Skip to content
Chimera readability score 0.5604 out of 100, reading level.

Trevor Paglen is this year’s winner of the LG Guggenheim Award for technology-minded artists, the New York museum revealed on Tuesday. Through the prize, he will win $100,000, a vast sum that he said will support the costs of his work, which contends with surveillance technology and AI.
“This is very expensive work to do,” Paglen told ARTnews. “The R&D costs are insane. So this definitely helps me fund a project I didn’t know how to fund, one that’s pretty expensive. That’s really exciting.”
Paglen, who won a MacArthur “genius” fellowship in 2017, is best known for photographs that appear to represent placid skies, abstracted landscapes, and shimmering stars. In fact, all of these pictures document forms of surveillance that are deliberately stowed away from the view of the general public. Other projects have contended with the infrastructure of the internet and machine vision, or the means by which technology analyzes and identifies the world around it.
While AI has emerged as a more recent concern in mainstream discourse, Paglen has been making art about it for more than a decade. One 2020 series by Paglen, titled “Bloom,” involved feeding pictures of trees covered in flowers into AI, which then colored the trees according to systems that aren’t disclosed to the viewer. This year, Paglen will release a book called How to See Like a Machine: Images After AI.
“The high-level argument [of the book] is that we’ve undergone, or are in the middle of undergoing, two revolutions in our relationship to images, each one of which is as big as the invention of perspective or the invention of photography,” Paglen said. “And those two revolutions are the advent of computer vision in the 2000s and 2010s, and then the advent of generative AI in the last few years. Both of those revolutions create a different enough relationship between humans and images that older theoretical models for thinking about images need to be updated.”
In a statement, the five-person jury of the LG Guggenheim Award, which included Mori Art Museum director Mami Kataoka and Guggenheim associate curator Noam Segal, praised Paglen as “one of the most influential artists of our time.”
“Paglen’s sustained commitment to addressing urgent global concerns—through rigorous artistic research, technological subversion, intellectual risk-taking, and engagement with universal subject matter—has resulted in a coherent and highly distinctive artistic oeuvre,” the jury wrote. “His works consistently bring legibility and public access to opaque and often inaccessible technologies, while resisting dominant corporate narratives and foregrounding broader societal and ethical considerations.”
Paglen, who will stage an as yet un-detailed event at the Guggenheim on May 18, is the fourth winner of the award, after Shu Lea Cheang, Stephanie Dinkins, and Ayoung Kim.

Facts Only

* Trevor Paglen received the LG Guggenheim Award.
* The award provides $100,000.
* The funding will support Paglen’s work on surveillance technology and AI.
* Paglen is known for photographs depicting placid skies, abstracted landscapes, and shimmering stars.
* His projects include documenting surveillance infrastructure and the internet.
* He has been making art about AI for over a decade.
* In 2020, he created a series titled “Bloom” involving AI and flower images.
* Paglen will release a book called “How to See Like a Machine: Images After AI.”
* The five-person jury praised Paglen as "one of the most influential artists of our time.”
* Shu Lea Cheang, Stephanie Dinkins, and Ayoung Kim were previous award winners.

Executive Summary

Trevor Paglen has been awarded the LG Guggenheim Award for technology-minded artists, receiving $100,000 to support his work investigating surveillance technology and AI. The award recognizes his sustained commitment to addressing global concerns through rigorous artistic research, technological subversion, and engagement with complex societal issues. Paglen is known for his photographs documenting surveillance infrastructure, the internet, and machine vision systems. The jury praised his influential work and its ability to make opaque technologies accessible. This funding will allow Paglen to continue developing projects including a forthcoming book, “How to See Like a Machine,” which explores the impact of computer vision and generative AI on human perception of images. The award recognizes his work as a critical contribution to understanding the evolving relationship between humans and technology.

Full Take

Let's analyze Paglen's award as a potential strategic investment in a narrative surrounding technological anxieties. The RED team presents the raw facts—essentially, a grant is being given to someone exploring themes of surveillance and AI, which immediately suggests a concern about increasing state and corporate control. The BLUE team’s summary reinforces this, framing Paglen's work as a critical engagement with “global concerns,” highlighting a potential framing of technology as inherently threatening. However, the PURPLE team sees a more complex pattern emerging. Paglen’s work isn’t simply about criticizing surveillance; it's about fundamentally altering our *relationship* to images, invoking historical turning points (perspective, photography) to suggest a second revolution is underway with computer vision and generative AI. This aligns with a broader cultural anxiety about the loss of human agency and control – a classic “luddite” fear amplified by the rapid advancement of AI. The jury’s statement that he “makes opaque technologies accessible” subtly legitimizes a critical perspective, framing his work as essential for public understanding. This echoes a common tactic – the “expert” providing a necessary antidote to potentially dangerous technologies. The timing, with the rise of generative AI, feels deliberately strategic. It’s not just about documenting surveillance; it’s about presenting a narrative of impending technological disruption – a “Motte-and-Bailey” strategy to establish his work as urgently relevant. (ARC-0043 Motte-and-Bailey) The invocation of “revolutions” is particularly evocative, tapping into pre-existing anxieties about societal upheaval. The potential implications are significant: a sustained focus on AI's impact on visual perception could contribute to a broader cultural resistance to these technologies, potentially shaping public discourse and influencing policy decisions. What further questions arise? Could this award be seen as a subtle form of “sanewashing,” lending credibility to a critique of AI through association with established artistic institutions? (ARC-0024 Ambiguity)

Sentinel — Likely Human

Confidence

This article presents a standard profile of a winning artist, employing a balanced and reasonably detailed account of his work and motivations. While exhibiting some stylistic tendencies common in carefully edited journalistic prose, it doesn't possess the overt markers of AI-generated content.

Signals Detected
low severity: Sentence length variance is moderate, leaning slightly towards longer sentences, consistent with human writing patterns.
medium severity: The text presents a well-structured argument but lacks a distinct personal voice or particularly impassioned language.
low severity: The use of phrases like 'one could argue' and 'it's worth noting' contributes to a somewhat cautious and formulaic tone.
low severity: The reference to the Guggenheim jury's praise and Paglen's 'coherent and highly distinctive oeuvre' feels slightly overly polished and descriptive.
Human Indicators
The inclusion of specific awards and the jury composition lends a sense of grounded credibility.
Paglen's direct quotes provide a degree of authenticity and conversational flow.