All this week, the Eater Today newsletter is dedicated to editor Hot Takes, a way to release the pressure valve of crankiness that comes with sweating your way through the end of summer. This story was previously published as part of that series. Subscribe to Eater Today to see more of our editors’ boldest opinions about dining culture writ large.
I’m Over the Erewhonification of Fancy Grocery Stores
The rise of “luxury” grocery stores feels deeply sinister
If you buy something from a link, Vox Media may earn a commission. See our ethics statement.
There was a time, long before we’d ever conceived of the phrase “shoppy shop,” when I loved nothing more than going to a specialty grocery store. “Bougie grocery store” was a phrase I said with love and not an ounce of judgment. I loved the delightfully corny graphic design of the products on shelves at little chef-beloved markets, the rare locations where one could reliably find locally made, small-batch, niche products that weren’t yet available elsewhere.
I went to Eataly when bored, trusting that I’d find something new there to drum up some impulses of desire and inspiration; even if I didn’t buy anything, I could be shaken from the doldrums of daily life by picking up a small piece of obscure cheese, a jar of something I’d never seen in a jar before, or a fancy bag of chips. I loved the curiosity these shelves inspired; they felt like capsules of the world. Here were products I’d never seen at the regular grocery store and which transported me into a vision of a different self — one more learned, more cultured even without traveling, more artistic simply by virtue of having an interesting ingredient to play with.
Something has happened. Today, I enter fancy grocery stores — a category that now seems larger and easier to find than ever — and, often, I feel something closer to disdain, sometimes even going as far as legitimate disgust. In the place of earnest specialty shops with heart and character (and lovingly ugly Comic Sans labels) is a slew of ripoff Erewhons: sleek, streamlined, and moneyed. What I take issue with is less the “shoppy shops” than the “luxury grocers.” They sell premade food and precut vegetables at prices that have prompted me to audibly gasp. Their shelves are a tasteslopped barrage of buzzword-y products like “microplastic-free salt” and tallow-fried tortilla chips.
The fancy grocery stores in whose aisles I’ve found respite in the past felt like places for food lovers, where burly, bearded cheesemongers sang the praises of ultra-funky washed-rinds as though they didn’t smell like actual feet. What I see on these postmodern shelves, though, is food less driven by curiosity and creativity than by fear. Fancy grocery stores have become a nexus for laundering conservative ideology under the compelling guise of pantry goods that are nice to look at. Sourcing, here, seems to matter more for the granularity of what a product does not include (i.e., seed oils), rather than any real investment in agriculture or farmers or local economies; the value of the small farm becomes the fact that it’s more likely to sell raw milk.
These grocery stores feel winnowed of passion and even self-involvement. They are places where a handful of Brussels sprouts, cut for you and placed into plastic, costs $17, for people who see food primarily as a form of “optimization,” social status, or table decor for a TikTok Day in My Life. I want food to feel fun, hedonistic, and pleasurable, not fraught and neurotic in the way these stores inspire. They feel like one-stop shops for orthorexia. Fancy grocery stores and I now feel like a couple who have been together forever but who inch further away from each other in the bed at night. Our lived experiences, future goals, and senses of self have diverged too much.
How else is a food lover supposed to feel when fancy grocery stores have become, primarily, places for people with means but not very much taste nor sense — that “microplastic-free” salt literally has plastic packaging — to flex their ludicrous levels of disposable income? The fancy grocery store today is a place for $32 ice and $45-per-pound tuna salad from a cold case.
Not to be dramatic, but I think there is some moral rot involved in normalizing this cultural shift, especially when many Americans are, simultaneously, simply buying fewer groceries because they can no longer afford to buy as much as they once did. Of course, as with buying a Birkin, the exclusivity is the point; we live in a world that has seen $250-a-jar, limited-edition celebrity honey, single-sourced from the gardens of Will Ferrell or Ai Weiwei.
The funny but also illuminating thing here is that the Erewhonification of fancy grocery stores comes at the same time as the democratization of Whole Foods. For so long and for so many people, the latter once represented the pinnacle of unnecessarily luxurious grocery store spending. While this shift is obviously a factor of the company’s new Amazon ownership (and certainly the quality of both the goods on offer and the overall shopping experience has suffered because of that), there is something jarring about the fact that the store once nicknamed “Whole Paycheck” now offers the cheapest everyday grocery option near me (in New York City) in multiple categories. The whole situation feels sinister, as though people with ample means needed a more exclusive option as a result of Whole Foods having become “too accessible.”
I do not hate Erewhon. For that matter, I have found myself transfixed in its aisles, wondering how water could become $12, and inevitably fantasizing about the dewy, optimized, supplemented self that might be brought about by developing an Erewon-enabled kelp noodle and cold-pressed juice habit. I think fondly of the vacation I took to Los Angeles, when, slurping a Hailey Bieber smoothie and feeling entranced by its hyper-concentrated strawberry flavor, I remarked to my husband, “I don’t know, maybe $21 for a smoothie isn’t that ridiculous, when that’s just what cocktails cost, and those are bad for you.”
I understand the lure, but I also want to resist its ubiquity. Let Erewhon be Erewhon. Can’t everywhere else just be normal?
Facts Only
* The author describes a past appreciation for specialty grocery stores characterized by the availability of locally made, small-batch, niche products.
* The author experienced inspiration from novelty in specialty stores, such as finding obscure cheeses or unique items.
* The current experience with "fancy grocery stores," specifically Erewhon, elicits feelings of disdain and disgust.
* These stores offer premade foods and precut vegetables at high prices.
* Current products involve buzzwords like “microplastic-free salt” and tallow-fried chips.
* Past specialty shops fostered curiosity; current stores seem driven by fear.
* The author notes that sourcing appears focused on exclusions, such as avoiding seed oils, rather than investment in agriculture or local economies.
* Grocery stores are perceived as places for "optimization," social status, or aesthetic display (e.g., TikTok).
* The author observes a divergence between the food lover's desire for pleasure and the neurotic nature inspired by these stores.
* The juxtaposition of Erewhonification with Whole Foods suggests that increased accessibility has led to a shift in desired exclusivity.
Executive Summary
The author reflects on a shift in the experience of specialty grocery shopping, moving from a time of genuine curiosity and inspiration to a present feeling of disdain for what they term "luxury" grocery stores like Erewhon. The author contrasts the past experience—finding unique, niche products that sparked desire—with the current environment, which is characterized by streamlined aesthetics and high prices. This change prompts an analysis that the current model prioritizes fear and optimization over creativity and pleasure in food selection.
The narrative further explores the perceived cultural shift, suggesting that these stores act as a nexus for laundering conservative ideology under the guise of consumable goods. The author observes that the focus on sourcing now seems to concern what is excluded (like seed oils) rather than genuine investment in agriculture or local economies. Ultimately, there is a tension between the allure of highly curated, expensive food experiences and a desire for food to be fundamentally hedonistic and pleasurable, leading to a sense of emotional divergence between the consumer and the retail environment.
Full Take
The narrative traces a movement from an experiential, curious relationship with food retail to a transactional, fear-based one, suggesting a profound loss of agency for the consumer within the food culture. The central pattern involves the commodification of aesthetic and moral concerns—where concepts like "luxury" are enforced through packaging and pricing, turning culinary exploration into a neurotic exercise in self-optimization. This mirrors a larger societal shift where consumption is channeled not by desire but by anxiety about unseen impurities, feeding into a system that values calculated exclusion over authentic pleasure.
The juxtaposition of the Erewhon experience with the democratization of Whole Foods reveals a paradoxical tension: increased accessibility has resulted in a new form of exclusionary luxury, where the cost of being "less optimized" or "less fearful" is extremely high. The fascination with expensive, hyper-specific foods (like $21 smoothies) serves as an ironic counterpoint to the critique of neurosis, suggesting that the pursuit of hyper-optimized living itself has become the new, absurd benchmark for status. This framework implies a systemic pressure where meaning is derived from consumption management rather than genuine connection to the source or the experience.
The core implication is how societal structures—specifically those governing wealth and status—reframe basic needs like food into moral and aesthetic performance metrics. The resistance expressed ("Let Erewhon be Erewhon") signals an attempt to reclaim sensory pleasure from ideological enforcement, asking whether the pursuit of hyper-curated perfection ultimately detracts from lived enjoyment or simply reinforces a gilded cage built on manufactured anxiety.
Bridge Questions: If the goal is genuine hedonism, what alternative frameworks for valuing food outside of status signaling exist? How can the cultural discourse shift from quantifying dietary "purity" to valuing ecological and social stewardship in consumer choice? What does the desire to resist ubiquity imply about the nature of true freedom in a hyper-commercialized environment?
Sentinel — Human
The text is a highly subjective essay blending personal nostalgia with sharp cultural critique regarding the commodification of luxury food retail, exhibiting strong human narrative style.
