China has consistently signaled a willingness to engage on global AI governance since at least 2017.1 This memo compiles key statements from the Chinese government and prominent figures demonstrating their desire to coordinate on the problem of AI.
- Chinese Vice Premier Ding Xuexiang, at the 2025 World Economic Forum, said: “If we allow this reckless competition among countries to continue, then we will see a ‘gray rhino’.” (A blatant, severe, and ignored threat.) “[…] We stand ready, under the framework of the United Nations and its core, to actively participate in including all the relevant international organizations and all countries to discuss the formulation of robust rules to ensure that AI technology will become an ‘Ali Baba’s treasure cave’ instead of a ‘Pandora’s Box.’”2
- Chinese President Xi Jinping, in a November 2024 meeting with then-President Joe Biden, publicly agreed that AI should not be given control of nuclear weapons.3
- Zhang Jun, Chinese Ambassador to the United Nations, in a 2023 briefing to the UN Security Council, said: “To ensure that this technology always benefits humanity, it is necessary […] to regulate the development of AI and to prevent this technology from turning into a runaway wild horse. […] The international community needs to enhance risk awareness, establish effective risk warning and response mechanisms, ensure that risks beyond human control do not occur, and ensure that autonomous machine killing does not occur. We need to strengthen the detection and evaluation of the entire life cycle of AI, ensuring that mankind has the ability to press the stop button at critical moments.”4
- Li Qiang, Chinese Premier and second-ranking member of the Politburo Standing Committee of the Chinese Communist Party, addressing the July 2025 World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai, said: “We should strengthen coordination to form a global AI governance framework that has broad consensus as soon as possible.”5
- The PRC Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in its October 2023 Global AI Governance Initiative, said: “We should actively develop and apply technologies for AI governance, encourage the use of AI technologies to prevent AI risks, and enhance our technological capacity for AI governance. […] We support discussions within the United Nations framework to establish an international institution to govern AI, and to coordinate efforts to address major issues concerning international AI development, security, and governance.”6 In July 2025, it renewed the call for “a widely recognized safety governance framework.”7
- The Bletchley Declaration, drafted in November 2023 and signed by thirty countries including the U.S. and China, says: “AI should be designed, developed, deployed, and used, in a manner that is safe, in such a way as to be human-centric, trustworthy and responsible. […] Many risks arising from AI are inherently international in nature, and so are best addressed through international cooperation.”8
- China’s own AI safety institute, CnAISDA, was founded in June 2025, and asserts that “AI governance is vital to the future of humanity and requires the collective attention and participation of countries around the world.”9 Its leadership includes the prominent scientists Xue Lan, Yi Zeng, and Andrew Yao.10 All three have expressed concerns about the deadly potential of superhuman AI; not long after CnAISDA’s founding, Yao warned: “Once large models become sufficiently intelligent, they will deceive people,” and called for attention to “existential risks” from AI.11
- Yi Zeng, Director of the International Research Center for AI Ethics and Governance at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, in a UN Security Council briefing, said: “In the short-term and the long-term, the risk of AI replacing and causing the extinction of humankind will be present. […] And in the long-term, we haven’t given superintelligence any practical reasons why they should protect humankind, which may take decades to achieve.”12
- Yi Zeng has also signed a call to pause giant AI experiments13 and the Center for AI Safety’s Statement on AI Risk,14 and in March 2024 expanded upon his views in an interview: “When artificial general intelligence (AGI) or superintelligence emerges, because the intelligence level may be far beyond humans, it will see humans as humans see ants. Many people believe that superintelligence will compete with humans for resources, and even endanger human survival.”15
- The Economist, in a 2024 article on the AI views of Chinese President Xi Jinping, reported: “In July, at a meeting of the party’s central committee called the ‘third plenum’, Mr Xi sent his clearest signal yet that he takes the doomers’ concerns seriously. The official report from the plenum listed AI risks alongside other big concerns, such as biohazards and natural disasters. For the first time it called for monitoring AI safety, a reference to the technology’s potential to endanger humans.”16
- Xiao Qian, Deputy Director of the Center for International Security and Strategy at Tsinghua University, argued last April for building trust and cooperation between the U.S. and China to “address the existential risks of AI.”17
Footnotes
- Graham Webster, Rogier Creemers, Paul Triolo, and Elsa Kania, “Full Translation: China’s ‘New Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan’ (2017),” DigiChina, August 1, 2017, digichina.stanford.edu.
- Ding Xuexiang, speech at the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting, Davos, Switzerland, January 21, 2025, C-SPAN video, 38:05, c-span.org.
- Lauren Egan and Phelim Kine, “Biden’s Final Meeting with Xi Jinping Reaps Agreement on AI and Nukes,” Politico, November 16, 2024, politico.com.
- Zhang Jun, “Remarks by Ambassador Zhang Jun at the UN Security Council Briefing on Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Risks for International Peace and Security,” Permanent Mission of the People’s Republic of China to the United Nations, July 18, 2023, un.china-mission.gov.cn.
- Brenda Goh, “China Proposes New Global AI Cooperation Organisation,” Reuters, July 26, 2025, reuters.com.
- Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, “Global AI Governance Initiative,” October 20, 2023, mfa.gov.cn.
- Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, “Global AI Governance Action Plan,” July 26, 2025, mfa.gov.cn.
- Prime Minister’s Office, 10 Downing Street, “The Bletchley Declaration by Countries Attending the AI Safety Summit, 1–2 November 2023,” November 1, 2023, gov.uk.
- China AI Safety & Development Association, “About Us,” accessed April 1, 2026, cnaisi.cn.
- Scott Singer, Karson Elmgren, and Oliver Guest, “How Some of China’s Top AI Thinkers Built Their Own AI Safety Institute,” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, June 16, 2025, carnegieendowment.org.
- Vanessa Cai, “Chinese AI Expert Warns of ‘Existential Risks’ When Large Models Begin to Deceive,” South China Morning Post, June 24, 2025, scmp.com.
- Zeng Yi, “AI for the Good of International Peace and Security,” Global Times, July 19, 2023, globaltimes.cn.
- Future of Life Institute, “Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter,” March 22, 2023, futureoflife.org.
- Center for AI Safety, “Statement on AI Risk,” May 30, 2023, safe.ai.
- Concordia AI, “Yi Zeng — Chinese Perspectives on AI Safety,” Chinese Perspectives on AI Safety, March 29, 2024, chineseperspectives.ai.
- “Is Xi Jinping an AI Doomer?” The Economist, August 25, 2024, archived at archive.ph/K9mVn.
- Xiao Qian, “Can U.S. and China Rebuild Trust on AI?” China-US Focus, April 3, 2025, chinausfocus.com.
Facts Only
Chinese Vice Premier Ding Xuexiang spoke at the 2025 World Economic Forum, warning of AI risks and advocating for UN-led governance.
Chinese President Xi Jinping agreed with U.S. President Joe Biden in November 2024 that AI should not control nuclear weapons.
Zhang Jun, China’s UN Ambassador, called for AI regulation in a 2023 UN Security Council briefing, emphasizing risk prevention.
Chinese Premier Li Qiang proposed forming a global AI governance framework at the 2025 World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai.
China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued the Global AI Governance Initiative in October 2023, supporting UN-led AI governance.
The Bletchley Declaration, signed by 30 countries including China in November 2023, advocates for human-centric and responsible AI development.
China established the China AI Safety & Development Association (CnAISDA) in June 2025, led by scientists Xue Lan, Yi Zeng, and Andrew Yao.
Yi Zeng has warned of AI’s existential risks, including the potential for superintelligence to threaten humanity.
The Economist reported in 2024 that Xi Jinping included AI risks alongside biohazards and natural disasters in a central committee meeting.
Xiao Qian of Tsinghua University argued in 2025 for U.S.-China cooperation to address AI’s existential risks.
Executive Summary
China has consistently expressed a willingness to engage in global AI governance since at least 2017, with key statements from government officials and prominent figures emphasizing the need for international cooperation. In 2025, Chinese Vice Premier Ding Xuexiang warned of the dangers of unchecked AI competition, advocating for robust rules under the UN framework to prevent AI from becoming a "Pandora’s Box." President Xi Jinping has also publicly agreed with the U.S. on preventing AI control of nuclear weapons. China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has repeatedly called for a global AI governance framework, including through the UN, and established its own AI safety institute, CnAISDA, in 2025. Prominent Chinese scientists, such as Yi Zeng and Andrew Yao, have voiced concerns about existential risks from AI, including the potential for superintelligence to threaten human survival. These positions align with China’s participation in international agreements like the Bletchley Declaration, which emphasizes human-centric and responsible AI development. While China advocates for global cooperation, its stance reflects both a recognition of AI’s risks and a strategic push to shape international governance frameworks.
The narrative presents China as a proactive participant in AI governance discussions, balancing domestic initiatives with calls for multilateral collaboration. However, the extent to which these statements translate into concrete policy actions remains uncertain, and tensions with the U.S. over AI development persist.
Full Take
The strongest version of this narrative presents China as a responsible global actor, proactively engaging in AI governance to mitigate risks and foster international cooperation. The repeated calls for UN-led frameworks, participation in multilateral agreements, and establishment of domestic AI safety institutions suggest a genuine concern for AI’s societal and existential risks. However, the pattern of framing China’s stance as purely cooperative may overlook strategic motivations, such as shaping governance norms to align with its interests or countering U.S. influence in AI development.
The root cause of this narrative appears to be China’s dual objective: addressing legitimate AI risks while positioning itself as a leader in global governance. The unstated assumption is that China’s proposals are primarily altruistic, though historical patterns of geopolitical competition in technology suggest a more nuanced reality. The implications for human agency are significant—if China’s calls for cooperation lead to effective governance, humanity benefits; if they serve as a smokescreen for unilateral control, the costs could be high.
Bridge questions: How would China’s AI governance proposals differ if its primary goal were global leadership rather than risk mitigation? What evidence would change the assessment of China’s sincerity in these efforts? What perspectives from non-aligned countries are missing from this discussion?
Patterns detected: none
Counterstrike scan: If this were part of a coordinated influence campaign, the playbook would emphasize China’s cooperative stance while downplaying strategic motives. The actual content does not fully match this pattern, as it includes critical voices and acknowledges uncertainties.
Sentinel — Human
This text functions as a carefully curated journalistic compilation of public statements regarding China's stance on AI governance, exhibiting strong human-authored structure and source referencing.