Law & Politics
Art World’s Top Players Turn Up in New York’s Pied-à-Terre Tax Database
As part of its bid to administer a new pied-à-terre tax, the city has released property rolls revealing the trophy homes of mega-dealers and collectors.
The pied-à-terre tax database released by the New York City Department of Finance (DOF) last week includes—perhaps not surprisingly—many of the art world’s leading figures.
Some, such as mega-dealer David Zwirner, Pace Gallery’s Arne and Marc Glimcher, artist Julian Schnabel, art advisor Allan Schwartzman, and collector Mitchell Rales, are listed by name.
Others, including billionaires Steve Cohen, Leon Black, and Len Blavatnik, can be linked to limited liability companies. Mega-dealer Larry Gagosian’s mansion on East 75th Street is owned by Sugar Shack LLC and has a city-assigned value of $63.3 million, according to the DOF.
Earlier this year, New York Governor Kathy Hochul put forward the pied-à-terre tax initiative to back Mayor Zohran Mamdani‘s push to close the city’s budget gap by placing a surcharge on wealthy owners whose New York properties aren’t their primary residences.
To administer the pied-à-terre surcharge, the DOF published two massive property rolls on July 24, containing approximately 960,000 records, accompanied by owners’ names, addresses, and city-assigned values.
Although the DOF stressed that inclusion does not mean a property will ultimately be taxed, the data exposed the identities—or shell companies—behind scores of trophy homes, prompting privacy concerns and a scramble among owners to establish that their properties are primary residences. The data doesn’t specify if the properties are owned by residents or non-residents.
The immediate reaction to the public files ranged from confusion to frustration.
“This is news to me,” Schwartzman said. He declined to comment further on the inclusion of his Flatiron apartment, valued by the city at $1.42 million.
“Why would my name be on the list?” said Adam Lindemann, a collector, dealer, and Artnet News contributor. The city valued his Upper East Side home at $41 million. “I’ve paid New York City taxes my entire life.”
The surcharge made some sense for out-of-towners “who have an apartment here, but yet don’t pay any taxes in New York City,” he said. “We’re paying for their safety, their security, their water, their police, their fire.”
Either way, Lindemann disagreed with releasing the names.
“It’s a violation of privacy,” he said.
Zwirner’s East Village home is estimated at $10.6 million, according to the DOF. A spokesperson for David Zwirner gallery confirmed that “David is a NYC resident and that is his primary address.”
Representatives for Black and Cohen declined to comment. Others listed in the documents did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The mayor’s office did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment on the reactions to the DOF roll.
“On Tax Day earlier this year, I promised that we would tax the rich, and with our new pied-à-terre tax, that is exactly what we have done,” Mamdani said in a statement last week, when he announced that property owners had been notified via mail of the impending tax.
The notices apply to Phase 1 of the tax—one- to three-family homes valued at $5 million or more, and condos and co-ops valued at $1 million or more—with rates ranging from 0.8 to 6.5 percent depending on property type and value tier. Owners of family homes and condos have until August 21 to apply for an exemption, while cooperative-apartment owners have until August 24, according to DOF; formal bills go out in November.
The surcharge could have significant financial implications. Take Cohen, one of the world’s biggest collectors of modern, postwar, and contemporary art, whose net worth is around $22 billion, according to Bloomberg’s billionaire’s index. His primary residence is in Greenwich, Connecticut, but property records show he has acquired properties in the West Village in 2012 through Greenwich Heights Corporation. The completed property is valued by the city at $69.8 million, according to the DOF roll. If it does not qualify for an exemption, a 1.3 percent surcharge could generate approximately $907,478 annually for the city.
Rales, whose net worth is estimated at $3.9 billion by Forbes, is the founder of the private museum Glenstone in Potomac, Maryland. He also owns a 25th-floor unit on Central Park South valued at $2.67 million by the DOF. If it does not qualify for an exemption, it could face a 4 percent surcharge of approximately $106,724.
While the city publicized the filings with unusual aplomb this year, its archive of similar lists goes back at least until 2009, according to Benjamin M. Williams, a real estate attorney at Rosenberg & Estis who specializes in New York property-tax assessments. “It’s nothing new,” he said. “These names have been published for 20 years.”
He estimated that just 15,000 to 20,000 property owners received the notices from the DOF to prove their residence status.
“That list is over-inclusive,” he said.
Williams has advice for those who don’t want to surface in public rolls: use LLCs to buy real estate.
“If you are Pablo Picasso, you don’t buy it under Pablo Picasso,” he said. “You buy it as 1 Main Street LLC, and 1 Main Street LLC buys the property, and then you’re the owner of 1 Main Street LLC, but nobody knows that.”
Facts Only
* The New York City Department of Finance released two property rolls on July 24 containing approximately 960,000 records.
* The rolls included names, addresses, and city-assigned values for properties.
* Named individuals listed include David Zwirner, Arne and Marc Glimcher, Julian Schnabel, Allan Schwartzman, Mitchell Rales, Steve Cohen, Leon Black, and Len Blavatnik.
* Larry Gagosian’s mansion on East 75th Street has a city-assigned value of $63.3 million according to the DOF.
* The tax initiative was proposed by New York Governor Kathy Hochul.
* Phase 1 of the tax applies to one- to three-family homes valued at $5 million or more, and condos/co-ops valued at $1 million or more.
* Surcharges range from 0.8 to 6.5 percent based on property type and value tier.
* Steve Cohen's property in the West Village is valued by the city at $69.8 million according to the DOF roll.
* Mitchell Rales owns a unit on Central Park South valued at $2.67 million by the DOF.
* A real estate attorney estimated that 15,000 to 20,000 property owners received notices from the DOF.
Executive Summary
The New York City Department of Finance released property rolls containing approximately 960,000 records related to the proposed pied-à-terre tax. These rolls list names, addresses, and city-assigned values for properties, which included some art world figures such as David Zwirner and collectors like Mitchell Rales, as well as billionaires like Steve Cohen and Leon Black. The initiative was put forward by Governor Kathy Hochul to address the city’s budget gap by taxing wealthy owners of New York properties that are not their primary residences.
The release prompted immediate reactions ranging from confusion to frustration regarding privacy concerns, with some individuals, like Allan Schwartzman and Adam Lindemann, objecting to the public disclosure of their information. While the Department of Finance stated that inclusion in the data does not guarantee taxation, the data exposed the identities behind numerous properties. The proposed surcharge targets one- to three-family homes valued at $5 million or more, with rates ranging from 0.8 to 6.5 percent depending on property type and value tier.
Full Take
The narrative surrounding the release of property data for a potential tax highlights a tension between governmental fiscal necessity and individual privacy rights. The mechanism used—public disclosure of names and property values tied to speculative taxation—raises questions about the boundaries of public interest versus personal autonomy, especially when shell companies or LLCs are involved in ownership structures. The reaction from some subjects, who framed the release as a violation of privacy, contrasts sharply with the stated goal of closing budget gaps through wealth redistribution.
The system reveals a pattern where institutional efforts to manage public resources often rely on data aggregation that inadvertently exposes sensitive private information. Furthermore, the commentary from real estate experts suggests that the process itself is susceptible to manipulation regarding ownership status; the suggestion to use LLCs to obscure ownership points toward an underlying resistance to transparent categorization of wealth. The core implication is a struggle over how society defines and regulates assets: whether wealth held in public spaces should be subject to taxation, and who controls the definition of residency when property deeds and financial holdings are deliberately obscured through legal structures.
Bridge Questions: If the goal is equitable taxation, what specific metrics could substitute for publicly listed property ownership data to achieve the same fiscal outcome without infringing on privacy? How does the trend observed in historical property roll releases influence public trust in future governmental initiatives concerning wealth assessment? What framework should govern the balance between governmental necessity and individual informational sovereignty regarding real estate holdings?
Sentinel — Human
This text reads like standard journalistic reporting that synthesizes official data with expert commentary and public reactions effectively.
