Parliamentary inquiry commissions: Doudou Ka criticizes the government and the opposition and demands the dissolution of the Assembly

The assessment comes from Doudou Ka, president of the Party for Great Senegal (PGS), following parliamentary inquiry commissions. The former minister under Macky Sall claims that all parties should take responsibility for themselves regarding the proceedings. He links the inquiry commissions to an Assembly installed illegally since May 26, 2026, which he terms a "parliamentary coup d'état" violating Article 54 of the Constitution.
Doudou Ka attributes the situation to the head of state's failure to act when he possessed the constitutional power to prevent the alleged perfidy. He argues that the opposition legitimized the parliamentary coup by participating in debates instead of boycotting and resisting. Doudou Ka criticizes the National Assembly's actions under Ousmane Sonko, asserting that venturing into judicial power without preparation constitutes the instrumentalization of institutions, suggesting transparency is not sufficient justification for abuses.
Ultimately, Doudou Ka calls for all oppositions to break ranks with the legislature, urging them to permanently boycott the Assembly, provoke its dissolution, and call for an early election in 2027. He views remaining in the National Assembly as condoning the former Prime Minister and preparing for the PASTEF's next victory, advocating for a return to elections to ensure the institution reflects the public.

* Doudou Ka is the president of the Party for Great Senegal (PGS).
* The assessment follows hearings in parliamentary inquiry commissions.
* A former minister under Macky Sall stated that actors should take responsibility for themselves.
* The commissions stem from an Assembly installed illegally since May 26, 2026.
* This date relates to the alleged exercise of the presidency in violation of Article 54 of the Constitution.
* Doudou Ka points to the head of state's failure to prevent the situation when he had constitutional prerogatives.
* The opposition is accused by Doudou Ka of legitimizing the "parliamentary coup d'état" by participating in debates instead of resistance.
* Doudou Ka denounces abuses by the National Assembly under Ousmane Sonko.
* Venturing into judicial power without preparation crosses a line regarding institutional control.
* Doudou Ka urges oppositions to boycott the Assembly and provoke its dissolution for an early election in 2027.

The narrative frames the ongoing conflict not as a procedural dispute but as a fundamental crisis of institutional legitimacy rooted in executive overreach and institutional capture. The central tension lies between established constitutional order, as perceived by Doudou Ka, and the actions taken by the current political actors within the legislative framework. The strategic move advocated—dissolution leading to an early election—is positioned as the necessary mechanism to restore public sovereignty, suggesting that the current Assembly is irrevocably tainted and cannot be reformed from within.
The pattern suggests a resistance strategy where procedural adherence (staying in the Assembly) is equated with complicity, while outright political action (boycott and dissolution) is framed as the only path to legitimate political authority. The reliance on historical context, specifically referencing previous political movements (PASTEF), suggests an appeal to a cyclical narrative of struggle for power. This moves beyond simple blame assignment toward a call for radical institutional restructuring predicated on popular will.
The underlying implication is that the integrity of the state is inseparable from the legitimacy of its institutions. When institutions are perceived as merely instruments of political maneuvering rather than neutral arbiters, the reliance shifts to direct popular mandate. The pattern is an escalation from internal dispute to external political demand for a complete reset of the political structure based on democratic inclusion, which challenges the premise that legislative action alone can resolve systemic institutional betrayal.
Bridge Questions: What are the practical political and legal mechanisms available to achieve dissolution versus maintaining institutional continuity? How does the perceived illegitimacy of the Assembly affect public trust in subsequent electoral outcomes? If an early election is pursued, what guarantees are necessary to ensure a truly representative and inclusive framework moving forward?