- Published
Brendon McCullum has apologised for England's results under his leadership after he was sacked as Test coach on Sunday.
England have lost seven of their past nine Tests, 19 of their past 38, and have not won a five-match series against either Australia or India in McCullum's four years in charge.
The New Zealander will remain as head coach of England's white-ball teams and has a contract until the end of the 50-over World Cup in southern Africa in the autumn of 2027.
"It's a results business and, unfortunately, we weren't able to get the results we wanted and for that I'm sorry," McCullum told BBC Sport.
"India and Australia are the marquee series and if you don't win those you haven't quite been able to achieve what you wanted to. We achieved some good stuff over the four years but, fundamentally, the results didn't live up to it at the back end, hence the decision was made."
McCullum's exit is the latest twist in the unravelling of the England Test team. His sacking came two weeks after former captain Ben Stokes made a sudden announcement to retire from international cricket.
The collapse of the Bazball era began with a 4-1 Ashes defeat in Australia. In the aftermath, McCullum, Stokes and director of cricket Rob Key were allowed to keep their jobs.
But a 2-1 series defeat at home by New Zealand was the end firstly for Stokes, then McCullum. Key remains in his post and has been given long-term backing by England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) chief executive Richard Gould.
"Australia, we didn't get the outcome we wanted there," said former New Zealand captain McCullum.
"Afterwards I thought we made some nice change, some good evolution, and tried to implement a few other different tactics and tweaks to the environment.
"We obviously got beat by a good New Zealand side and that heaps more pressure on the results. At some stage, someone has to be responsible for that. I'll put my hand up and will wear that."
From the ride to the rubble - how McCullum lost England Test job
- Published1 day ago
England want new coach before Pakistan - who could it be?
- Published1 day ago
The latter stages of McCullum's tenure have been blighted by off-field issues. During the winter, Harry Brook, Jacob Bethell, Josh Tongue and Ben Duckett were all involved in late-night incidents.
After England won the first Test of the summer against New Zealand, the series was derailed by Stokes and Gus Atkinson breaking the team's midnight curfew and being present when a member of security staff was struck by a Saracens rugby player.
And McCullum accepted responsibility for what happened on and off the field.
"I was the leader of that group. I was in charge of the team culturally, in charge of the team tactically, in charge of the team results wise as well," said McCullum.
"If you don't get the results, being a results business, fundamentally you get replaced. I'm not unaccustomed to that, I've been around this game for 20-odd years and I know if you aren't getting the results, someone else needs an opportunity.
"I put my hand up for that and accept it wasn't good enough."
McCullum and Stokes have both previously denied they grew apart during the Ashes series, and McCullum said he has heard from the all-rounder since news of his departure from the Test role emerged.
"I got some nice messages from Stokesy," said McCullum. "I guess, in a romantic kind of way there's something about Stokesy and I going out together. We started it together and we go out together, and I have no problem with that."
England's search for a new Test coach is already under way, and Gould explained on Sunday a coach will be appointed before a new captain is finalised.
Gould also suggested that the captaincy would be split, perhaps hinting that white-ball captain Brook, also the Test vice-captain, would not be able to lead across all formats.
Brook and McCullum have formed a strong bond while working together with the white-ball teams, and England's T20 side have just moved to the top of the world rankings.
It raises the question as to whether that partnership will be broken up if 27-year-old Brook takes control of the Test side.
"You know my thoughts on Harry, my affection for him as a player, person and leader," said McCullum.
"He's got one of the best tactical brains I've seen in someone so relatively young. He's developing at an incredible speed as a leader. I love working with Harry and I'd love to continue to do so.
"There will be lots of robust conversations throughout. Myself with the white-ball and whoever takes over the red-ball, ultimately there's going to be harmony across all three teams because we're going to want what's best for English cricket."
McCullum previously had experience working in an environment where the coaching responsibilities were split. For two years, he was Test coach, with Matthew Mott in charge of the white-ball teams. When Mott was sacked in 2024, McCullum assumed overall control.
A heavily congested schedule lends itself to splitting the coaching jobs, but can also lead to one team being sidelined in terms of access to multi-format players.
McCullum will now have to build a working relationship with the new Test coach.
Former England coach Andy Flower could be a candidate, while McCullum's former New Zealand team-mate Stephen Fleming is highly respected and has just left Indian Premier League side Chennai Super Kings.
Ex-England batter Jonathan Trott has international experience with Afghanistan and Glamorgan coach Richard Dawson is seen as an emerging homegrown contender.
"Once the Test coach is put in the post, we'll work collaboratively to try to work out what is right for all three formats, and what is right for English cricket," said McCullum.
"I expect that to be robust, but hopefully a profitable conversation for everyone. Fundamentally, we just need to get what's right for English cricket. That will be the number one motivation."
England, under McCullum, begin a three-match one-day series against India at Edgbaston on Tuesday.
Jos Buttler will play his 200th ODI for England, while the tourists can call on the likes of Virat Kohli, Rohit Sharma and Jasprit Bumrah.
England v India, first ODI
14 June, 11:00 BST
Ball-by-ball commentary on BBC Radio 5 Sports Extra, BBC Sounds and the BBC Sport website and app. Follow live text updates and in-play video clips on the website and app. Highlights on BBC Two and BBC iPlayer from 23:05 BST.
Related topics
- Published8 June
Facts Only
Brendon McCullum was sacked as England's Test coach on Sunday.
England lost seven of their last nine Tests and 19 of their last 38 Tests during McCullum's four-year tenure.
England did not win a five-match series against Australia or India during this period.
McCullum remains the head coach of England's white-ball teams with a contract lasting until the 2027 World Cup.
Ben Stokes retired from international cricket two weeks prior to McCullum's sacking.
England lost a series 4-1 in Australia and 2-1 at home to New Zealand.
Rob Key remains the director of cricket.
Harry Brook, Jacob Bethell, Josh Tongue, and Ben Duckett were involved in late-night incidents during the winter.
Stokes and Gus Atkinson broke a team midnight curfew during a series against New Zealand.
ECB chief executive Richard Gould stated a new coach will be appointed before a new captain is finalized.
England begins a three-match one-day series against India at Edgbaston on Tuesday.
Executive Summary
Brendon McCullum has stepped down as England's Test coach following a period of diminishing returns and systemic instability. The tenure was marked by a failure to secure series wins against top-tier opponents India and Australia, culminating in a home series loss to New Zealand. This sporting decline coincided with significant leadership turnover, including the sudden retirement of captain Ben Stokes, and a series of off-field disciplinary issues involving several key players.
While the "Bazball" era in Test cricket has ended, McCullum retains his role as white-ball head coach, overseeing a T20 side currently ranked first in the world. The England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) is now seeking a new Test coach, with candidates such as Andy Flower, Stephen Fleming, Jonathan Trott, and Richard Dawson mentioned as possibilities. There is an ongoing strategic discussion regarding whether to split the captaincy across formats, potentially involving Harry Brook, to ensure stability and specialized leadership across red and white-ball cricket.
Full Take
The narrative presents the strongest possible version of the "results-driven" professional sports model: leadership is an interchangeable component that must be replaced when the output (wins) fails to justify the process (Bazball). McCullum’s public acceptance of responsibility serves as a professional closure, framing the sacking not as a failure of philosophy, but as a failure of execution.
The underlying pattern is one of cultural volatility. The transition from the aggressive innovation of Bazball to "rubble" suggests a gap between tactical brilliance and sustainable discipline. The mention of repeated curfew breaks and late-night incidents indicates that the freedom afforded by the tactical revolution may have eroded the structural boundaries necessary for long-term stability. There is a tension here between the success of the white-ball team and the collapse of the Test side, suggesting that the same "disruptor" energy that works in shorter formats can become a liability in the endurance-based environment of Test cricket.
The root cause is the pursuit of a brand—Bazball—that prioritized aesthetic and aggressive play over the traditional metrics of consistency. The second-order consequence is a potential identity crisis for the team as they transition to a new coach and captain.
Patterns detected: none
If this were a coordinated influence campaign, it would likely overemphasize the "chaos" of the dressing room to delegitimize the Bazball philosophy entirely, using the off-field scandals to argue that "innovation" is a mask for "lack of discipline." The current account does not match this; it balances the failures with acknowledged successes in the white-ball arena.
Bridge Questions:
1. To what extent did the "Bazball" brand create a psychological environment where discipline was viewed as secondary to aggression?
2. Does splitting the captaincy by format strengthen specialization or weaken the overall cultural cohesion of the national squad?
3. If the white-ball team remains successful under McCullum, does that validate his methods or suggest that the Test failure was purely a matter of format-specific limitations?