After more than half a century of federal protections, the Trump Administration on Tuesday announced a proposal to return management of grizzly bears in the Lower 48 to the states.
Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum, flanked by governors Greg Gianforte of Montana, Mark Gordon of Wyoming, and Brad Little of Idaho, heralded the new rule at a press conference in the heart of grizzly country north of Yellowstone National Park.
“The grizzly bear recovery story is one of America’s greatest conservation successes,” Gianforte said from a makeshift stage just south of Big Sky, Montana. He cited a downside of the bears’ 50-year recovery and pointed to increasing bear-human conflicts in front yards, playgrounds and ranch pastures. “Montana is ready to have full authority to manage grizzly bears,” he said. (Disclosure: Before either became governor, Mark Gordon and Brad Little both served on the High Country News’ board of directors, from 2001-2004 and 1998-2002, respectively.)
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in 1975 listed grizzlies as “threatened” in the Lower 48 states under the Endangered Species Act. At the time, fewer than 600 members of the species existed south of the Canadian border. Today, two major populations thrive in and around Yellowstone and Glacier national parks, each with approximately 1,000 bears — along with a smattering of smaller ecosystems that could support grizzlies with far fewer resident bruins.
The federal government has twice attempted to remove Endangered Species Act protections for grizzlies, specifically in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. The move to delist bears would mean returning management to the states of Idaho, Montana and Wyoming. Both efforts, in 2007 and 2017, respectively, were overturned in court. Yet states kept petitioning to remove federal protections. In January 2025, during the final hours of the Biden administration, FWS denied those petitions and released a new rule perpetuating the bears’ protected status.
The rule announced today took a different approach, amending the Biden administration’s 2025 edict: Instead of delisting grizzlies, the bears will stay on the endangered species list. But under a new revision of section 4(d) of the Endangered Species Act, the federal government will concede grizzly management to the states.
“I think of this as a dress rehearsal for delisting,” said Christy Clark, director of Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, after the meeting concluded.
“I think of this as a dress rehearsal for delisting.”
For decades, concerns over delisting have centered around a grizzly hunt that could come with state management. However, Montana has a five-year moratorium on pursuing the animals post-delisting and Gianforte said the new rule would not permit a hunt in Montana.
The text of the new 4(d) rule is yet to be published, but all three speakers and Secretary Burgum stressed that the new rule would grant states more flexibility to manage grizzlies on the ground as the states transition from an era of grizzly recovery to stewardship of the species.
Ultimately, critics say, the move could mean increased grizzly mortality.
“We’re disappointed the Trump administration is trying to make it easier to kill grizzly bears,” said Andrea Zaccardi, senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, a nonprofit organization dedicated to species protection.
Jenny Harbine, managing attorney at the nonprofit environmental law firm Earthjustice, cited a slew of grizzly-bear threats coming down the pike from the federal government: weakened environmental reviews, a rescinded roadless rule, and fast-tracked logging and mining projects.
“This does not create a situation where the service should be relaxing protections for grizzly bears,” Harbine said. “They need them more than ever.”
Robert Chaney contributed to this reporting.
This story was produced as part of the Western Environmental Reporting Collaborative, a partnership between Mountain Journal/Montana Free Press, High Country News, Report for America and local news organizations across the West.
Facts Only
* The Trump Administration announced a proposal to return management of grizzly bears in the Lower 48 states to the states on Tuesday.
* Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum spoke at a press conference in Montana.
* Montana Governor Greg Gianforte, Wyoming Governor Mark Gordon, and Idaho Governor Brad Little attended the announcement.
* The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service listed grizzlies as "threatened" in the Lower 48 states under the Endangered Species Act in 1975.
* Two major grizzly populations exist in and around Yellowstone and Glacier national parks, each with approximately 1,000 bears.
* The federal government attempted to remove Endangered Species Act protections for grizzlies twice, in 2007 and 2017, both of which were overturned in court.
* In January 2025, the FWS denied state petitions and released a new rule perpetuating grizzly bear protected status.
* The new rule amends the Biden administration’s 2025 edict by granting federal concession of grizzly management to the states under a revision of section 4(d) of the Endangered Species Act, while keeping bears on the endangered species list.
* Montana has a five-year moratorium on pursuing a grizzly hunt post-delisting, and the new rule would not permit a hunt in Montana.
* Speakers stressed the rule would grant states more flexibility for on-the-ground management.
Executive Summary
The Trump Administration proposed returning management authority for grizzly bears in the Lower 48 states to the states, following over fifty years of federal protection. Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum and state governors from Montana, Wyoming, and Idaho supported this proposal during a press conference. This new rule amends a previous statement by establishing that while grizzlies remain on the endangered species list, federal management authority shifts to the states under a revision of section 4(d) of the Endangered Species Act. This change aims to grant states greater flexibility in managing grizzly bears locally as they transition from a period of recovery to stewardship.
The proposal addresses past federal attempts to delist bears, which were overturned in court, and a recent denial of state petitions by the Fish and Wildlife Service in January 2025. While the proposed rule does not delist the species, it transfers management control to the states. Critics argue this shift could increase grizzly bear mortality, citing concerns about potential hunting and threats from federal actions related to environmental regulation. Furthermore, environmental groups point to existing federal pressures, such as weakened environmental reviews and pending logging projects, suggesting that protections are more needed than relaxed.
Full Take
Sentinel — Human
The text reads like a standard, fact-based news report that synthesizes policy announcements, expert commentary, and opposing viewpoints, exhibiting characteristics typical of collaborative reporting.
