- Published
Google has been fined €890m (£759m) by the EU for allegedly abusing its power by favouring its own apps and services over those from rivals.
It is the first major action against the tech giant under the EU's Digital Markets Act (DMA), a landmark law aimed at curbing the power of the world's biggest tech companies.
The Commission argued Google's practices limited consumer choice and gave its own services an unfair advantage over rivals.
But the firm criticised the decision, arguing the EU's requirements could damage services used by millions of European customers.
"To comply, we are having to strip away real-time Search features Europeans love - like instant pricing and direct availability for hotels, flights and restaurants - and dismantle safety protections on Google Play," said Google's president of global affairs Kent Walker.
"This isn't fair competition."
EU officials rejected that argument, saying the measures are necessary to prevent dominant platforms from disadvantaging rivals.
The total fine handed down to Google is comprised of two separate breaches of the DMA.
The European Commission imposed a €460m penalty after finding Google favoured its own services for helping people book flights and hotels over competitors in search results.
And it gave the firm a further €430m fine due to its Play Store rules, with regulators saying it didn't allow people to be shown cheaper offers available outside Google's own marketplace.
Google has a long history of disputes with European regulators, having previously received billions of euros in fines over separate competition cases.
EU competition chief Teresa Ribera said companies should succeed because of the quality of their products - rather than their market position.
"The best products should succeed because they're better, not because they're owned by the company running the search engine," she said.
EU tech boss Henna Virkkunen echoed those thoughts.
"After this decision, we want to make sure that there is more competition and also other companies are able to innovate," she said.
Zach Meyers, director of research at the Centre on Regulation in Europe, noted a delay in the competition authority finalising its decision against Google, telling the BBC it was likely driven "by a desire not to upset EU-US relations".
As US president Donald Trump has frequently threatened or imposed new tariffs, however, the Commission came to see its efforts as futile and went ahead with the fine.
"It reflects a growing view among EU officials that the US president's unpredictability and unwillingness to comply with his own deals means that the EU has little to gain by treading softly - and potentially a lot to lose in terms of regulatory credibility," Meyers said.
Google now has 60 days to comply with the regulations - or challenge them by taking the Commission to court.
AliExpress fined record €550m by EU for allowing sale of illegal goods
- Published3 days ago
Google fined €2.95bn by EU for abusing advertising dominance
- Published5 September 2025
Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.
Facts Only
* Google was fined €890 million by the EU.
* The fine relates to allegedly favoring Google's own apps and services over rivals.
* This action is under the EU's Digital Markets Act (DMA).
* The €460 million penalty was for favoring Google's services for booking flights and hotels in search results over competitors.
* A further €430 million fine was imposed due to Play Store rules concerning access to cheaper offers outside the Google marketplace.
* Google stated compliance would require stripping real-time Search features (like instant pricing) and dismantling safety protections on Google Play.
* EU officials argued the measures were necessary to prevent dominant platforms from disadvantaging rivals.
* The EU competition chief stated that better products should succeed based on quality, not market position.
* Google was given 60 days to comply or challenge the decision in court.
Executive Summary
Full Take
The dynamic presented involves a clash between regulatory intervention aimed at structural fairness and the defense of operational autonomy by a dominant entity. The core tension lies in balancing the stated goal of creating robust competition against the functional reality of existing market structures and consumer access to convenience features. The argument that innovation and product quality should dictate success, rather than market positioning, introduces a philosophical layer into regulatory enforcement. Furthermore, the involvement of geopolitical factors, specifically the reaction against US actions, suggests that the rationale for strict regulation extends beyond purely economic concerns into broader regulatory credibility among global powers. The process itself—a fine followed by legal challenge and public debate on the prioritization of real-time consumer service versus platform control—reveals a systemic friction point in governing digital monopolies. This scenario highlights how abstract principles of competition are translated into concrete, tangible impacts on daily user experience and developer operations.
Bridge Questions: What metrics should regulators use to weigh the harm caused by favoring internal services against the friction introduced by imposing DMA compliance? How does the concept of "real-time" features translate across different legal jurisdictions, and how should international regulatory frameworks harmonize these definitions? What are the long-term effects on the pace of genuine technological innovation when operational compliance becomes a primary constraint?
Sentinel — Human
This text appears to be a synthesis of specific news reports regarding Google's EU fines under the DMA, blending official statements with contextual analysis, indicating human journalistic assembly.