'No more selling Bombardier in the United States!' The president posted in a string of more than 60 posts
U.S. President Donald Trump launched a string of complaints and threats targeting Canada, levelling an attack against aircraft maker Bombardier and posting a photo of the North American continent covered in an American flag.
“No more selling Bombardier in the United States!” the president posted on his Truth Social page Monday just hours before the looming midnight trade deadline. “Their products aren’t good enough! Over 50 per cent of their revenue comes from the United States — they live off American buyers, American companies, American airports, and American service — all while Canada blocks our GREAT American Banks, and companies, throughout the U.S.A.”
The comments were part of a social media blitz in which Trump intensified his attacks on both Canada and Mexico, heaping new uncertainty onto the ongoing trade disputes between the U.S. and its neighbours. The president made more than 60 posts on Monday, taunting “Governor Carney,” threatening to change the name of the state of New Mexico to “New America,” and complaining about the “imbalance” between the value of the Canadian and U.S. dollars.
At 12:01 a.m. Tuesday, Canada’s raft of sweeping counter-tariffs, ranging from 15 per cent to 50 per cent on $28 billion worth of goods, are to come into effect. As of late Monday afternoon, Canadian officials said they were not scheduled to continue talks with U.S. negotiators.
As part of his threat to block sales of Bombardier jets in the U.S., Trump claimed the move was in response to Canada blocking U.S.-based Gulfstream Aerospace and other companies from operating in Canada.
“That era is OVER!” he said. “If they want our market, they must build here, and stop treating America like a “piggybank.” Buy American. Fly on American airliners. Enjoy American liquor and beverages. Sail on Lake America.”
Jennifer Kavanagh, senior fellow and director of military analysis at Defense Priorities, questioned whether Trump had the authority to block sales of Bombardier in the U.S. market.
“He can’t just ban their sale,” she said. “He can try to impose tariffs; he can impose other economic barriers; he can ask the FAA to decertify them. There are other things he can do, but he can’t just ban it like that.”
Kavanagh said Trump may be “frustrated” at Canada for not caving to his latest bout of trade threats and is expressing his willingness to deepen the conflict rather than level specific tariffs against specific products.
“The spirit of the post is kind of what to interpret, rather than the actual literal statement.”
The Federal Aviation Administration, not the White House, is the agency that certifies or decertifies aircraft in the U.S.
Bombardier models remain U.S. certified and the company is currently exempt from U.S. tariffs.
His Bombardier comments came just hours after the president had also voiced complaints about the value of the Canadian dollar, marking a new line of economic attack against Canada.
“Canada’s (currency) Dollar imbalance with the U.S. is unacceptable,” he said. “It has been that way for years — but no longer!”
Those comments somewhat resemble complaints that Trump levelled against China for more than a decade, calling the country a “currency manipulator” for the way it artificially depressed the value of its Yuan.
Lower value currencies are viewed as advantageous for exporting nations, as it lets companies receive a higher-value currency in exchange for the goods they sell. Still, stronger currencies are generally viewed more favourably than weak ones for the buying power it affords consumers. Trump, whose bellicose trade policy has long sought to expand export capacity by attracting more manufacturers back inside U.S. borders, has long viewed the strong U.S. dollar as a detriment.
Charles St-Arnaud, chief economist at Servus Credit Union, said Trump’s decision to target the Canadian dollar likely reflects the president’s desire to eliminate the U.S.’s trade deficit with Canada.
“The problem is that a stronger Canadian dollar would do next to nothing to reduce the U.S. trade deficit with Canada, because most of that deficit is due to U.S. oil imports,” he said.
On Monday, the Canadian dollar was valued at $0.72 per US$1. The loonie was last valued higher than the U.S. in 2011, when high oil prices had rapidly inflated the value of the Canadian dollar.
Additional reporting from Tracy Moran
Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.
Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.
Facts Only
* U.S. President Donald Trump posted over 60 messages on Truth Social regarding Canada and Bombardier just before a trade deadline.
* Trump stated, "No more selling Bombardier in the United States!"
* Trump complained about the imbalance between the Canadian and U.S. dollar values.
* Canada’s counter-tariffs of 15 per cent to 50 per cent on $28 billion worth of goods are set to take effect at midnight Tuesday.
* Trump claimed the threat against Bombardier was in response to Canada blocking U.S.-based aerospace companies from operating in Canada.
* The Federal Aviation Administration certifies aircraft in the U.S., and Bombardier models remain U.S. certified.
* The President also voiced concern over the Canadian dollar's value relative to the U.S. dollar.
* Charles St-Arnaud suggested a stronger Canadian dollar would not reduce the trade deficit, citing U.S. oil imports as the main factor.
Executive Summary
Full Take
The narrative employs an aggressive, personalized attack framework against Canada and specific entities like Bombardier to amplify existing trade tensions. The deployment of highly charged rhetoric regarding national symbols ("GREAT American Banks," "Lake America") alongside specific economic grievances (currency imbalance) functions to fuse disparate issues into a single, emotionally resonant conflict designed for social media dissemination. The framing suggests an appeal to nationalist economic self-interest rather than a purely transactional response to trade policy.
The interaction between the threat against Bombardier and comments on currency reflects a strategy of broadening the scope of perceived grievance. By linking a specific product trade dispute with broader monetary dissatisfaction, the communication seeks to establish a larger pattern of unfairness that requires systemic correction. The commentary from analysts suggests that while currency dynamics are acknowledged, the actual structural impediment to reducing the trade deficit is rooted in commodity flows, indicating a potential mismatch between the rhetorical focus and the underlying economic reality. This dynamic reveals an attempt to leverage public sentiment against perceived external actors rather than engaging in narrowly defined negotiation strategies.
What assumptions about the relationship between symbolic rhetoric and enforceable economic action are being made? How does tying product availability to national identity affect the agency of involved parties? If the core issue is fundamentally structural (oil imports), how effective is it for symbolic pressure to shift actual policy outcomes? What incentives exist for actors to prioritize performative conflict over pragmatic negotiation regarding trade imbalances?
Sentinel — Human
This text appears to be human-written journalism that synthesizes specific public statements, trade details, and expert commentary regarding U.S.-Canada economic tensions.
