Hundreds of faith leaders and organizations sent the Trump administration a letter urging it to review and extend temporary protected status (TPS) for El Salvador before it expires on Sept. 9.
The letter, sent to President Donald Trump, Secretary of Homeland Security Markwayne Mullin, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, called for an extension because conditions in El Salvador remain “unsafe” and the removal of those living in the U.S. would be “detrimental” to communities.
“We believe that sending hundreds of thousands of Salvadoran TPS holders back into an unstable and unfamiliar country that does not have the capability to support its own nationals is a danger to those individuals and a decision that would have severe negative consequences for years to come,” the letter said.
“A thoughtful review of the current conditions in El Salvador, consideration of their contributions as TPS holders to the United States and the administration’s obligation to respect the statutory framework which governs TPS, supports an extension of El Salvador’s TPS designation,” the letter said.
The 97 faith-based organizations and 174 faith leaders “have a shared purpose in respecting human life, upholding the inherent dignity of every individual person, maintaining the family unit, and protecting those who are unable to safely return to their home country due to conflict, natural disasters, or some other extraordinary condition,” the leaders wrote.
The letter was signed by many Catholic leaders and institutions including Archbishop Thomas Wenski of Miami, Archbishop Gregory Hartmayer of Atlanta, and Bishop Stephen Parkes of Savannah, Georgia, as well as individuals from numerous religious orders.
The letter detailed that about 20% of TPS holders from El Salvador entered the U.S. when they were 16 or younger and “later became adults; some married and had children who were born in the United States.”
“They are our neighbors, our friends, and loved ones, and this administration should view them as such and value their contribution to the nation,” the letter said. Terminating TPS will cause the individuals “trauma and hardship” if separated from their families, the letter said.
Leaders call conditions ‘harmful’ as U.S. government cites low risk
“The current conditions in El Salvador remain harmful for TPS holders who face a possible return to their country,” the leaders said.
El Salvador has remained in a state of emergency since March 2022. The declaration was “in response to its efforts to tame organized crime, suspending basic human rights protections,” the letter said.
While the letter noted that returning to the nation is unsafe due to mass incarceration, enforced disappearances, and dangerous environmental conditions, the U.S. State Department lists El Salvador under a Level 1 advisory — “exercise normal precautions — as of June 2026.
The designation is the lowest safety and security risk level in the U.S. Department of Stateʼs travel advisory system.
While the nation was once one of the most violent countries, a 2025 Congressional Research Service report said data from Salvadoran police authorities revealed a measurable reduction in homicides in the country since 2015.
From 2015 through 2024, the homicide rate declined by more than 98%, according to Salvadoran security officials. The Salvadoran government claimed its crackdown on gang activity reduced El Salvadorʼs homicide rate to 1.9 homicides per 100,000 people in 2024, down from 53.1 per 100,000 in 2018.
The U.S. Embassy in El Salvador noted that over the past few years “there has been a significant reduction in gang-related activity,” but there is still “violent crime” throughout the country.
A 2026 World Report by Human Rights Watch found that the state of emergency “remains in effect, suspending constitutional rights.”
“Authorities have committed widespread abuses, including mass arbitrary detention, enforced disappearance, torture and ill-treatment of detainees, and due process violations,” the report said.
While the violations continue, it did report that gang violence has “markedly declined.”
“Temporary Protected Status is exactly that — temporary,” according to DHS. “For too long, TPS has been allowed to function as a de facto amnesty program despite Congress never intending it to be permanent.”
Sign up for the EWTN News Email and Stay Connected
“If we have, in good faith, offered temporary protected status, we should not return people until we deemed it safe to go back,” Bishop Brendan Cahill said.
Facts Only
* Hundreds of faith leaders and organizations sent a letter to the Trump administration, Markwayne Mullin, and Marco Rubio requesting a review and extension of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for El Salvador before its expiration on September 9.
* The request was based on the assertion that conditions in El Salvador remain "unsafe" and that removal would be "detrimental" to communities.
* Letter signatories argued that returning Salvadoran TPS holders would endanger them due to the country's lack of capability to support nationals.
* Leaders requested an extension based on a review of current conditions, contributions to the U.S., and respect for the TPS statutory framework.
* The signatories shared a purpose in respecting human life, dignity, maintaining family units, and protecting those unable to safely return home due to conflict, disasters, or extraordinary conditions.
* About 20% of El Salvadoran TPS holders entered the U.S. when they were 16 or younger and later became adults; some subsequently married and had children in the U.S.
* Leaders stated that terminating TPS would cause individuals trauma and hardship if separated from their families.
* The leaders called the current conditions "harmful" for TPS holders facing a possible return to El Salvador.
* El Salvador has been in a state of emergency since March 2022, enacted in response to efforts to tame organized crime and suspend basic human rights protections.
* A 2026 World Report by Human Rights Watch found the state of emergency remains in effect, suspending constitutional rights.
* Reports from Salvadoran police authorities indicate a measurable reduction in homicides between 2015 and 2024.
Executive Summary
Faith leaders and organizations sent a letter to the Trump administration, Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin, and State Department Secretary Marco Rubio urging a review and extension of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for El Salvador before its expiration on September 9. The signatories argued that conditions in El Salvador remain unsafe and that removing individuals from the U.S. would be detrimental to communities. They asserted that sending Salvadoran TPS holders back to an unstable country lacking support is dangerous, and called for an extension based on a review of current conditions and the administration's obligation regarding TPS.
The signatories emphasized their shared purpose in respecting human life, dignity, and maintaining family units, advocating for protection for those unable to safely return home due to conflict or disaster. The letter noted that a significant portion of TPS holders entered the U.S. as minors and later became adults with families. Furthermore, leaders contended that terminating TPS would cause trauma and hardship for individuals separated from their families.
The signatories called the current conditions in El Salvador "harmful," noting that the country remains in a state of emergency since March 2022 due to efforts to control organized crime and suspend human rights protections. While the letter referenced concerns about unsafe return, it acknowledged that the U.S. State Department lists El Salvador under a Level 1 advisory, exercising normal precautions as of June 2026. The response also touched upon data regarding gang violence in El Salvador, noting a significant reduction since 2015, although human rights reports indicate ongoing abuses by authorities.
Full Take
The discourse surrounding TPS extension pivots on a fundamental tension between humanitarian obligation and geopolitical security assessment. The letter functions as an appeal leveraging moral weight—the principles of human dignity and family unity—against a purely risk-based governmental calculus. The pattern involves framing humanitarian concerns (safety, family separation) not as secondary appeals but as central pillars that should inform policy decisions concerning migration status.
A critical observation is the juxtaposition between the religious leaders’ assertion of harm and the government’s official safety assessments. The signatories point to documented state-sponsored abuses and ongoing instability, yet the State Department assigns a low risk level (Level 1 advisory). This discrepancy forces an examination of where accountability lies: in recognizing the lived reality of those under TPS or adhering strictly to formal diplomatic risk metrics.
The data on homicide reduction in El Salvador, while positive from a security standpoint, is countered by reports detailing systemic violations, enforced disappearances, and continued state emergency measures. The argument thus shifts from whether the country is currently safe to whether external powers have a moral obligation regarding those who reside there under temporary status. This suggests a pattern where humanitarian language seeks to occupy the space left open by quantitative security data, compelling actors to weigh ethical imperatives against strategic convenience.
What evidence supports the assumption that recognizing human suffering necessarily overrides established security protocols? What mechanisms exist for integrating systemic human rights violations into official risk assessments beyond reactive diplomatic advisories? If instability is acknowledged through reduced violence but persistent abuses, does the concept of "safety" itself need a broader definition to encompass internal justice alongside external threats?
Sentinel — Human
This text appears to be based on a genuine collection of stakeholder appeals layered onto existing public data regarding El Salvador's security situation, demonstrating typical advocacy journalism rather than purely synthetic generation.