Bitcoin is up 4.45% over the past 30 days. (CoinMarketCap)
However, Coutts warned that markets rarely follow historical patterns so neatly. “They just sort of do their own thing. And at the moment, all the trend indicators are obviously bearish,” Coutts said.
On the bright sides, Coutts said he is beginning to see early technical signs that selling pressure is easing.
“I'm starting to see a bullish divergence appear on the longer time frames on momentum. So that's just telling me that the acceleration, or should I say, the negative momentum is decelerating, but that doesn't mean that we're out of this bear market from a technical perspective at all,” Coutts said.
While many market participants blamed Bitcoin's fourth-quarter downturn on tightening global liquidity conditions, Coutts said that weakening onchain fundamentals also played a significant part.
“So onchain demand, which definitely drives price and is somewhat correlated to things like global liquidity and the business cycle, they started to deteriorate as well.”
Related: Bitcoin ETFs end 'most overwhelming' $2.7B sell-off amid new $85M net outflow
Coutts was cautious when asked whether he agreed with long range forecasts from Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and ARK Invest CEO Cathie Wood that Bitcoin could reach $1 million by 2030.
“The models that I was working with did have about a million by 2032, 2033. It’s just a function of like how much money printing is gonna be required between now and then,” he said.
“I'm more comfortable with a forecast in the next sort of two to three years that Bitcoin should get to sort of $200,000 to 250,000,” he said. Outside of that timeframe, he added, it is “very hard to say."
“I think it's gonna be interesting what AI brings to the equation, as you know, we see more wallets spun up for agents, and what are they gonna essentially store their value in? Are they gonna make the same decisions as what humans have?” he said.
On longer term risks to Bitcoin’s valuation, Coutts said the community will need to take more decisive action by 2027 to address the potential threat posed by quantum computing.
“If there isn't really firm movement on this, this will become an increasingly talked-about issue for the network because as much as everything is under risk from quantum, Bitcoin is a decentralized network. It's going to take five years for it to actually implement a major protocol upgrade.”
Coutts said Bitcoin developers who dismiss concerns over quantum computing’s potential threat to the network are on the “wrong side of this.”
Features: Bitcoin’s quantum dilemma — Bigger blocks or STARK proofs?
More on the subject
Facts Only
* Bitcoin increased by 4.45% over the past 30 days (CoinMarketCap).
* Coutts stated that market trends do not follow historical patterns neatly.
* Trend indicators are currently bearish according to Coutts.
* Coutts observed early technical signs suggesting selling pressure is easing.
* A bullish divergence is appearing on longer time frames in momentum.
* On-chain demand has deteriorated, correlating with global liquidity and the business cycle.
* Long-range models project Bitcoin reaching $1 million by 2032 or 2033.
* Coutts is more comfortable with a forecast of $200,000 to $250,000 in the next two to three years.
* The community needs decisive action by 2027 regarding quantum computing risks.
* Bitcoin developers dismissing quantum threats are considered to be on the wrong side.
Executive Summary
Full Take
The narrative presents a tension between short-term technical softening and long-term structural uncertainties. The discussion about market unpredictability suggests that relying solely on historical patterns introduces fragility into forecasting, forcing reliance on emergent signals like momentum divergences. This mirrors a recurring pattern in complex systems where micro-level noise (daily price action) must be contextualized against macro-level constraints (liquidity, business cycles). The acknowledgement that on-chain fundamentals are deteriorating alongside price action suggests that market movements are driven by both speculative flows and underlying utility concerns.
The debate over long-term valuation is framed not just around growth projections but around existential threats, specifically quantum computing risk. This introduces a second-order consideration: the timeline for protocol adoption versus the speed of technological evolution, suggesting that governance and foundational security become as critical as financial metrics. The tension between optimism regarding AI integration (agents) and sober assessment of physical risks (quantum) highlights a cognitive dissonance in the community managing decentralized infrastructure. A key implication is the necessity for stakeholders to move beyond purely quantitative forecasting to establish robust risk management protocols based on long-term, non-linear threats rather than relying solely on models dependent on current economic regimes.
Bridge questions: How should market participants weigh short-term momentum shifts against long-term existential risks like quantum computing? What metrics should be prioritized when forecasting value in a regime where historical patterns are explicitly dismissed? If technical indicators suggest easing selling pressure, what specific structural changes in on-chain demand would provide sufficient evidence to override the prevailing bearish sentiment?
Sentinel — Human
This text appears to be a direct report or synthesis of an interview with Coutts, characterized by conversational hedging and specific forward-looking analysis rather than purely objective reporting.