With a career spanning five decades and involvement in projects around the world, the British Tunnelling Society’s (BTS) new chair – and Jacobs tunnels director for Europe – Alastair Smith has a depth of knowledge on tunnelling practices and insight into the industry like few others.
The first tunnelling project he was involved in was a drainage scheme in 1986, while pursuing a civil engineering degree at City St George’s University of London – a sandwich course sponsored by his then employer Sir William Halcrow and Partners. “At the time, pipe jacking was an innovative technology and a lot of the lessons I learned on that project are still relevant to today’s methods,” he says.
After his graduation in 1988, he worked on the Channel Tunnel. He was then involved in various international projects including irrigation tunnels in Egypt; a sewer in Paraguay, which was the country’s first ever tunnel; and a flood management system in Denmark.
In the UK, he worked on various water infrastructure schemes, Crossrail and more recently on the tunnels for Hinkley Point C’s cooling system. On the latter he comments: “The connections to the Bristol Channel for the inflow are probably the most technically challenging piece of work I’ve done.”
Smith celebrates the progress made in parts of project delivery, but he is also adamant that changes need to be made in processes and planning to boost efficiency and save money.
“I don’t know if we are building tunnels particularly quicker. We’re certainly building them in more complicated, challenging conditions with better management of all the impacts and the risk. Safety is one thing that we’ve improved hugely,” he says, pointing to Thames Tideway as a “testament to how the industry can deal with risk and safety”.
“We don’t put people in harm’s way in the same way [as we used to] and we have fewer people actually building them,” he says, but he highlights that the number of people supporting projects has grown considerably.
“We need to have a look at why is that happening. We’re getting multiple people doing a similar job, but for different companies. So I think that’s where the inefficiency comes in to some extent.
“I think we also need to have a review of the planning process. We are trying to set the rules too early. This doesn’t allow innovation, doesn’t allow better, more efficient techniques because they are set at a time when we perhaps don’t have all the information we need to work out the best way of doing things.”
He says that all the consenting has added a “huge amount of layers on the way we deliver these projects in the modern environment”.
Smith indicates that the industry could go further in communicating the constraints that it faces, the complexity of the works it has to undertake, and the benefits that tunnelling projects offer – pointing to Crossrail, Thames Tideway and London Power Tunnels.
As a result, he says that the public only remembers the disruption during the construction stage and sees the headlines about the cost of tunnels.
One of the objectives of his tenure as BTS chair is to improve the image of tunnelling. “I think that there is a need [for people] to have a better understanding of everything that’s involved. Tunnels are really complex and they’re rarely a cheap solution. They’re a solution that you need when constraints and disruption [from the construction of other asset types] wouldn’t be acceptable.”
He says that the industry should communicate that ‘there is disruption but there is a need’, as well as the long-term benefits they offer for transport, water and energy resilience. “If the wider public sees some of the things we do underground, they will probably be quite amazed,” Smith adds.
BTS is looking into ways of explaining the benefits of tunnelling to the public better and is exploring with ICE the creation of simple explainers.
He says it is also important for the industry to talk to parliamentarians to “make sure they understand what’s involved and the benefits,” because tunnelling projects are directly influenced by the political decisions of successive governments due to the long duration of the pre-construction period.
He believes that a “full future plan” is needed for infrastructure that will provide that continuity and lead to efficiencies. He finds the 10 Year Infrastructure Strategy a step in the right direction.
I think we also need to have a review of the planning process. We are trying to set the rules too early. This doesn’t allow innovation, doesn’t allow better, more efficient techniques because they are set at a time when we perhaps don’t have all the information we need to work out the best way of doing things
Another area he wants to focus on during his tenure is the training of tunnelling engineers. He says companies in the industry struggle to find engineers with tunnelling skills coming out of university, especially since the termination of the Tunnelling MSc at the University of Warwick.
“As an industry, we are training them, but we’ve lost that year of dedicated education in things that are aligned to what we need in tunnelling” – not just how tunnels are built but also the management of risk.
Recently, BTS delivered a five-day design and construction course at the University of Warwick, but he says such courses can only “scratch the surface” of the information needed. The society is trying to bring back the MSc, with Smith calling for support from the industry.
“We just need to get commitment from tunnelling consultants and contractors that they’ll put enough students through to make it viable for the university to run it. It’s very important for the industry that we get something that allows us to train people.”
The industry also has to come together to push innovation in regard to decarbonisation, which Smith describes as a challenge because tunnelling requires moving large amounts of spoil and high volumes of concrete.
“It’s that same old problem that everyone wants to innovate, but nobody wants to go first. We are dealing with assets that are meant to be there for 100, 120 years and someone’s investing a lot of money. How do you give that confidence that it’s going to do the job for that time frame?”
He continues: “We’ve been using cement replacements for a lot of years. Where you set your baseline, I think needs to be more challenging for the industry.”
He believes that rather than individual industry players or clients testing different innovations, it would be better to have a “coordinated research programme with universities and get sets of data that we can all buy into in terms of design”.
“There was work done in pipe jacking in the ‘80s and the University of Cambridge did a lot of research for the industry. I think we could do with a programme that would serve the industry and allow us to be able to certify the innovative materials quicker and reduce the risk for the clients.”
BTS has set up a Net Zero Tunnelling Group to try and share best practise on carbon reduction, and clients have a key role to play. “I think if big clients take a lead and provide that information, then the industry will start taking it on board in other projects. National Grid has shown as a client a willingness to support innovation, help fund it and do the research.”
Smith adds: “We are all quite excited to see what Lower Thames Crossing is doing. We will have regular talks with the LTC team about the good things they are doing so we can share that information.
“The tunnelling society itself is about sharing best practise knowledge,” he emphasises. “We are educating, we are writing standards.”
With more than 800 members and over 80 corporate members, the society offers a platform for tunnelling engineers to learn from each other and push the industry forward.
“We shouldn’t underestimate the effort that BTS puts in to keep us at the forefront of best practise. Through our links with the ITA [International Tunnelling and Underground Space Association] we’re influencing the way tunnels are built, developed and promoted globally as well. I think it’s important as a chair to try and continue that, with the support of the people on the committee who are equally passionate about the different things that we do.”
Have your say
or a new account to join the discussion.
Facts Only
* Alastair Smith is the new chair of the British Tunnelling Society (BTS) and director for Europe at Jacobs tunnels.
* Smith was involved in a drainage scheme in 1986 while studying civil engineering.
* He worked on the Channel Tunnel after graduation in 1988.
* He participated in international projects including irrigation tunnels in Egypt, a sewer in Paraguay, and flood management in Denmark.
* In the UK, he worked on water infrastructure schemes, Crossrail, and Hinkley Point C cooling system tunnels.
* Smith noted the connections to the Bristol Channel for inflow in the Hinkley Point C project were technically challenging.
* He believes changes are needed in processes and planning to boost efficiency and save money.
* Smith notes that safety has improved significantly.
* He identifies inefficiency stemming from multiple entities performing similar work.
* Smith calls for a review of the planning process because setting rules too early limits innovation.
* He suggests the industry should communicate the constraints and benefits of tunnelling projects more clearly to the public.
* The BTS is exploring ways to explain tunnelling benefits and creating simple explainers with ICE.
* Smith advocates for improved training by reinstating a Tunnelling MSc, requiring commitment from consultants and contractors.
* Decarbonization in tunnelling is challenged by the need to move spoil and concrete.
* He proposes a coordinated research program with universities to certify innovative materials quickly.
Executive Summary
Full Take
The narrative balances celebrating technical achievements—like safety improvements and global project experience—with a critical demand for systemic change in industry practice. The core tension lies between the operational reality of complex infrastructure delivery (which necessitates long planning periods and risk management) and the need for efficiency, innovation, and public understanding. Smith’s arguments against current planning processes suggest a pattern where established regulatory frameworks inadvertently stifle emergent solutions by being finalized before full technical understanding is achieved. This suggests a systemic resistance to the iterative nature of complex engineering problem-solving in favor of rigid, front-loaded constraint setting.
A significant implication emerges from his call for coordination: moving from fragmented innovation toward a "coordinated research programme" addresses a structural deficiency in how risk and material science are integrated into project lifecycles. The critique regarding public perception—that disruption is emphasized over long-term benefit—points to a misalignment between the technical complexity of tunnelling and the communication strategy used by the industry. This implies that the cost of innovation is often borne by those implementing changes rather than being factored into initial planning. Furthermore, the resistance to change in training pipelines (the stalled MSc) suggests an internal inertia where established knowledge structures prioritize existing models over fostering adaptable expertise necessary for future, uncertain challenges like deep decarbonization requirements. The effort to leverage client influence (like National Grid’s support) as a driver for industry-wide material innovation points toward shifting the locus of responsibility from singular players to shared, outcome-based accountability in long-term asset management.
Bridge Questions: If clients are willing to fund research and push for data-driven certification, what specific mechanisms could enforce this shift away from localized innovation? How can regulatory bodies be incentivized to adopt iterative, adaptive planning models that accommodate evolving technical knowledge rather than enforcing fixed rules upfront? What tangible metrics would demonstrate that the industry’s commitment to long-term asset resilience is prioritized over short-term cost minimization during the planning phase?
Sentinel — Human
The text reads like a sophisticated interview or editorial where a subject's experience and expert opinion are central, exhibiting the nuanced rhythm and argumentative progression typical of human-authored analysis.
