Published on: August 13, 2026
10 min read
Demos haven't always looked like this. Looking back over my career, here's how they have evolved. Follow the tutorial to build your own demo and agent.
A demo used to take me days to build — screenshots, narration, stitching it together in an external tool, chasing feedback — and every time the feature changed I'd have to start over. A few months ago, I handed most of that to an agent in GitLab Duo Agent Platform.
GitLab Duo Agent Platform is built for intelligent orchestration, running agentic workflows across the software development lifecycle, but it's flexible enough to take on repetitive work outside of development, too. When I pointed it at demo generation instead, it worked well enough that I think you should try the same thing with something on your own plate. I created this hands-on tutorial to help you get started. And one more thing: You don't need to be a developer to do this. We've seen an increase in interest from non-engineering roles in using GitLab to run agentic workflows like this one. If that's you, follow along to get started.
In this article:
🎯 Try GitLab Duo Agent Platform today!
People connect faster when they see a feature in action rather than read about it. But live demos are hard: You need product access and enough familiarity to navigate confidently.
A click-through demo solves that. You take real actions yourself, guided by a short narrative at each step. Unlike video, it puts you in control of the pace. And unlike live access, which requires a real environment, it's just a link: free to share, reusable, and consistent every time.
Explore examples in the GitLab Demo Hub.
Demos haven't always looked like this. Looking back over my career, here's how they have evolved:
Each layer made demos more accessible; the agentic layer is what makes them sustainable.
Creating a click-through demo involves these stages:
Together, these steps can take days, and the moment something changes in the product, you have to start over from Step 3.
An agent can help with almost all of these steps: reading docs, scanning issues, pulling context from Slack, populating demo data in the project, and pulling out what matters most. It can't fully replace the human who decides what to create and reviews the results before they ship, but it can do a remarkable amount of the groundwork.
In the agentic tool I built, the Click-Through Demo Generator, I focused on automating Steps 1, 2, 5, 6, and 9: the ones with clear inputs, predictable outputs, and previously fully manual execution. The other steps can also be handled by specialized agents.
The agent works like this: Drop screenshots into a folder in the project, optionally with a context.md
for background on the feature, and trigger the workflow from an issue comment. The agent reorders and renames the screenshots, writes the narration, builds the demo with a built-in branded template, and opens a merge request. Review it, and once you merge it, the demo auto-publishes to GitLab Pages. If something needs to change, ask the agent to update it.
Under the hood, a Custom Flow gets triggered. The agent calls a custom tool I built to assemble the demo into an HTML template, overlaying each screenshot with its narration message box, and comments the merge request link back on the issue. A skill guides its writing so the narration follows GitLab's marketing messaging, focused on customer outcomes rather than our own features.
Here's the actual instruction text from that skill's SKILL.md
that the agent reads and follows every time it writes narration:
"Great narration sells an outcome, not a UI tour. Someone who clicks through should understand what problem the product solves, why this approach is better, and what they could now do, without reading any docs.
Structure every demo as three acts: Open on the customer's pain, show the product solving it step by step, and close by naming the value they walk away with."
For demos in more languages, we just need to add a localization skill to the project, and every demo gets automatically localized from then on.
Publishing to the Demo Hub, our production demo portal, is just as hands-off as publishing the demo itself. When a demo is ready to ship, you tag it as production in the development gallery. That's the cue for the agent to run a skill in this project that reaches into the Demo Hub project and does the rest: It writes a short description, stamps it with today's date, tags it as new, and opens a merge request adding the demo as a card. Merging that MR, and putting the demo live, is still a human's call.
A click-through demo is really just a set of files: HTML, screenshots, and config, which makes it a great fit to live in a repo. The demo is no longer trapped in a separate tool that only a few people know how to use. It lives in a GitLab project, which means it can be:
The demo becomes a team asset, not a one-person task. That's a big deal. More teammates can now create demos, review them, improve them, and publish them, without needing any special tool knowledge. If you can open an issue and approve an MR, you can use this workflow.
Fork the Click-Through Demo Generator project and read the README for the full setup. Custom Flows aren't copied over when you fork a project, so you'll also need to enable the Generate click-through demo flow (you'll need to be logged in to GitLab to view it) in your forked project. From there, the README walks you through everything else.
This project would have been significantly harder without GitLab Duo Agent Platform.
GitLab Duo Agent Platform gave me the missing infrastructure: a Custom Flow that triggers from an issue comment, a container image I define with exactly the runtime and dependencies it needs, and built-in tools to work with GitLab directly, like opening merge requests and commenting on issues. The merge request is where I review the demo before merging it and letting the agent publish it to the Demo Hub.
In platform terms, this is agentic automation — the Custom Flow orchestrating the agent's behavior while GitLab’s built-in tools let it work with issues, project files, merge requests, and GitLab Pages without requiring separate integrations.
Custom Flows let you define your own multi-step workflow and extend the agent with custom tools, like the tool I built to assemble screenshots and narration into the demo's HTML template. You implement that capability yourself, and it runs as part of the flow, on GitLab's compute.
Everything happens inside GitLab: the request, the review, the output, the deployment. That's what makes the workflow faster, clearer, and easier to hand off.
Zoom out from my own workflow for a second and focus on what happens when repetitive work gets handed to an agent with access to your GitLab data. For a team lead, that's fewer cycles spent producing collateral and more spent reviewing and deciding. The same shift shows up anywhere a team has a repeatable, well-scoped task sitting on top of GitLab context.
Start small and simple. The demo generator is just one example of the pattern, but you don't need to write code or use a Custom Flow to get started. Start with a single agent, give it one clear job, and see what it can do before reaching for anything more complex.
In this quick tutorial, you'll build your first agent, one that helps you plan your work and saves you time. Don't have access to GitLab Duo Agent Platform? You can start a free trial to follow along. Two tasks, about 10 minutes total:
Task 1: Create a custom agent. In the GitLab UI, create a custom agent called "Daily Planner." Tell it what priority means to you — for example, issues blocking a teammate, anything due this week, or "treat anything with the customer label as top priority regardless of due date." Have it look at your assigned issues and merge requests, apply those rules, and tell you what to tackle first, what's blocking others, and what can wait.
Task 2: Enable it and review. Enable the agent in your project, then open GitLab Duo Agentic Chat, select it, and ask it to plan your day. It has built-in access to GitLab, so it pulls your actual assigned issues and MRs itself. Compare its plan to what you'd have figured out yourself, and adjust the agent's instructions until the plan is genuinely useful.
Congratulations, you just built your first agent, and it's already making your day a little easier. This is where it gets fun: Start thinking about what else you'd hand it, another decision you're tired of making yourself. Keep going, and that single-purpose agent turns into the assistant that runs your whole workflow.
Enjoyed reading this blog post or have questions or feedback? Share your thoughts by creating a new topic in the GitLab community forum.
Share your feedbackStart building faster today
See what your team can do with the intelligent orchestration platform for DevSecOps.
Facts Only
* Published on August 13, 2026.
* GitLab Duo Agent Platform is used for agentic workflows in the software development lifecycle.
* The Click-Through Demo Generator automates steps 1, 2, 5, 6, and 9 of the demo creation process.
* The agent requires screenshots and an optional context.md file to function.
* Demos are assembled into HTML templates and published via GitLab Pages.
* A "skill" in the SKILL.md file directs the agent to structure narration into three acts: customer pain, product solution, and final value.
* The Demo Hub is the production portal for published demos.
* Custom Flows allow the definition of multi-step workflows and the integration of custom tools.
* Users can create a "Daily Planner" agent to prioritize issues and merge requests.
* The platform provides a free trial for those without current access.
Executive Summary
The GitLab Duo Agent Platform enables the automation of repetitive tasks across the software development lifecycle through agentic workflows. A primary application of this technology is the generation of click-through demos, which traditionally require manual screenshotting, narration, and assembly. By utilizing Custom Flows and specific "skills"—such as marketing-focused narration guidelines—the platform can automate the assembly of HTML-based demos and their publication to GitLab Pages and a production Demo Hub.
This system transitions demo creation from a siloed, manual task to a collaborative team asset managed via merge requests. While the agent handles groundwork like reading documentation and populating data, human oversight remains necessary for final review and publication decisions. Beyond demo generation, the platform is positioned as a general-purpose tool for intelligent orchestration, capable of assisting non-developers with tasks such as daily work planning and issue prioritization based on custom-defined rules.
Full Take
The strongest version of this narrative is that "agentic orchestration" represents a shift from AI as a chatbot to AI as a collaborator integrated into the actual tooling of work. By embedding AI within the version control system (GitLab), the friction between "doing the work" and "documenting the work" is reduced, potentially democratizing technical communication for non-engineers.
However, this is a classic vendor advertorial. The piece uses a personal success story to frame a specific product—the GitLab Duo Agent Platform—as the only logical solution for a common pain point. The load-bearing strategy is to present the vendor's own tool as the essential infrastructure required to achieve the described efficiency, while simultaneously providing a low-friction "onramp" (the Daily Planner tutorial) to lock the user into the ecosystem.
Patterns detected: ARC-0043 Authority Game
The underlying paradigm is the "automation of the mundane," which assumes that the primary value of a human worker is in "reviewing and deciding" rather than "producing." While this increases velocity, the second-order consequence may be a degradation of the craft of storytelling in product demos, as narration is outsourced to a standardized "skill" file. Human agency shifts from creation to curation.
Bridge Questions:
1. If the "groundwork" of communication is fully automated, how does a team maintain a deep, first-principles understanding of their product's value proposition?
2. What are the security and privacy implications of granting agents broad access to Slack, issues, and project files to "pull context"?
Counterstrike Scan: A coordinated campaign would use a "productivity hack" narrative to normalize the surrender of workflow control to a proprietary black-box agent. The content matches the structural pattern of a vendor-led adoption push, though it remains a standard marketing effort rather than a malicious influence operation.
Sentinel — Human
This text reads like an experienced practitioner sharing a practical workflow and lesson learned about using agentic tools, exhibiting a distinct, experiential voice rather than purely synthetic exposition.
