Skip to content
Chimera readability score 71 out of 100, Expert reading level.

AI is starting to make some classrooms look a little more old school.
The University of Chicago Law School is requiring first-year students to keep their laptops closed in class this fall, as part of a broader strategy to ensure students learn to think independently as artificial intelligence becomes ubiquitous in the legal profession.
The move comes as colleges across the country grapple with how generative AI is reshaping higher education. Business Insider reported earlier this month that Brown University said it recently disciplined dozens of students after uncovering what administrators described as a widespread AI-assisted cheating scandal, underscoring how difficult the technology has made traditional take-home assignments and remote assessments.
Rather than trying to ban AI outright, Chicago Law says it is redesigning its curriculum to separate the skills students should develop on their own from those where AI should be embraced.
"We need to make sure that the students are learning to think for themselves," Adam Chilton, dean of the University of Chicago Law School, told Business Insider. At the same time, he said, "We can't just naively try to pretend that you can turn off AI or that students won't use it or they don't need to know it."
The school's new strategy includes laptop-free first-year classes, in-person proctored exams that prevent students from accessing outside materials, and oral defenses for major research papers to ensure students can explain and defend their work. It is also expanding AI instruction by integrating the technology into legal writing courses, adding more AI-focused classes, and providing students access to legal AI tools, including Harvey and Legora.
Chilton said educators have been "a little bit asleep at the wheel" by continuing to assign take-home work that students can complete with AI "without thinking for yourself, without learning for yourself."
He said reports of AI cheating at Brown, Harvard, and other schools reinforced concerns that students could advance through their education without developing rigorous reasoning skills.
The challenge, he said, is that AI has become indispensable in legal practice. Law firms increasingly expect new hires to use technology efficiently and responsibly, making an outright ban unrealistic.
Instead, Chicago's approach is to create what Chilton called "space for both of these modes of learning" — teaching students to think without AI first, then teaching them how to use it ethically once they've built those foundational skills.

Facts Only

* The University of Chicago Law School requires first-year students to keep laptops closed in class this fall.
* This move is part of a strategy to ensure students learn to think independently as artificial intelligence becomes ubiquitous in the legal profession.
* Brown University disciplined dozens of students following an AI-assisted cheating scandal reported by Business Insider.
* The school is redesigning its curriculum to separate skills that require independent thought from those where AI should be embraced.
* New strategies include laptop-free first-year classes and in-person proctored exams that prevent access to outside materials.
* The strategy also includes oral defenses for major research papers to assess student work.
* AI instruction is being integrated into legal writing courses, and AI-focused classes are being added.
* Students are being provided access to legal AI tools, including Harvey and Legora.
* Adam Chilton, dean of the University of Chicago Law School, stated that educators have been assigning take-home work that allows students to complete tasks with AI without developing independent thinking skills.

Executive Summary

The University of Chicago Law School is implementing changes to address the impact of generative AI on legal education, focusing on fostering independent thinking among students. This strategy includes requiring first-year students to keep laptops closed in class and redesigning the curriculum. The institution seeks to separate skills that require independent thought from those where AI should be utilized. Specific measures include laptop-free classes, proctored exams preventing access to outside materials, oral defenses for research papers, and integrating AI instruction into legal writing courses while providing access to legal AI tools like Harvey and Legora. The dean argues that the goal is to ensure students develop foundational reasoning skills before learning how to use AI ethically.

Full Take

The response to ubiquitous technology in education often involves a tension between technological reality and pedagogical goals. The shift described by the law school moves beyond simple prohibition toward an integration strategy, attempting to create space for both critical foundational learning and technological fluency. The underlying pattern suggests that educational systems frequently react to disruptive technologies through control mechanisms—banning or policing usage—rather than fundamentally reshaping the cognitive skills being assessed. The concern is not just about cheating but about the atrophy of internal reasoning capabilities when external tools become accessible shortcuts. This framing implicitly acknowledges a dual necessity: developing intrinsic skill (thinking without AI) and mastering extrinsic tool use (using AI ethically). The challenge lies in the implementation gap; balancing the need to build foundational skills against the practical expectation that legal professionals will ultimately operate within an AI-augmented environment requires significant institutional alignment across academia and practice. What systems are built when the external tools evolve faster than the internal methods for assessing mastery? What structural changes are necessary to redefine what "independent thought" means in a context where technological proficiency is now a prerequisite for professional success?

Sentinel — Human

Confidence

The text reads like a synthesis of news reporting on an emerging educational strategy in response to AI integration, exhibiting the structure and sourcing typical of professional journalism.

Signals Detected
low severity: Moderate sentence length variance; idiomatic phrasing typical of journalistic reporting.
low severity: Passionate focus on an evolving educational challenge, slightly more emphatic in the quotes than a purely neutral summary would be.
low severity: Directly links specific institutional actions (UChicago) to broader context (Brown scandal) using established narrative framing.
low severity: References verifiable entities and reported events (UChicago, Brown, Harvey/Legora); tone suggests summarizing real reporting rather than pure generation.
Human Indicators
Specific citation of a named dean and direct quotes that sound contextually relevant to an academic policy discussion.
Integration of specific, timely details (naming the technology Harvey/Legora) suggests engagement with recent developments.
AI-enabled cheating is forcing some schools to go analog — Arc Codex