In Africa, climate change is now daily life. It is in the floods and the droughts, food prices and water shortages, in land conflicts, mining, energy, migration, health and livelihoods. But in its newsrooms, climate change is not a daily story.
“There is a real tension in African journalism. Climate change… is still often treated like a niche beat or a disaster story, rather than something that cuts across politics, business, health, food, inequality and daily life,” said Sheree Bega, environment reporter and acting news editor at South Africa’s Mail & Guardian.
Dialogue Earth spoke to editors and media leaders in South Africa, Rwanda, Kenya and Ghana about the state of environmental journalism on the continent. Most said they grapple with one central question: “Are we covering climate because it is dramatic in the moment, or because we understand it as an ongoing public-interest issue that needs sustained reporting?” as Bega put it.
In most newsrooms, editors described climate coverage being triggered by visible events – floods, deaths, storms, droughts or official warnings. “Most times, journalists are in a situation where they are reacting to these, without knowing what happened and the science behind it,” said Mary Mwendwa, editor at Nairobi-based platform Talk Africa. “Climate stories are not very well researched.”
The risk, Mwenda said, is that the media becomes entirely dependent on official prompts. Weather alerts from the government are necessary but other questions fall by the wayside, such as why some places flood repeatedly, why some communities are more exposed. “We need to go beyond these alerts and set the agenda as media,” she said.
Her ideas include a special desk on climate reporting, training for journalists, and a “deliberate effort” by media houses. “Many media houses have political affiliations, and with this kind of setting, politics always takes centre stage. You find climate stories as features within news items, and not as the main or top story.”
But there are some that can spot shoots of change. Joe Ageyo, editor-in-chief of the Nation in Kenya, believes climate reporting has begun to move away from purely episodic coverage. “The doom and gloom that was the hallmark of climate reporting, has given way to something more contextual,” he said. “Climate has become a cross-cutting editorial issue.”
Even if it exists however, that shift is uneven. While some contextual climate journalism is emerging, editors said this largely rests on individual journalists, rather than institutions.
The broken newsroom model
The problem is both structural and editorial.
Climate reporting must be understood within the wider crisis in journalism, Sheree Bega said. Generally speaking it takes a lot of time and money, “exactly the things many newsrooms are struggling to afford”, she said.
External funding has helped build climate journalism across the continent, but when stories depend too heavily on donor support, coverage can become seasonal, theme-driven and vulnerable to external priorities. “Climate stories don’t normally sell, even though they are often impactful,” said Emmanuel Dogbevi, managing editor of Ghana Business News.
Niyonagize Fulgence, a Rwandan journalist and the media coordinator at Fojo Media Institute, said: “Climate stories become more investigative and data-driven mainly when there is external funding or grants available. Otherwise, they are generally reported in the same way as other routine news, often remaining episodic and reactive.”
Bega urged newsrooms to “treat climate reporting as core public-interest journalism, not something that only happens when there is dedicated funding attached to it.”
Sbu Ngalwa, secretary general of the African Editors Forum, said that while grants are not the ultimate solution, in the absence of other sustainable methods of financing journalism, they “help a great deal.” But, he said, donor support must be part of a wider set of interventions that rebuild African newsroom capacity. “We know the business model. It can be fixed,” he said.
Climate reporting is accountability reporting
Newsroom leaders in Africa said another pressure is that climate reporting often runs directly into political power. “Once you start reporting seriously on energy, mining, pollution, land use, infrastructure, adaptation or environmental regulation, you are no longer covering “the environment”; you are covering politics and business in a very direct way,” said Bega.
You will find very few independent critical stories on climate, and more stories quoting political leadership and business leadersEmmanuel Dogbevi, managing editor of Ghana Business News
Dogbevi said that in Ghana too, much climate coverage is still driven by official voices instead of independent reporting. “Most of the stories you will find around, particularly from where I operate, are stories derived from speeches of politicians, workshops by appointees and elected officials, technocrats, and some civil society organisations that end up working in the climate space,” he said. “And so, you will find very few independent critical stories on climate, and more stories quoting political leadership and business leaders,” he said.
Bega warned that climate narratives are written in language that is often benign: development, investment, resilience, sustainability and energy security. Some of this reflects policy work. But some conceals political or corporate interests. “There is a lot of branding around sustainability now, but some of it is clearly greenwashing,” Bega said.
Fulgence of the Fojo Media Institute said: “Other issues, such as environmental degradation linked to mining activities owned by powerful actors, can be more sensitive. In such cases, journalists may hesitate to report due to potential risks, including threats to their safety.”
The development question
Multiple editors told Dialogue Earth that African climate coverage relies too heavily on UN climate summits and other global policy, instead of emanating from the continent’s own development pressures. “Climate reporting in Africa has to be rooted in the realities of the people. It can’t just mirror global narratives or focus only on catastrophe,” Bega said.
Fiona Macleod, based in Johannesburg, and founder of non-profit newsroom the Oxpeckers Investigative Environmental Journalism, says she can spot some change around her: “Environmental and climate-related stories were regarded as sort of nice to have … I think many – most – media are now regarding them as ‘we must have.’”
For Oxpeckers, the goal is to examine systems and processes. “We’re not just doing the ‘this is happening today’ … We’re doing a lot more than that … combining traditional investigative reporting techniques with data analysis and geo-mapping,” Macleod said.
What audiences think, and the lack of training
Editors said climate stories often struggle to attract audiences. This tallies with a 2021 Rwandan media consumption survey which found audience interest in climate change stories to be relatively low. Disaster-related stories and weather forecasts ranked higher. “This suggests that audiences are interested in weather information for daily planning, but less engaged with broader climate change issues,” Fulgence said.
Bega says audiences engage when climate reporting is connected to lived reality. “When climate reporting is framed only through policy language or international summits, it can feel distant – but when it’s connected to daily life … people understand very quickly that this is not a future issue, it’s already here,” Bega said.
For Dogbevi, in Ghana, there is also a clear skills gap in African newsrooms: “I don’t think there is enough training on climate reporting, and we need it to ensure competence in climate storytelling.” Ngalwa added that a primary reason has been that newsrooms have “just been trying to stay afloat.” “There’s been very little investment in improving the level of journalism, and the tools of storytelling,” Ngalwa said.
This is in an environment where artificial intelligence and digital tools are beginning to change newsroom workflows. Bega said that while AI can assist with information, the core work of journalism still depends on people, context and power. “Though AI can be useful for handling large volumes of information, it cannot replace talking to people, understanding communities and interrogating power,” she said.
The editors interviewed by Dialogue Earth described a field under pressure. Climate journalism must explain one of the defining public-interest stories of the century while newsrooms are financially strained, politically exposed, understaffed and still learning how to connect climate to daily life. They argued that climate journalism has to become part of the permanent machinery of public-interest reporting.
As the climate story unfolds apace in many African communities, journalism must catch up.
Facts Only
* Climate change impacts in Africa include floods, droughts, food prices, water shortages, land conflicts, mining, energy, migration, health, and livelihoods.
* Journalists report a tension regarding climate change coverage, which is often treated as a niche beat or disaster story rather than an issue cutting across politics, business, health, food, inequality, and daily life.
* Most journalists describe climate coverage being triggered by visible events such as floods, deaths, storms, droughts, or official warnings.
* Some journalists state that climate stories are not very well researched because they are often reactive to events without understanding the underlying science.
* There is a risk that media becomes dependent on official prompts like government weather alerts, neglecting deeper questions about systemic causes.
* Some editors suggest solutions include establishing special desks, providing training, and making deliberate efforts by media houses.
* Some journalists report a shift toward more contextual coverage, moving away from purely episodic reporting.
* Climate reporting often runs into political power, with many stories being derived from official voices such as speeches or statements from politicians and officials.
* Narratives around sustainability are sometimes used to conceal political or corporate interests, including greenwashing.
* Audience interest in climate change stories is reported to be relatively low compared to disaster-related stories and weather forecasts.
* There is a recognized skills gap in African newsrooms regarding climate reporting, necessitating training.
Executive Summary
Climate change is an omnipresent reality in Africa, manifesting in issues such as floods, droughts, food price volatility, water shortages, land conflicts, mining, energy, migration, health, and livelihoods. However, climate change is not typically a central story in African newsrooms. Journalists report a tension regarding coverage, questioning whether stories are driven by immediate dramatic events or by understanding climate change as an ongoing public-interest issue requiring sustained reporting.
Most journalists find that coverage is often triggered by visible events like floods or official warnings, leading to reactive reporting that often lacks scientific depth. This dependence on official prompts risks sidelining deeper inquiries into root causes, such as why certain areas are repeatedly affected by flooding. While some editors note a shift towards more contextual reporting, this change is uneven and often relies on individual journalists rather than institutional structures.
The challenges in climate journalism are structural; the field requires significant time and funding, which many newsrooms struggle to afford. External funding can lead to coverage that becomes seasonal or theme-driven, while investigative depth often requires external grants. Furthermore, climate reporting frequently intersects directly with political power and business interests, leading to a tendency to report on official narratives framed by concepts like development and sustainability, sometimes obscuring underlying corporate or political motivations, including instances of greenwashing.
Full Take
The pattern observed is a systemic tension between the urgent reality of climate change and the structural limitations facing journalism on the continent: financial strain, political exposure, and the need to shift from reactive event coverage to deep investigative inquiry. The system currently rewards episodic, reaction-based reporting driven by external prompts (official alerts) over sustained, context-driven analysis, which inherently benefits established power structures framed in development and sustainability language.
The move toward deeper, contextual journalism is stalled by two key systemic barriers: the financial model for climate reporting and the political sensitivity of covering related topics. When climate stories are pursued without sufficient independent funding, they risk being consumed as specialized features rather than core public-interest reporting. Furthermore, when climate themes intersect with resource extraction (mining, energy), the incentive structure pushes reporting toward official narratives, thereby allowing powerful actors to control the frame. This creates a dangerous feedback loop where reporting on environmental degradation risks implicating journalists, while framing issues in terms of 'development' can mask underlying corporate and political accountability gaps.
The central implication for agency is that achieving robust climate journalism requires more than just technical skill; it demands structural reorganization—a fundamental recalibration of how newsrooms are funded, structured, and empowered to pursue narratives that expose systemic imbalances rather than merely reflect external events. The shift requires moving from externally validated, often superficial narratives to internally driven investigative work focused on lived realities and power dynamics within the region.
BRIDGE QUESTIONS: If sustainable financing for climate journalism is decoupled from donor priorities, what alternative economic models can institutions adopt to ensure accountability reporting remains central? How can training initiatives be structurally integrated into existing newsroom operations rather than treated as supplementary modules to address the skills gap effectively? What mechanisms can be developed to protect journalists pursuing investigative stories linked to resource conflicts while maintaining necessary critical distance from state-aligned narratives?
Sentinel — Human
This text appears to be a well-sourced synthesis of expert commentary regarding the challenges of climate journalism in Africa, displaying the depth and structure of human investigative dialogue rather than pure synthetic generation.
