Skip to content
Chimera readability score 0.5785 out of 100, reading level.

Researchers at Stanford University modeled how many people could die or be disabled in 25 years if vaccines for polio, measles, rubella or diphtheria were no longer available.
Before vaccines, death and disability stalked children. Then shots turned once-common infections into something doctors only read about in textbooks.
When immunization rates drop, however, plagues from the past can come roaring back, as measles has in American communities where parents decided not to vaccinate their children.
Imagine what would happen if even the people who wanted shots couldn’t get them.
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who founded an antivaccination group, is considering changes that could prompt the handful of companies that make most shots for American children to stop selling them here. Over the last year, he has been transforming a government that long championed the lifesaving benefits of vaccines into one that questions their safety here and around the world.
Shortly after Kennedy was nominated, questions swirled over how he might overhaul America’s immunization system. Two Stanford University researchers wondered how many people would suffer if vaccination rates dropped or shots became entirely unavailable for four of the most infamous diseases: polio, measles, rubella and diphtheria.
Outbreaks often start when an American catches one of these illnesses abroad and returns home. So epidemiologists Mathew Kiang and Nathan Lo, who is also an infectious diseases doctor, built a model to simulate how the four contagions could spread from sick travelers based on each state’s vaccination rates.
Since a sizable chunk of the population is currently vaccinated, some of the infections wouldn’t get a foothold right away. But over time, as more babies are born and not vaccinated, a larger share of the population would become susceptible.
The professors ran thousands of simulations for each disease, producing a range of possible outcomes. From there, they figured out the average number of deaths and disabilities over a 25-year period.
Their model shows that at current vaccination rates, the nation is already teetering on the brink of an explosion in measles cases — one that would be virtually wiped out with just a 5% increase in vaccination. But if current rates drop by half, all four diseases could return.
The researchers’ modeling of the worst-case scenario assumes a quarter century where no one could get the shots. It doesn’t account for the likelihood of parents going abroad to find vaccines or politicians intervening to ensure drugmakers offer them again.
But the results demonstrate in stark terms how vital shots are and what’s at stake if policy changes interfere with Americans’ ability to vaccinate their kids.
ProPublica shared the key findings of that scenario with the Department of Health and Human Services. An agency spokesperson didn't address the modeling but said “HHS has not limited access or insurance coverage to any FDA-approved vaccines" and continues to routinely recommend the shots for children.
When they published their paper in early 2025, Kiang and Lo emphasized the outcomes from less extreme drops in vaccination rates, in part because the peer reviewers suggested those were more realistic. Back then, Kennedy was in his earliest days at HHS.
A year later, though, a scenario where no one can get these vaccines doesn’t feel as far-fetched, Kiang said. “Every week that goes by,” he said, “that seems more plausible.”
Lo said that their goal was to show policy makers, “if we make certain decisions, this is what could happen.”
So ProPublica decided to illustrate what a future without vaccines could look like.
If we lost
the vaccine for
Polio
Polio, which mainly affects young children, can invade the nervous system and cause paralysis in the limbs or in the muscles needed to breathe. In the 1950s, many people were kept alive in iron lungs, huge metal contraptions that encased the body up to the neck and used pressure to force air in and out of the lungs.
Ventilators have since replaced the antiquated equipment, but modern medicine can’t reverse the paralysis. The model assumes 1 out of every 200 unvaccinated people who catch polio would become paralyzed.
Imagine if this group of kindergartners became paralyzed by polio.
They would be a tiny sliver of the 23,000 people the model predicts could be paralyzed by polio over 25 years if no one is getting the vaccine.
That 23,000 is the model’s average.* It’s the equivalent of more than a thousand kindergarten classes.
*The model results range from 0 to more than 70,000 cases of paralytic polio.
If we lost
the vaccine for
Measles
Measles is among the most contagious diseases in history. A child can spread it before they even get a rash, and the virus can linger in the air for up to two hours after they leave a room.
Famous for its blotchy spots covering the body, measles is a respiratory disease that can lead to pneumonia and swelling of the brain. Before the vaccine, just about everyone got measles, and every year 400 to 500 Americans died.
The model assumes that 3 out of every 1,000 people infected with measles would die.
6 deaths
Over the last 25 years, six people who contracted measles in the U.S. died from the disease.
If Americans could no longer get the vaccine, the model predicts measles would spread quickly.
The model shows that measles could kill about 290,000 people over 25 years.
If we lost
the vaccine for
Rubella
Rubella, also known as German measles, is usually mild in kids and adults. But it’s devastating to a developing fetus. If an infection occurs very early in pregnancy, there’s up to a 90% chance that the baby will be born with congenital rubella syndrome. These children frequently have heart defects, deafness or blindness — and sometimes all three. Many have intellectual disabilities, too. About a third of babies with the syndrome die before their first birthday. A U.S. rubella epidemic in the mid-1960s left 20,000 newborns with congenital rubella syndrome.
Range of possible outcomes
Babies born with congenital
rubella syndrome
Years
If the vaccine went away, we wouldn’t see babies born with congenital rubella syndrome right away. The unvaccinated children would first need to grow into their childbearing years.
The model shows that cases would begin to climb after about 15 years. And within 25 years, 41,000 babies could be born with congenital rubella syndrome.
If we lost
the vaccine for
Diphtheria
Diphtheria, a major killer of children in the 1900s, was known as the “strangling angel.”
The disease’s name comes from the Greek word for leather because diphtheria’s toxin attacks the respiratory tract. Dead tissue builds up in the throat like a thick piece of hide, sealing off a swollen airway.
For those who escape suffocation, the toxin can damage the nerves and heart. Patients who seem better can drop dead weeks later.
An antitoxin made from the blood of horses needs to be given promptly, but it is in short supply. Children elsewhere in the world have died waiting for it.
The disease is rare and much less contagious than measles or rubella. But it’s also far more deadly. The model assumes only one infected traveler would arrive every five years and that 1 out of every 10 unvaccinated people who catch diphtheria would die.
The researchers found it’s very possible nobody would die of diphtheria in the 25-year period their model covers. But we would be playing a game of high-stakes roulette if we lost the vaccine. There is a chance that the strangling angel could become devastating again.
Remember the 23,000 people who could be paralyzed without a polio vaccine? A world without a diphtheria vaccine could be even worse.
On average, the model predicts 138,000 deaths from diphtheria.
In the worst-case scenario, though, the model shows that more than a million people could die from diphtheria in 25 years without a vaccine.
Methodology
The number of paralytic polio cases, measles deaths, cases of congenital rubella syndrome and diphtheria deaths in this story are the average values generated by a model created by Stanford University researchers Mathew Kiang and Nathan Lo, which ran 2,000 simulations for each disease. When we refer to a “range” of possibilities, we mean the values within the upper and lower bounds of a 95% uncertainty interval — meaning across all simulations, 95% of the results fall within those bounds. For the worst-case scenario of deaths from diphtheria, the number used is the high end of this range.
For polio, the model generated an average of 23,066 cases of paralytic polio and a range of 0 to 74,934 cases.
For measles, the model generated an average of 290,129 deaths and a range of 285,271 to 294,286 deaths.
For rubella, the model generated an average of 41,441 cases of congenital rubella syndrome and a range of 34,876 to 48,373 cases.
For diphtheria, the model generated an average of 138,284 deaths and a range of 0 to 1,460,394 deaths.
For current vaccination rates, the researchers used the average of the rates from 2004 to 2023 in each state.
The six deaths from measles over the last 25 years figure is from a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report.
Last year, the Stanford epidemiologists and other researchers published a peer-reviewed article about this model in the Journal of the American Medical Association that showed what could happen with less severe declines in vaccination.

Facts Only

Stanford University researchers Mathew Kiang and Nathan Lo created a model simulating the spread of polio, measles, rubella, and diphtheria over 25 years if vaccines were unavailable.
The model predicts an average of 23,066 cases of paralytic polio, with a range of 0 to 74,934 cases.
Measles could cause an average of 290,129 deaths, with a range of 285,271 to 294,286 deaths.
Rubella could lead to an average of 41,441 cases of congenital rubella syndrome, with a range of 34,876 to 48,373 cases.
Diphtheria could result in an average of 138,284 deaths, with a worst-case scenario of over 1,460,394 deaths.
The model assumes current vaccination rates and simulates disease spread from infected travelers.
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has questioned vaccine safety and is considering policy changes that could affect vaccine availability.
The Department of Health and Human Services states it has not limited access to FDA-approved vaccines.
The researchers published their findings in the Journal of the American Medical Association in early 2025.
The model does not account for parents seeking vaccines abroad or political interventions to restore vaccine availability.

Executive Summary

Researchers at Stanford University modeled the potential health consequences if vaccines for polio, measles, rubella, and diphtheria became unavailable in the U.S. over a 25-year period. Their findings suggest that without these vaccines, the country could face severe outbreaks, with hundreds of thousands of deaths and disabilities. For example, measles could kill approximately 290,000 people, while diphtheria could cause up to 138,000 deaths on average, with a worst-case scenario exceeding one million fatalities. Polio could paralyze around 23,000 individuals, and rubella could lead to 41,000 cases of congenital rubella syndrome in newborns. The model assumes current vaccination rates and simulates how diseases might spread from infected travelers, with susceptibility increasing as unvaccinated children grow into adulthood.
The context includes concerns about declining vaccination rates and potential policy changes under Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has questioned vaccine safety. While the Department of Health and Human Services states it has not limited access to vaccines, the researchers emphasize the critical role of immunization in preventing resurgences of these diseases. The modeling highlights the fragility of public health protections and the potential consequences of policy shifts that disrupt vaccine availability.

Full Take

The strongest version of this narrative underscores the critical role of vaccines in preventing devastating outbreaks of once-common diseases. The Stanford model provides a data-driven warning about the potential consequences of declining vaccination rates or policy changes that limit access to vaccines. The researchers deserve credit for quantifying the risks and highlighting the fragility of public health protections, especially in the context of rising antivaccine sentiment.
However, the narrative also employs fear appeals (ARC-0012) by emphasizing worst-case scenarios, such as the potential for over a million diphtheria deaths. While the model’s averages are more moderate, the focus on extreme outcomes could amplify anxiety. Additionally, the framing of Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s actions as a direct threat to vaccine availability may oversimplify a complex policy debate, risking a strawman (ARC-0003) of his position.
The root cause of this narrative is the tension between public health imperatives and individual autonomy, a recurring historical pattern. The assumption that policy changes alone could lead to catastrophic outcomes ignores potential mitigating factors, such as global vaccine access or emergency interventions. The implications for human agency are significant: if vaccines become unavailable, the most vulnerable—children and the unvaccinated—would bear the brunt of the consequences.
Bridge questions: What alternative policies could balance vaccine safety concerns with public health needs? How might global vaccine distribution mitigate domestic shortages? What evidence would change your mind about the severity of these predictions?
Counterstrike scan: A bad actor pushing this narrative might exaggerate risks to discredit vaccine skeptics or justify restrictive policies. However, the actual content relies on peer-reviewed modeling and acknowledges uncertainties, suggesting a genuine public health warning rather than a coordinated influence campaign.

Sentinel — Human

Confidence

While this article shows signs of a human writer with varied sentence length and use of hedging, it also presents passionate arguments against vaccine policy changes and lacks the mechanical structure typical of synthetic content.

Signals Detected
low severity: variable sentence length and use of hedging language
medium severity: passionate arguments against vaccine policy changes
low severity: mentions specific researchers and methodology
Human Indicators
use of emotive language ('horrors', 'stalked children'), personal perspective, vivid imagery