Skip to content
Chimera readability score 0.5613 out of 100, reading level.

War in Iran tests loyalty among Trump's base at this year's CPAC
Members of the Republican faithful are gathering in Dallas on Saturday for the final day of the Conservative Political Action Conference, or CPAC, the annual event known for high-profile appearances from the most prominent figures in the MAGA movement. And while celebrations of President Trump's agenda have been front and center, missing from the lineup this year was the president himself.
Instead of closing out the multi-day conference with a rally-type address akin to previous years, Trump skipped CPAC this year for the first time in a decade.
His absence comes at a tense moment in his second term. Saturday marks one month since the U.S. began strikes against Iran — a move that has caused divides within the president's historically loyal base.
Here are a few takeaways from the conference so far.
The war in Iran looms over CPAC
While polling shows most Americans may be against the war, CPAC is still the Trump show.
"I think a lot of people feel more confident in [Trump] doing it than a lifelong politician that wants to follow the rules of their party," argued Jeff Hadley, who drove from Raleigh, N.C., to attend CPAC.
While some high-profile conservatives like Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly have been vocal critics of the war, Hadley's view is consistent with many Republicans right now. A recent survey by Pew Research Center found nearly eight in 10 Republicans approve of Trump's handling of the war.
However, peeling back the curtain, that support drops substantially when looking solely at younger Republicans and conservative-leaning independents — two groups that Trump made gains with in 2024.
"I feel betrayed because he's promised no new wars," said 30-year-old attendee Joseph Bolick, an Army and Marine Corp. veteran from Tyler, Texas, who has voted for Trump since 2016 and now says he no longer supports him.
"Why aren't we helping Americans? The economy's suffering," he added. "Why can't we focus on our own people instead of foreign governments?"
One of the few speakers to criticize the war from the stage was former Florida congressman Matt Gaetz.
"A ground invasion of Iran will make our country poorer and less safe," Gaetz said. "It will mean higher gas prices, higher food prices, and I'm not sure we would end up killing more terrorists than we would create."
Midterm conversations largely took a backseat
CPAC has long been regarded as a destination for conservative voters to network and organize, and for popular voices within the GOP to rally their base.
But this year, fewer candidates treated it as a campaign stop. Just a handful of Senate and House candidates spoke at the event.
Among those who spoke was former Republican National Committee chairman Michael Whatley, a candidate for Senate in North Carolina. His message? The midterms will be crucial to deciding the direction of Trump's remaining time in office, because if Democrats take back the House or Senate, they will stall the GOP agenda.
"We will make absolutely sure that Donald Trump is going to get a four-year term, not a two-year term," he said. "We cannot let the left win this election cycle and take away this agenda that we're fighting for every single day."
CPAC saw a lot of new faces this year
Many conservative firebrands were missing from the lineup — from top Trump surrogates like Vice President JD Vance to MAGA media personalities such as Carlson and Kelly. All three have appeared at different CPAC events in recent years.
While there were some familiar faces – including former Trump advisor Steve Bannon – CPAC's lineup this year focused more heavily on newer names in the conservative movement, albeit ones who are less central figures in Trump's traditional orbit.
On Thursday, the final speaking slot of the evening went to Nick Shirley, the 23-year-old content creator who went viral for alleging fraud in Minneapolis day-care centers run by Somali immigrants.
Other prominent speaking slots went to conservative activists from around the world, such as former British Prime Minister Liz Struss and Eduardo Bolsonaro, son of former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro. Their appearances reflected CPAC's broadening ambitions to take MAGA conservatism abroad.
That said, while the speakers list did look different, much of the program still revolved around Trump's key policy priorities, and leaned heavily on culture war issues and concerns about illegal immigration.
MAGA without Trump?
Towards the start of the program on Friday, CPAC chairman Matt Schlapp led a discussion titled, "Can't We All Just Get Along," where he argued that conservatives should acknowledge and welcome differences in opinion.
"How boring would CPAC be if it was all: unity, agreement, vanilla, right?" he said. "We wouldn't want that."
"One of the reasons why, essentially, there is this collaboration and this coalition that stays together is because people embraced Trump and Trumpism," Schlapp added.
But as 2028 inches closer, Trump's absence at CPAC this year is a reminder that he may be the only figure that holds large parts of the party together, and when he's not there, it's unclear who fills that role.

Facts Only

CPAC 2026 took place in Dallas, Texas, from February 2026, with the final day on Saturday.
President Trump did not attend CPAC for the first time in a decade.
The U.S. began strikes against Iran one month before the conference.
A Pew Research Center survey found nearly 80% of Republicans approve of Trump's handling of the war.
Younger Republicans and conservative-leaning independents show lower support for the war.
Joseph Bolick, a 30-year-old Army and Marine Corps veteran, stated he no longer supports Trump due to the war.
Former Florida congressman Matt Gaetz criticized the war during his CPAC speech.
Fewer Senate and House candidates spoke at CPAC compared to previous years.
Michael Whatley, former RNC chairman and North Carolina Senate candidate, emphasized the importance of the midterms.
Newer conservative figures, including 23-year-old content creator Nick Shirley, spoke at CPAC.
International speakers included former British Prime Minister Liz Truss and Eduardo Bolsonaro.
CPAC chairman Matt Schlapp argued that differences in opinion strengthen the conservative coalition.

Executive Summary

The 2026 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Dallas highlighted both unity and division within the Republican base, particularly around President Trump's absence and the ongoing war in Iran. While Trump has been a central figure at CPAC for a decade, his absence this year marked a notable shift, coinciding with tensions over his administration's military strikes in Iran. Polling suggests most Republicans support the war, though younger conservatives and veterans express disillusionment, citing broken promises of avoiding new conflicts. The conference featured fewer high-profile Trump allies, with newer conservative figures and international speakers taking prominence, reflecting an attempt to broaden the MAGA movement globally. Midterm elections were a secondary focus, with some speakers emphasizing their importance in sustaining Trump's agenda. The event underscored the challenge of maintaining Republican cohesion without Trump's direct presence, raising questions about the party's future leadership and ideological direction.

Full Take

The strongest version of this narrative highlights genuine tensions within the Republican base over foreign policy, generational shifts, and leadership succession. The article credibly presents both pro-war and anti-war perspectives within the GOP, acknowledging Trump's enduring influence while noting cracks in his coalition. However, the framing of CPAC as a "Trump show" despite his absence risks oversimplifying the movement's evolution. The emphasis on younger conservatives' disillusionment and the rise of new voices suggests a potential realignment, though the piece doesn't explore whether this is a temporary rift or a lasting fracture.
Patterns detected: ARC-0024 Ambiguity (in framing CPAC's future without Trump), ARC-0043 Motte-and-Bailey (implied unity while highlighting divisions)
The root cause appears to be the tension between Trump's populist nationalism and the GOP's traditional isolationist wing, exacerbated by the Iran war. The narrative assumes Trump's absence is temporary but doesn't interrogate whether the movement can sustain itself without his centralizing force. The implications for human agency are significant: younger conservatives and veterans feel betrayed, while establishment figures double down on electoral strategy. The second-order consequences could include a fractured GOP or the emergence of a new conservative leadership model.
Bridge questions: How might the GOP reconcile its foreign policy divisions without Trump's unifying presence? What would it take for younger conservatives to re-engage with the party's agenda? Are the international speakers at CPAC a sign of ideological expansion or a distraction from domestic priorities?
Counterstrike scan: A coordinated influence campaign would amplify divisions within the GOP, portraying the Iran war as a wedge issue to demoralize Trump's base. The actual content doesn't fully match this pattern, as it presents multiple perspectives rather than exploiting them for manipulation. However, the focus on internal conflict could be leveraged by adversaries to undermine conservative cohesion.

Sentinel — Human

Confidence

This analysis suggests that the article is likely written by a human, with signs of a human-like writing style and a balanced approach to presenting arguments.

Signals Detected
low severity: Sentence length variance is present, indicating a human-like rhythm
medium severity: There's a balanced approach to presenting arguments and counterarguments
low severity: Arguments are presented in a logical flow, but there's no exact match to known template patterns
Human Indicators
The article shows a human-like writing style with varied sentence lengths and balanced argumentation.