Has anyone tried to sell you peptides yet? If not, they probably will soon. Once a niche interest among bodybuilders and biohackers, peptides are an increasingly popular class of substance hyped by both fringe influencers and the current US Secretary of Health and Human Services.
Earlier this year, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told the podcaster Joe Rogan that the government intended to loosen restrictions on peptide production. This week, it could finally happen: On July 23 and 24, the Food and Drug Administration will discuss whether to reclassify a group of peptides so that pharmacies can legally make custom mixes, a process known as compounding. The move would reverse a decision made in 2023 by the Biden Administration, which barred certain peptides from being compounded.
Although career scientists at the agency have recommended against it, many industry insiders tell WIRED they believe the FDA will approve reclassification anyway, since the committee put together to do the assessment includes peptide boosters. Some players in the telehealth world are already operating under the assumption that the floodgates will soon open. “We’re getting everything ready to go,” says Myra Ahmad, the chief executive of the telehealth platform Mochi Health, which originally focused on GLP-1 medications. “We have pharmacies that have done all their safety testing stuff, they’re putting pricing together.”
Some of the largest telehealth companies have looked forward to this moment for over a year. Virtual healthcare juggernaut Hims & Hers Health purchased a peptide manufacturing facility back in February 2025 and is currently developing clinical protocols for peptides, according to its chief medical officer Anant Vinjamoori, who is slated to testify at the FDA heading. Joshua Fritzler, the president of the compounding pharmacy Olympia Pharmaceuticals, says the company has been preparing in advance of the anticipated changes, “spending a lot of money to create these formulas” to be ready if the FDA gives the green light.
“There’s an understanding in the industry that something big is happening,” he says.
The GLP-1 boom warmed people up to the idea of injecting medications at home, and proved to be a cash cow for pharmacies and virtual clinics. Now, though, many of these companies are eager to expand their horizons. Cole Thomas, the director of sales and operations at the pharmacy marketing and technology platform RxConnexion, says that some of the company’s compounding pharmacy clients are already testing peptides that are likely to be popular. One such variety, BPC-157, is touted as a healing compound and is one half of the combination known as the “Wolverine stack.” (BPC stands for “Body Protection Compound.”)
Cameron Bravo, a research scientist at the biotech firm Sapho Bio, says his company has been approached about testing a variety of peptides already, too. (Mochi Health is a client.) Sapho Bio runs tests to “validate” formulas that clients bring, ensuring the mixtures are uncontaminated and properly sealed. So far, it’s tested BPC-157, as well as more obscure offerings like MOTS-c, which is hyped as “exercise in a vial” by evangelists. Some of the pharmacies the company works with are testing multiple products already, at significant cost. “They're probably investing something like $100,000 into these before they're even fully out yet,” he says.
Even if this week’s meeting goes exactly how peptide boosters want it to go, with the committee approving all of the substances up for discussion, that won’t lead to an immediate green light for sellers. The next step involves a review period, during which the FDA will propose rules and the public will be able to comment. “It’s a long-winded process,” says Gerard Olson, who was recently the director of research at LegitScript, a company that provides certifications for telehealth providers and pharmacies.
Hims plans to wait and see. “We don't want to be necessarily first to market. We want to be best in market,” says chief medical officer Anant Vinjamoori, a longevity doctor slated to speak before the FDA committee on July 23.
But other compounders and clinics are already moving ahead with prescribing these medications as injectables.
Amanecia Health, a concierge service that sees patients in-person at its Texas and Virginia clinics in addition to operating a telehealth practice, has already started prescribing popular options like BPC-157. “There's been an uptick in interest because it's been all over Instagram and the media,” says Amanceia’s founder Ann Czarnik, who also works as an emergency medicine physician. Even though Czarnik readily acknowledges that these substances do not have the same kind of safety and efficacy data that traditional medications do, her practice has begun tentatively prescribing them to a small group of patients; she stresses that this “tiny percentage” of her patient base is aware that they are not FDA-approved medications. “I can’t advertise that I’m prescribing them yet,” she says.
Scott Brunner, the head of the Alliance for Pharmacy Compounding, has been warning member pharmacies to comply with the law, and not go rogue and roll out peptides early. “Many of them are being hammered by prescribers and patients to do this,” he says. To make the temptation even more intense, these compounders know that the people they turn away have easy access to a gray market supply.
Right now, all of the peptides up for discussion in the July FDA meeting, as well as many others, are remarkably easy to get your hands on. They’re available for purchase from online sellers that place disclaimers on their products, noting that they are “research grade only” and not for human consumption.
“We are not selling. It is not legal for us to do so,” says Olympia’s Fritzler. “This gray market, which is insane—obviously we are not participating in it.”
“Everyone and their mom wants to start a peptide company right now,” says Thomas Millman, who runs OnTop Labs, a Florida-based research-use peptide operation. OnTop Labs sells products like Melanotan II, known as the “Barbie peptide” and the “tan jab” for the way it stimulates melatonin production and changes skin pigmentation. It’s also slated for an FDA discussion on reclassification, but not until 2027. The Skin Cancer Foundation recently issued a warning about Melanotan II, citing case reports about increased melanoma risk.
Nevertheless, Millman promotes his products on social media, primarily TikTok. The glut of companies offering research-grade peptides has made it more difficult to stand out, he says. “There’s just so much more competition.”
Comments
Back to top
Facts Only
* Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told Joe Rogan the government intended to loosen restrictions on peptide production earlier this year.
* On July 23 and 24, the Food and Drug Administration will discuss reclassifying a group of peptides for pharmacy compounding.
* The Biden Administration barred certain peptides from being compounded in 2023.
* Career scientists at the FDA recommended against the proposed change for compounding.
* Industry insiders believe the FDA will approve the reclassification because the assessment committee includes peptide boosters.
* Myra Ahmad, CEO of Mochi Health, stated that pharmacies have completed safety testing and are setting pricing.
* Hims & Hers Health purchased a peptide manufacturing facility in February 2025 and is developing clinical protocols.
* Joshua Fritzler stated the company has been preparing to create formulas in advance of anticipated FDA changes.
* Amanecia Health has started prescribing BPC-157 to some patients.
* Scott Brunner, head of the Alliance for Pharmacy Compounding, warned pharmacies against rolling out peptides early.
* Research scientists test peptide formulas to validate them for contamination and sealing.
* Online sellers offer research-grade peptides with disclaimers.
Executive Summary
Full Take
The narrative centers on the tension between regulatory caution and rapid commercial/market adaptation in a space increasingly fueled by high demand. The process described—the FDA review of reclassification—highlights how bureaucratic procedures can lag behind market momentum, creating an environment where entities act based on anticipated outcomes rather than current legal certainty. The involvement of industry players who are actively preparing infrastructure, clinical protocols, and testing services suggests that the focus shifts from *if* a change will happen to *how fast* it can be exploited.
The pattern observed is one of preemptive mobilization driven by perceived regulatory lag and market opportunity. Entities like telehealth providers and pharmaceutical marketing platforms are positioning themselves ahead of potential legal changes, building infrastructure and clinical frameworks while waiting for formal approval. This creates an asymmetry where those with existing capital and operational capacity gain an advantage over those who must wait for established timelines. The existence of a readily accessible gray market coexists with official regulatory scrutiny, which allows commercial interest to bypass slow, deliberate governmental processes.
This dynamic raises questions about cognitive sovereignty: when innovation is driven by external hype and industry readiness rather than rigorous, universally accepted safety data—as noted by Amanceia Health’s cautious prescribing—how can individuals navigate complex decisions? The juxtaposition of scientifically cautious bodies within the FDA against an industry that is rapidly developing proprietary compounds and distribution channels illustrates a systemic friction between public safety mandates and market velocity. What assumptions about risk and legitimate research are being leveraged to accelerate commercialization in this sphere?
