Skip to content
Chimera readability score 0.5268 out of 100, reading level.

As the ETF industry witnessed expansive growth during the past decade, providers have been engaging in a fee war as competition heats up. Industry giants like Vanguard and BlackRock have slashed expense ratios to near-zero, but that era of fee compression could be reaching an inflection point. TMX VettaFi caught up with Alex Morris, CEO of F/m Investments, at the Exchange 2026 conference to get his thoughts on the current state of the industry. The discussion focused on active ETFs, rising fees, and dual share classes.
Pay to Play in ETFs
While record flows continue to pour into the cheapest products, the average fee of a new ETF launch is actually rising. Ernst & Young (EY) recently published data showing that active ETFs have seen greater proliferation in the industry, but at a cost—literally. As EY data noted, active ETFs are typically 25 basis points higher so, in effect, the influx of actively managed funds is pushing average fees higher.
“Record flows into the cheapest ETFs in the last three years—S&P, all the Vanguard products—yet despite that, fees are going back up,” Morris explained, noting that along with active ETFs, complex single-stock strategies and derivative-income products are helping to push fees higher. “The average fund coming out today is more expensive than the fund that was two years ago, and it will continue to get more expensive.”
However, as Morris explained, this is “secretly good news” for the industry. New market entrants won’t have to play the low-fee game, which could stifle innovation coming from small, independent firms that simply cannot afford to exist.
“You just can’t afford to run a business at six basis points. Not with independent trustees, TA, accounting, tax, audit… it’s just too expensive,” confirmed Morris.
Morris noted that while mutual funds often settle between the 75–90 basis point range, active ETFs are finding a “sweet spot” in the 40s, 50s, and 60s.
“If you want good quality alpha, you do have to pay something for it,” Morris added. “If it comes for free, then everyone will just get the same plain vanilla, silly product that doesn’t work.”
Dual Share Classes for the Win
F/m Investments launched the first dual share class structure, allowing investors to access its F/m US TBIL 3-Month Treasury Fund through either an ETF or mutual fund wrapper within the same portfolio, marking a shift in how advisors can deploy strategies across client accounts.
The Exchange 2026 conference took place just before the launch of Dimensional’s first actively managed ETF share class. However, the buzz on dual share class funds was already circulating throughout the conference.
Morris noted that the structure would inevitably “save the mutual fund.” Firms who have already built a client base from their mutual fund products will allow them to transition to ETFs without triggering a taxable event.
“If you’re in a fund as a taxable investor in a mutual fund and it has short-term capital gains, those probably go away [in an ETF class],” Morris said. “That’s a big win for people.”
For more news, information, and strategy, visit ETF Trends.

Facts Only

Alex Morris, CEO of F/m Investments, discussed active ETFs, rising fees, and dual share classes at the Exchange 2026 conference
Average fee of a new ETF launch is increasing due to active ETFs, complex single-stock strategies, and derivative-income products
Active ETFs are typically 25 basis points higher than passive ETFs
F/m Investments launched the first dual share class structure for its F/m US TBIL 3-Month Treasury Fund
Dimensional is launching its first actively managed ETF share class

Executive Summary

The ETF industry is experiencing a shift in the competitive landscape as providers grapple with fee compression. While cheap products continue to attract record flows, the average fee of new ETF launches is increasing due to the proliferation of active ETFs and complex single-stock strategies. This trend could be beneficial for smaller, independent firms who may struggle to compete in a low-fee market. F/m Investments, for instance, launched the first dual share class structure for its F/m US TBIL 3-Month Treasury Fund, allowing investors to access the fund through either an ETF or mutual fund wrapper within the same portfolio. This shift could potentially save the mutual fund industry. The rise in fees and the introduction of dual share classes are major trends shaping the ETF market.

Full Take

Steelman: The article presents a balanced perspective on the rising fees in the ETF industry, highlighting the proliferation of active ETFs as a contributing factor. It also discusses the introduction of dual share classes as a potential solution to save the mutual fund industry.
Patterns detected: none
Root Cause: The rise in fees can be attributed to increased competition and the growing popularity of actively managed ETFs. The introduction of dual share classes is a response to this trend, aimed at providing more flexibility for advisors and investors.
Implications: This shift could impact investment strategies and cost structures for both ETF providers and investors. It also raises questions about transparency and potential conflicts of interest in the dual share class structure.
Bridge Questions: How will the rise in fees affect different segments of the ETF market? What are the long-term implications of dual share classes on investment strategies and cost structures? How can investors ensure they are making informed decisions in this evolving landscape?

Sentinel — Human

Confidence

The analysis suggests that the article is likely human-written, as it demonstrates varied sentence length variance, presents a clear argument, cites specific sources, and does not contain fabrications or historical inaccuracies.

Signals Detected
low severity: Sentence length variance is varied, indicating human writing.
medium severity: The text presents a clear argument and perspective, which is not characteristic of AI-generated content.
low severity: The article cites specific sources (Ernst & Young) and provides quotes attributed to a named individual (Alex Morris), reducing the likelihood of coordinated synthetic production.
none severity: No clear fabrications or historical inaccuracies are present.
Human Indicators
The article provides a human perspective on the ETF industry, including quotes from Alex Morris and specific data from Ernst & Young.