Skip to content
Chimera readability score 80 out of 100, Expert reading level.

Published March 29, 2026
N Engl J Med 2026;395:9-19
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2600949
Abstract
Background
Assessing intermediate coronary lesions with an intracoronary pressure wire improves clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, clinical use of pressure-wire–based physiological assessment remains low. Measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary angiographic images alone correlates well with pressure-wire–based FFR measurements and may simplify procedures, but its effect on clinical outcomes is unknown.
Methods
In this international noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned patients undergoing coronary angiography who were found to have at least one intermediate coronary stenosis to physiological assessment with measurements derived from angiographic images (FFRangio) or with pressure-wire–based measurements. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or unplanned, clinically indicated coronary revascularization at 1 year. The noninferiority margin was 3.5 percentage points.
Results
A total of 1930 patients were randomly assigned to physiological assessment with FFRangio (FFRangio group; 965 patients) or a pressure-wire–based approach (pressure-wire group; 965 patients). The mean age of the patients was 68.4 years, and 25.0% of the patients were women. At 1 year, a primary end-point event had occurred in 64 patients (Kaplan–Meier estimate, 6.9%) in the FFRangio group and 65 patients (Kaplan–Meier estimate, 7.1%) in the pressure-wire group (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.70 to 1.39; difference, −0.2 percentage points; upper boundary of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval, 2.1 percentage points; P<0.001 for noninferiority). There were no apparent differences between the groups with respect to the incidence of bleeding, acute kidney injury, or procedure-related adverse events.
Conclusions
Among patients with intermediate coronary-artery lesions undergoing physiological assessment in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, an angiography-guided strategy involving FFRangio was noninferior to a pressure-wire–guided strategy with respect to a composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, or unplanned clinically indicated coronary revascularization at 1 year. (Funded by CathWorks; ALL-RISE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05893498.)
Are you a member of an institution such as a university or hospital?Learn more about Institutional Access
Notes
This article was published on March 29, 2026, at NEJM.org.
A data sharing statement provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org.
Supported by CathWorks.
Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org.
Supplementary Material
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2026 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
For personal use only. Any commercial reuse of NEJM Group content requires permission.
History
Published online: March 29, 2026
Published in issue: July 2, 2026
Topics
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Altmetrics
Citations
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.
Cited by
- Physiological Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease, New England Journal of Medicine, 395, 1, (80-83), (2026)./doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2602134
- CRT 2026 late breaking trials in coronary interventions: A narrative review of the trial designs, hypotheses, and findings, Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, (2026).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2026.06.020
- Fractional Flow Reserve: Scoping Review with ☸️SAIMSARA, SAIMSARA Journal, 1, 1, (2026).https://doi.org/10.62487/saimsara5168025d
- Artificial Intelligence–Derived Coronary Physiology Comes of Age—Promises, Precision, and Pragmatism in the Cath Lab, Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, (105514), (2026).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscai.2026.105514
- Physiology Still Matters, JACC, (2026).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2026.05.012
- Reply - PPG meta-analysis: methodological and clinical considerations, Atherosclerosis, 417, (120775), (2026).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2026.120775
- Weekly Journal Scan: The ALL-RISE of angiography-derived physiology to guide percutaneous coronary intervention, European Heart Journal, (2026).https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehag378
- Fractional flow reserve estimated from the invasive angiogram: limitations and next steps, Nature Reviews Cardiology, 23, 7, (445-446), (2026).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-026-01302-x
- Expanding physiology beyond the wire: will 2026 be the defining year?, EuroIntervention, 22, 9, (e467-e468), (2026).https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00289
- Redefining Physiology in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, New England Journal of Medicine, 395, 1, (83-85), (2026)./doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2603714
- See more
Loading...

Sentinel — Human

Confidence

The text exhibits the highly structured, precise language of formal medical research, consistent with human authorship in a peer-reviewed journal context.

Signals Detected
low severity: Standardized scientific reporting structure; complex statistical data integration without unnecessary rhetorical flourish.
low severity: High internal logical flow typical of peer-reviewed medical literature, presenting a focused noninferiority trial result.
low severity: Adherence to established statistical reporting conventions (Kaplan-Meier, HR, CI) and clear attribution of data sources (NEJM).
low severity: The specific complexity of the statistical results (HR, CIs, noninferiority margin) suggests input from a specialized domain, though LLMs can mimic this structure.
Human Indicators
The precise citation format and embedded footnotes reference institutional permissions and data sharing statements typical of official journal publication.
The complex statistical outcomes (Hazard Ratio 0.98; CI 0.70 to 1.39) require deep, specific knowledge integration that is difficult for general-purpose LLMs to generate credibly without direct source input.