Skip to content
Chimera readability score 65 out of 100, Academic reading level.

Yannick Griep, a former rising star in management research at Radboud University in the Netherlands, is set to lose an undisclosed number of articles from a journal he once edited, Retraction Watch has learned.
In an email we obtained, Sage’s Isabella Austin told editorial board members of Group & Organization Management that following “a thorough investigation into the concerns about peer-review on this journal,” the publisher found the “objectivity of the peer-review process administered by the former Editor in Chief on a subset of articles where they are co-author was compromised.” Those articles, wrote Austin, would be retracted.
“[N]o determination has been made regarding the scientific content of the articles,” she added.
Griep was fired in late 2024 by Radboud after the university found he had submitted a fake expense report. Attention soon turned to his research, and Radboud determined earlier this year that in one study – now retracted – “roughly half of the data points appeared multiple times and likely originated from a master’s thesis about an entirely different study,” Voxweb.nl reported.
Griep had committed a “very serious violation of scientific integrity,” said Radboud, which has also opened another investigation into more of his work. He is no longer editor in chief of Group & Organization Management, which lists 25 papers with him as co-author.
Sage would not provide Retraction Watch with a list of the articles to be retracted, saying the matter was still under investigation.
Like Retraction Watch? You can make a tax-deductible contribution to support our work, follow us on X or Bluesky, like us on Facebook, follow us on LinkedIn, add us to your RSS reader, or subscribe to our daily digest. If you find a retraction that’s not in our database, you can let us know here. For comments or feedback, email us at [email protected].

Sentinel — Human

Confidence

The text appears to be human-written journalistic reporting, evidenced by specific sourcing and narrative flow around complex institutional conflicts.

Signals Detected
low severity: Moderate sentence length variance; natural flow interrupted by direct quotes and shifts in focus.
low severity: Coherent narrative structure linking Griep's employment issues to research integrity concerns, though the tone is primarily reporting facts rather than emotional synthesis.
low severity: Attribution is specific (citing an email source and specific reports like Voxweb.nl), suggesting grounded sourcing rather than pure template repetition.
low severity: Claims are directly tied to reported investigations and specific entities (Radboud, Sage, Retraction Watch).
Human Indicators
Incorporation of named sources (Isabella Austin, Radboud University) and direct citations from an obtained email lends a distinct journalistic texture.
The structure moves logically from the central conflict to supporting details and finally to unresolved status, typical of investigative reporting.