systems for sentence remission via reading in the world. The rapidly growing program, which was first formally regulated in 2012 and then standardized across Brazil in 2021, received renewed attention earlier this year after the Supreme Court authorized Bolsonaro — who is serving a 27-year sentence for attempting a coup — to take part.
‘It helps us a lot’
Andréia Oliveira, coordinator of female prisons and LGBTIQ+ inclusion in Rio state’s prisons, said that access to reading programs and schools helps the individual once they have left prison — but also society. “When we encourage education, ludic activities, knowledge, we return to society someone who can reconnect, respect rules,” she said.
Since 2022, literature professor Paulo Roberto Tonani has been conducting workshops in prisons so detainees in Rio can benefit from the measure.
Participants choose or are given a book in the initial kick off activity. They then discuss their book in the next encounter and finally, in a third meeting, they produce a review or a drawing that demonstrates comprehension.
Detainees have read “Captain of the Sands” by renowned Brazilian author Jorge Amado, “Crime and Punishment” by Fyodor Dostoevsky and “ The Color Purple ” by Alice Walker.
A much-loved favorite of participants is the illustrated book “Father Francisco,” by Marina Miyazaki Araujo, which tells the story of an incarcerated father from the child’s perspective, said Tonani. Many detainees in Brazilian prisons are from a poor background and did not complete basic education.
Some participants in the late March workshop at the Djanira Dolores de Oliveira prison were reading “Unsubmissive Tears of Women” by Brazilian writer Conceição Evaristo — including Celina Maria de Conceição, a 50-year-old woman originally from the northern state of Pernambuco.
De Conceição, who took part in the workshops last year and signed up again, said she developed the taste for reading thanks to the project.
“It helps us a lot because we’re locked up and it gets very stressful, very noisy,” she said. “We get to go to somewhere else, interact with other people and talk about good things, like the book we’re studying.”
Unequal access
But she said she had to put down Evaristo’s book, which explores the impact of violence on Black women’s lives, after it upset her.
“It wasn’t good for me, because it stirs up our emotions, and we’re in a place where the environment is already truly heavy,” she said.
Brazilian prisons are renowned for overcrowding and harsh conditions. In 2023, the Supreme Court recognized mass human rights violations in the prison system and ordered the federal government to develop a plan to resolve the situation. Called “Just Punishment,” it was launched in 2025 and among other goals seeks to expand study and work opportunities.
While progress has been made, access to earning time off by reading remains unequal across Brazil, said Rodrigo Dias, head of education, culture and sport in the country’s National Secretariat of Penal Policies.
In the northeastern state of Alagoas, some prisoners were handed a Kindle with 300 literary works on them, whereas other, more conservative states have heavy bureaucracy which hinders access, Dias said.
A 2023 government report found that some 30% of Brazilian prison units do not have libraries or adequate reading spaces. But Dias pointed to the secretariat’s data, which shows that the number of remission requests via reading has increased sevenfold since 2021.
Like de Conceição, once people began participating, they often want to continue. “The book gives them the possibility to dream, and often to ‘talk’ with other people — not those who are imprisoned or working in the facility, but with the characters in the stories,” Dias said.
‘More than a mistake’
While Elionaldo Fernandes Julião, co-author of the book “Sentence Remission Through Reading in Brazil: The Right to Education in Contest” and a professor at the Fluminense Federal University, underscores the importance of accessing books in prisons, he argues that oftentimes Brazil’s sentence reduction programs through reading are used as a substitute for developing access to education, which is much more costly.
Julião also said that access to the policy and books often depends on local projects. “Unfortunately, these are very easy to eliminate or shut down as quickly as possible,” he said.
During the recent workshop, de Souza read out loud a poem written by formerly imprisoned Argentine writer Liliana Cabrera. One of the lines affirms the narrator is “Also something more / than the letters in black / of a court case.”
De Souza shared that the words resonated deeply.
“Someone knew how to explain with beautiful terms (…) that I’m a lot more than a court case, a lot more than the mistake I made, that I’m a human with my story,” she said.
___
Follow AP’s coverage of Latin America and the Caribbean at https://apnews.com/hub/latin-america
Facts Only
Brazilian inmates can reduce their sentences by up to 48 days per year through a reading program.
The program was formally regulated in 2012 and standardized nationwide in 2021.
Former President Jair Bolsonaro, serving a 27-year sentence for attempting a coup, was authorized to participate in 2024.
Emily de Souza, a 33-year-old inmate at Djanira Dolores de Oliveira Women’s Prison in Rio de Janeiro, is participating to reduce her five-year sentence for drug trafficking.
The prison houses approximately 820 female detainees.
Participants read books, discuss them in workshops, and produce reviews or drawings to demonstrate comprehension.
Books include "Captain of the Sands" by Jorge Amado, "Crime and Punishment" by Fyodor Dostoevsky, and "The Color Purple" by Alice Walker.
A favored book among inmates is "Father Francisco" by Marina Miyazaki Araujo, which tells the story of an incarcerated father from a child’s perspective.
Literature professor Paulo Roberto Tonani has conducted workshops in Rio prisons since 2022.
Some inmates, like Celina Maria de Conceição, find reading therapeutic but may struggle with emotionally challenging content.
Brazil has one of the highest per-capita incarceration rates in Latin America.
A 2023 Supreme Court ruling recognized mass human rights violations in Brazilian prisons and ordered a federal plan to address overcrowding and expand education and work opportunities.
About 30% of Brazilian prison units lack libraries or adequate reading spaces.
The number of sentence remission requests via reading has increased sevenfold since 2021.
Access to the program varies by state, with some regions facing bureaucratic barriers.
Executive Summary
Full Take
The strongest version of this narrative highlights a progressive policy that merges criminal justice reform with education, offering inmates a tangible incentive to engage with literature while addressing systemic issues in Brazil’s overcrowded prisons. The program’s structured approach—workshops, discussions, and comprehension reviews—demonstrates a commitment to meaningful engagement rather than mere tokenism. The inclusion of diverse literary works, from Brazilian classics to global literature, suggests an effort to broaden perspectives and foster empathy. The emotional testimonies of participants like Emily de Souza and Celina Maria de Conceição underscore the program’s humanizing impact, providing a rare outlet for self-reflection and connection in a punitive environment.
However, the narrative also reveals tensions between symbolic progress and structural limitations. The program’s uneven implementation—with some states providing Kindles while others lack basic libraries—exposes deeper inequities in Brazil’s penal system. The concern raised by Elionaldo Fernandes Julião, that reading programs might substitute for more costly educational initiatives, points to a potential "ARC-0024 Ambiguity" pattern, where a well-intentioned policy risks becoming a band-aid for systemic neglect. The emotional exploitation of inmates’ vulnerabilities, while not overt, lurks in the background: the program’s appeal to familial longing (e.g., de Souza’s desire to reunite with her son) could be seen as leveraging personal pain for institutional efficiency.
Rooted in Brazil’s history of punitive justice and social inequality, this initiative reflects a global trend toward "rehabilitative" measures that often struggle to scale beyond pilot programs. The paradox is clear: while reading offers inmates a temporary escape, the prison system remains a site of dehumanization. The second-order consequences are mixed—reduced recidivism and personal growth for participants, but also the risk of normalizing inadequate conditions under the guise of reform.
Bridge questions: How might this program interact with Brazil’s broader carceral reforms, or does it risk becoming a performative distraction? What would it take to ensure equitable access across all prisons, and who bears responsibility for that equity? If education is the goal, why not invest in comprehensive literacy programs rather than tying them to sentence reduction?
Counterstrike scan: A bad actor pushing this narrative might frame it as a "humane" solution to deflect criticism of prison conditions, using emotional testimonies to sanitize systemic failures. The actual content does not fully align with this pattern, as it acknowledges the program’s limitations and broader context. However, the lack of critical voices from inmates who might reject the program’s premises (e.g., those who see it as coercive) leaves a gap in perspective.
Patterns detected: ARC-0024 Ambiguity (potential substitution of reading for broader education), ARC-0043 Motte-and-Bailey (emphasizing rehabilitation while prisons remain overcrowded).