Sign up here to receive Bellingcat’s biggest investigations by email as soon as they are published.
Satellite images obtained and analysed by Bellingcat show over five miles of new road constructed in Big Bend National Park in southwestern Texas, part of a US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) “Smart Wall” installation, which includes roads, barriers, lighting and cameras.
The project was paused earlier this week after pushback from local residents, politicians and environmental groups.
The roads have been built adjacent to the Rio Grande, through the river’s floodplain and riparian forest, and include construction adjacent to Cottonwood Campground, Santa Elena Canyon, and Mariscal Canyon in the National Park.
The map above traces the new road construction in yellow. An unannotated version of the satellite image showing the new road can be found here while a before image of the same area where no road is visible can be seen here.
The new road extends to Cottonwood Campground, one of four campgrounds in Big Bend National Park.
The road can be seen crossing the riparian forest and smaller drainages before joining the campground access road. Imagery also appears to show bright yellow construction equipment staging in the campground area, where bulldozers were previously seen.
In the southernmost part of Big Bend National Park, additional new road construction is also visible near Mariscal Canyon and connecting to Talley Road.
CBP planning documents indicate that this section of the border will receive a four-to-six foot tall vehicle barrier in addition to the “smart wall” lighting and camera systems. Talley Road currently provides access to riverside backcountry campsites and hiking and boating access to Mariscal Canyon on the Rio Grande.
The map above traces the new road construction in yellow. An unannotated version of the satellite image showing the new road can be found here. A before image of the same area where no road is visible can be seen here.
Support Bellingcat
Your donations directly contribute to our ability to publish groundbreaking investigations and uncover wrongdoing around the world.
CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott described the construction activities as “survey and design work” in an August 13 statement. He also stated that CBP is “building one new access road, improving existing roads, installing detection technology, and placing vehicle barriers in limited, strategic locations.”
However, by August 17 Scott had announced a “pause” of construction activities in the face of bipartisan criticism of the project’s impact to the environment, recreation access, and the local economy
The Big Bend Border Patrol Sector sees the fewest migrant apprehensions of any part of the US southern border, according to CBP’s own data.
Bellingcat is a non-profit and the ability to carry out our work is dependent on the kind support of individual donors. If you would like to support our work, you can do so here. Subscribe to our Newsletter and follow us on Bluesky here, Instagram here, Reddit here and YouTube here.
Facts Only
* US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) constructed over five miles of new road in Big Bend National Park.
* The construction is part of a "Smart Wall" installation including roads, barriers, lighting, and cameras.
* New roads are located adjacent to the Rio Grande, including areas near Cottonwood Campground, Santa Elena Canyon, and Mariscal Canyon.
* Construction in the southern park section connects to Talley Road.
* CBP planning documents specify a four-to-six foot tall vehicle barrier for this section.
* CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott described activities as "survey and design work" on August 13.
* CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott announced a pause in construction activities on August 17.
* The pause followed criticism from local residents, politicians, and environmental groups.
* The Big Bend Border Patrol Sector has the lowest number of migrant apprehensions of any US southern border sector.
* Satellite imagery shows yellow construction equipment in the Cottonwood Campground area.
Executive Summary
US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has constructed over five miles of road within Big Bend National Park as part of a "Smart Wall" initiative. This project integrates physical vehicle barriers, surveillance cameras, and lighting systems along the Rio Grande, specifically affecting riparian forests and areas near key landmarks such as Santa Elena Canyon and Cottonwood Campground.
The project has encountered significant opposition from a bipartisan coalition of politicians, environmentalists, and local residents concerned about the impact on the local economy, recreational access, and the natural environment. While CBP initially characterized the work as survey and design, the agency paused construction on August 17 following this pushback. A point of contention is the perceived necessity of the project, as CBP data indicates that the Big Bend sector records the fewest migrant apprehensions along the southern border. It remains unclear whether the pause is temporary or a permanent cancellation of the planned barriers and roads.
Full Take
The strongest version of this narrative is that a federal agency bypassed standard environmental or public scrutiny to install permanent infrastructure in a protected National Park, despite data suggesting the area is a low-priority zone for migration. The use of satellite imagery provides a verifiable empirical baseline that contradicts the initial "survey and design" framing.
The core tension here is the clash between national security mandates and environmental preservation. The paradigm driving this narrative is the "securitization of nature," where the utilitarian needs of border enforcement override the intrinsic value of protected wilderness. An unstated assumption is that "Smart Wall" technology is a scalable solution regardless of the specific geography or the actual volume of illegal crossings in a given sector.
The implications involve a potential precedent for the erosion of National Park protections. If security infrastructure can be installed based on strategic planning rather than localized need, the concept of a "protected wilderness" becomes conditional. The costs are borne by the ecosystem and the public's recreational agency, while the benefits accrue to federal enforcement capabilities.
Patterns detected: none
Counterstrike Scan: A coordinated influence campaign would likely use highly emotive imagery of destroyed flora and fauna paired with accusations of "secret" government conspiracies to incite outrage. This content avoids that path, relying instead on geospatial evidence and official statements. The content is clean.
Bridge Questions:
1. If the Big Bend sector has the lowest apprehension rates, what specific "strategic" vulnerability does this installation address?
2. How does the legal status of National Park land interact with CBP's authority to construct permanent roads?
3. What metrics would CBP use to determine if a "pause" should become a permanent cessation?