The contemporary bioregional movement emerged from the 1960s counterculture, anti-war activism, ecological thought, and back-to-the-land experiments, but the impulse behind it is far older. Human societies have historically developed in relationship with particular landscapes, and for most of human history, culture was inseparable from place. Today, such place-based relationships remain especially evident within Indigenous and other Earth-based traditions.
Northern California became one of the movement’s early centers. A network of writers, artists, activists, and organizers sought to renew relationships among humans, the more-than-human world, and the places they inhabited. Many were of European settler descent and were grappling with the ecological and cultural consequences of colonization and industrial society.
Among the most influential figures in early bioregional organizing was the ecological activist Peter Berg. A former member of San Francisco’s “Diggers,” Berg co-founded the Planet Drum Foundation with Judy Goldhaft in 1973. Planet Drum provided important pre-internet communication among communities experimenting with place-based ways of living and continues to support bioregional organizing today.
In 1976, Berg published Amble Towards Continent Congress, an essay that would become foundational to the emerging bioregional movement.[1] Berg envisioned congress as an ongoing process of coming into relationship with the living continent. In Berg’s conception, congress was a verb rather than a noun. He described congressing as a lifelong exploration of renewing our relationships with the places we inhabit and with one another.
Two years later, Berg collaborated with conservation biologist Raymond F. Dasmann to further develop the concept of the bioregion. In their influential 1978 essay Reinhabiting California, they defined a bioregion as both “geographical terrain and a terrain of consciousness—to a place and the ideas that have developed about how to live in that place.”[2] This conception of a bioregion advances an integral understanding of bioregionalism that bridges the ecological and cultural dimensions of human existence. From this perspective, bioregions are defined not only by watersheds, climate, soils, flora, and fauna, but also by the stories, practices, and cultural traditions that emerge through enduring relationships with particular places.
One of the defining features of the first era of contemporary bioregional organizing (early 1970s – 2009) was the bioregional congressing process. In the 1970s, another important center of bioregional organizing was taking shape in the Ozarks. Inspired by many of the same currents influencing organizers in California, David Haenke convened the first Ozark Area Community Congress (OACC, pronounced like an “oak” tree) in 1980. OACC continues to bring together people interested in ecological restoration, local culture, and regional self-reliance. It is the longest-running bioregional congress, celebrating its forty-seventh year in 2026. At the second OACC in 1981, participants adopted a resolution calling for a continental-scale bioregional congress. After several years of organizing, the first North American Bioregional Congress was held in the Ozarks in 1984.
Between 1984 and 2009, ten continental-scale bioregional congresses convened across Turtle Island (North America), with gatherings taking place in the United States, Mexico, and Canada. Congresses brought together several hundred participants at a time to share knowledge, build relationships, celebrate place, and develop collective responses to ecological and cultural challenges. Many sought to honor Indigenous peoples, acknowledge historical injustices, and build relationships grounded in respect and solidarity. Indigenous communities participated in numerous bioregional congresses, helping to shape conversations about place, responsibility, and cultural renewal.
Bioregional congresses were intentionally different from conventional conferences. Rather than featuring a small group of experts speaking to passive audiences, participants collectively shaped the agenda. Workshops, watershed reports, council meetings, ceremonies, performances, and shared meals created opportunities for learning across regions and traditions. The first era of the contemporary bioregional movement provided a valuable foundation that helped the movement cohere its identity and principles through the passing of many resolutions by consensus process.
The congresses created spaces for experimentation in ecological culture and governance. Participants exchanged practical knowledge about Indigenous solidarity, watershed restoration, local economies, renewable energy, food systems, green cities, ecological design, and community organizing. They also sought to cultivate relationships strong enough to support long-term action after returning home. Celebration, cultural sharing, theater, music, and art were also central to the congresses.
Although the continental congressing process paused after 2009, bioregional work never disappeared. Across North America and beyond, watershed councils, Indigenous-led stewardship initiatives, regenerative agriculture projects, local food networks, rights of nature campaigns, and countless community resilience efforts continued to carry the bioregional vision forward, even if not by name.
A renewed interest in bioregional organizing is well underway around the world, marking a second era of the movement. Several factors are contributing to this resurgence. Climate disruption, biodiversity loss, political polarization, and the fragility of global supply and economic systems have prompted many people to look once again to place as a source of resilience and belonging. Bioregional initiatives are now appearing in areas as diverse as finance, law, governance, conservation, education, technology, and cultural renewal. Rather than remaining concentrated primarily on Turtle Island, as during the first era, bioregional organizing has spread globally through a growing network of interconnected initiatives, gatherings, and communities of practice.
The revival of continental congressing through the Eleventh Turtle Island Bioregional Congress (TIBC11) is one expression of this renewed momentum. After a seventeen-year pause in continental-scale congressing, TIBC11 will convene in the Cascadia Bioregion from September 15–19, 2026. Like the congresses that came before it, TIBC11 is intended not as a conventional conference, but as a participatory and co-created process through which participants collectively explore how bioregional approaches might help communities respond to the intertwined ecological and social challenges of our time. TIBC11 will take place during Global Bioregional Month, a broader constellation of events, gatherings, and celebrations occurring across several continents throughout September 2026.
At its heart, bioregionalism remains both practical and hopeful. It begins with a deceptively simple proposition: that human flourishing is mutually dependent upon the flourishing of other beings and the places we call home. The work of bioregionalism, then, is the ongoing effort to become good inhabitants of place.
- [1] Berg, Peter. Amble Towards Continent Congress, 1976.
- [2] Berg, Peter and Raymond F. Dasmann. “Reinhabiting California,” in Reinhabiting a Separate Country, 1978.
Facts Only
* The contemporary bioregional movement emerged from the 1960s counterculture, anti-war activism, ecological thought, and back-to-the-land experiments.
* Northern California was an early center for the movement, involving writers, artists, activists, and organizers.
* Peter Berg co-founded the Planet Drum Foundation with Judy Goldhaft in 1973.
* Peter Berg published "Amble Towards Continent Congress" in 1976.
* In 1978, Berg and Raymond F. Dasmann defined a bioregion as "geographical terrain and a terrain of consciousness—to a place and the ideas that have developed about how to live in that place."
* The first era featured the bioregional congressing process between the early 1970s and 2009.
* David Haenke convened the first Ozark Area Community Congress (OACC) in 1980.
* The first North American Bioregional Congress was held in the Ozarks in 1984.
* Ten continental-scale bioregional congresses convened across Turtle Island between 1984 and 2009.
* The Eleventh Turtle Island Bioregional Congress (TIBC11) is planned to convene in the Cascadia Bioregion from September 15–19, 2026.
Executive Summary
The bioregional movement arose from earlier historical relationships with landscapes, but gained contemporary focus through 1960s counterculture and ecological thought. Early organizing took place in Northern California among figures grappling with the consequences of colonization. Peter Berg was influential, co-founding Planet Drum and publishing foundational ideas on "congressing." The concept of a bioregion was developed by Berg and Raymond F. Dasmann, defining it as both geographical terrain and a terrain of consciousness encompassing place and related ideas. This understanding emphasizes that bioregions are defined by enduring cultural relationships alongside physical geography.
The first era of organizing emphasized the bioregional congressing process, which involved collective shaping of agendas through workshops, ceremonies, and shared learning across regions. Centers like the Ozarks fostered regional self-reliance, culminating in continental congresses that convened across North America between 1984 and 2009, often involving Indigenous participation to address ecological and cultural challenges. While these large-scale gatherings paused after 2009, bioregional principles persisted through ongoing local initiatives like watershed councils and regenerative agriculture projects. A renewed interest is currently shaping a second era of the movement, driven by climate disruption and systemic fragility, expanding organizing globally across diverse fields.
Full Take
The structure of bioregional thought demonstrates a shift from localized concerns to integrated relational frameworks. The definition of a bioregion—merging physical geography with lived consciousness and cultural practice—is a critical conceptual move that challenges purely ecological or strictly cultural demarcations, suggesting an integrationist epistemology. The historical process reveals a pattern where movements are catalyzed by specific social ruptures (counterculture, colonization) before solidifying into abstract philosophical concepts (the congress). The enduring presence of bioregionalism in subsequent initiatives—watershed councils, food networks—indicates that the practical application often precedes and sustains the high-level organizing.
The transition from a concentrated North American focus to a globalized resurgence suggests an inherent tension between localized, place-based knowledge systems and the need for broader systemic solutions demanded by contemporary global crises like climate change. The pattern of convening continental congresses was designed to establish consensus through shared practice, moving beyond expert-led instruction. The current revival signals a recognition that resilience must be framed not just within specific geopolitical boundaries (Turtle Island) but across interconnected economic and governance systems (finance, law, technology). This suggests the ongoing challenge is bridging deep situated knowledge with expansive systemic action, requiring flexible methodologies capable of accommodating both local stewardship and continental responsibility simultaneously.
What assumptions underlie the persistence of this framework? If flourishing is mutually dependent on other beings and places, what structural changes in modern systems—economic, legal, or technological—would honor this interdependence without collapsing into localized fragmentation or prioritizing one mode (ecological or cultural) over the other? How can the participatory nature of congressing be translated into governance mechanisms that secure long-term relational action when scale demands rapid, centralized responses?
Sentinel — Human
The text reads as a deep, historically grounded synthesis of concepts related to bioregionalism, showing strong analytical depth and narrative flow consistent with expert writing.