On March 28, 2025, a 7.7-magnitude earthquake struck central Myanmar, killing thousands and devastating communities already affected by armed conflict, displacement, and economic collapse.
The quake and its aftershock toppled buildings and collapsed roads and bridges across several of the country’s states and regions. Essential services were brought to the “verge of collapse,” according to the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, impacting millions of people. But rather than receiving support, most were left to contend with the junta’s misuse of aid for military purposes.
Junta officials denied and delayed visas for international emergency response teams, confiscated medicine, extorted and harassed aid workers, and blocked internet access. Areas under the opposition’s control—large swathes of the affected regions—were left “largely devoid of external assistance,” according to an internal UN report. Hundreds of thousands were displaced and exposed to extreme heat without access to clean water or medical care.
The junta took advantage of this catastrophe to ruthlessly attack civilians in affected areas, despite its announcement of a ceasefire to allow for relief. In the two months after the earthquake, the military carried out more than 550 aerial and artillery attacks, killing hundreds of civilians. More airstrikes were launched in April 2025 than in any prior month since the 2021 military coup.
Over the past year, the military has benefitted from increased support from China and Russia. Military operations to retake territory from opposition forces ahead of the junta’s recent sham national elections involved numerous airstrikes killing and wounding civilians that amounted to war crimes.
Earlier this month, the junta convened its new proxy parliament, a military body in all but name. Army chief Sr. Gen. Min Aung Hlaing, who has overseen the military’s war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocidal acts for 15 years, is seeking the role of president.
After the earthquake, the UN Security Council released a statement calling for timely and effective assistance, echoing its December 2022 resolution. But the council has remained largely deadlocked and ineffectual on Myanmar and the junta’s frequent violations of the resolution.
Waves of overlapping crises—humanitarian, man-made, and natural—continue to threaten the lives and well-being of people across Myanmar. The junta has driven these conditions. Governments should increase pressure on the military to protect the rights of everyone in Myanmar, now and in future disasters.
Facts Only
Actor: Junta, United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, international emergency response teams
Event: Earthquake in central Myanmar on March 28, 2025; junta's actions towards aid efforts and civilians after the earthquake; convening of the new proxy parliament
Action: Delayed and denied visas for international emergency response teams; confiscated medicine; extorted and harassed aid workers; blocked internet access; conducted military attacks against civilians in affected areas
Location: Central Myanmar
Date: March 28, 2025; April 2025; ongoing
Executive Summary
Full Take
The earthquake in central Myanmar exacerbated existing crises, primarily driven by the junta's actions. The military took advantage of the disaster to launch attacks against civilians and obstruct aid efforts, revealing a disregard for human life and further entrenching its power. By withholding resources and blocking communication, the junta intentionally impeded relief efforts, compounding the suffering of millions affected by the earthquake and ongoing conflict. The military's actions can be seen as a continuation of their aggressive tactics since the 2021 coup, backed by increased support from China and Russia.
Questions for further inquiry: What motivates the junta to perpetuate violence and obstruct aid? How might regional powers respond to the junta's actions in Myanmar? What role can international communities play in holding the military accountable for their crimes against humanity?
Sentinel — Human
This article appears to be written by a human, as indicated by its descriptive language, personalized tone, and unique argument structure. However, there are low levels of stylometric signals that could potentially suggest AI involvement.
