Skip to content
Chimera readability score 0.5864 out of 100, reading level.

Bank of America has agreed to pay victims of notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein $72.5 million to settle a class action lawsuit alleging that the bank facilitated his sex trafficking operation, a New York federal court filing showed Friday evening.
The settlement, in which BoA did not admit wrongdoing, is the fourth settlement by a major bank of legal claims by Epstein victims or a government entity alleging they effectively abetted his trafficking while he was a customer. The settlement with BoA must be approved by U.S. District Court in Manhattan Judge Jed Rakoff; such approval is typically granted.
The settlement would pay "all women who were sexually abused or trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein, or by any person who is connected to or otherwise associated with Jeffrey Epstein or any Jeffrey Epstein sex-trafficking venture, between June 30, 2008 and July 6, 2019, inclusive," according to the filing.
Lawyers in the case are "aware that there are at least 60 women who were victimized by Epstein between" those dates, the filing said.
A Bank of America spokesman, in a statement, said, "While we stand by our prior statements made in the filings in this case, including that Bank of America did not facilitate sex trafficking crimes, this resolution allows us to put this matter behind us and provides further closure for the plaintiffs."
CNBC has requested comment from the two law firms that represented the victims in the suit filed in October 2025, Boies Schiller Flexner and Edwards Henderson.
Prior bank settlements
JPMorgan Chase in June 2023 agreed to pay victims of Epstein $290 million to settle a similar lawsuit. The settlement came a month after Deutsche Bank agreed to pay victims $75 million.
JPMorgan in August 2023 separately agreed to pay the government of the U.S. Virgin Islands $75 million, alleging the bank facilitated and benefited from the sex trafficking of young women by Epstein, who owned a private island in the USVI.
Like BoA, JPMorgan did not admit wrongdoing in its settlements.
Deutsche Bank, however, at the time of its settlement, said, "We acknowledge our error onboarding Epstein in 2013, and the weaknesses in our processes, and have learnt from our mistakes and our shortcomings."
Those three prior lawsuits, like the current one against BoA, were filed in Manhattan federal court.
What the lawsuit alleged
The lead plaintiff in the Bank of America case, who filed under the pseudonym Jane Doe, is a native of Russia who met Epstein in 2011.
The complaint against BoA said that from that year, through 2019, "Epstein sexually abused Jane Doe on at least 100 occasions, including but not limited to, forcibly touching her, forcibly raping her, and forcing her to engage in sexual acts with other women for his own depraved sexual gratification."
The suit says that in May 2013, Jane Doe opened a bank account at Bank of America at the direction of Epstein's accountant, Richard Kahn and an immigration attorney as part of a plan to defraud immigration officials.
The lawsuit said a "recent investigation into Epstein's crimes has revealed that billionaire Wall Street financier Leon Black paid Epstein including $170 million for purported 'tax and estate planning advice' from his Bank of America account."
Black in 2023 agreed to pay the U.S. Virgin Islands $62.5 million, and in return, that government released him from any potential legal claims related to Epstein.
"At the heart of the Amended Complaint, Lead Plaintiff alleges that Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking venture was facilitated and enabled by [Bank of America] helping Epstein avoid regulators' scrutiny and providing Epstein with withdrawal and wire services, all so Defendant could profit from Epstein and his associates," the filing about the settlement says.
"Lead Plaintiff further alleges that Defendant's assistance to Epstein's sex trafficking enterprise prevented the authorities from discovering his illegal scheme and increased the size and scale of Epstein's access to and control of victims, causing damage to members of the Class," the filing said.
The bank "has expressly denied, and continues to deny, that it participated in or otherwise assisted, supported, or facilitated the Epstein sex-trafficking venture in any way or that it engaged in obstruction."
Epstein, 66, killed himself in a federal jail in Manhattan in August 2019, weeks after being arrested on child sex trafficking charges.
He previously had pleaded guilty to soliciting an underage girl for prostitution in Florida state court in 2008, and ended up serving 13 months in jail.

Facts Only

Actor: Bank of America, Jeffrey Epstein, Jane Doe (lead plaintiff)
Event: Settlement of a class-action lawsuit alleging bank facilitated sex trafficking
Timeline: June 30, 2008 to July 6, 2019
Location: Not specified in the article

Executive Summary

Bank of America has reached a $72.5 million settlement with victims of Jeffrey Epstein in a class-action lawsuit, alleging that the bank facilitated his sex trafficking operation between June 30, 2008 and July 6, 2019. The settlement is subject to approval by a U.S. District Court judge, and would compensate all women who were sexually abused or trafficked by Epstein during this period. The lead plaintiff in the case, Jane Doe, claims that Epstein sexually abused her on at least 100 occasions from 2011 to 2019, and that Bank of America helped him avoid regulatory scrutiny and provided withdrawal and wire services, thereby facilitating his trafficking operation. This settlement is the fourth such settlement by a major bank over claims related to Epstein's trafficking activities, with JPMorgan Chase and Deutsche Bank previously reaching settlements in 2023 and 2025, respectively.

Full Take

This settlement further implicates Bank of America in the wide-ranging scandal surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operation. The fact that this is the fourth such settlement by a major bank raises questions about the banking industry's complicity in these crimes and their willingness to profit from relationships with high-profile, yet questionable clients. Furthermore, the continued denial of wrongdoing by the banks involved highlights the need for increased regulation and transparency within the financial sector.
Patterns detected: ARC-0024 Ambiguity (the settlement does not admit wrongdoing), ARC-0043 Motte-and-Bailey (the banks deny participation in Epstein's sex trafficking but also settle the lawsuits).

Sentinel — Human

Confidence

This text appears to be written by a human journalist. The content is balanced, has a personal touch, and does not exhibit any signs of being machine-generated or AI-assisted.

Signals Detected
low severity: Variable sentence length
low severity: Balanced, but with a clear narrative and emotional impact
low severity: No matching argumentative skeleton or talking points with known templates
none severity: No significant fabrications or inconsistencies found
Human Indicators
Article contains personal voice, emotional impact, and a clear narrative
The use of quotes adds credibility to the claims made in the article