Kris DeVault’s toddler has a rare genetic disease. He’s desperate to try an experimental drug, even though it has not been through clinical trials.
Kris DeVault is desperate.
His son, Brody, was born in March 2023. It wasn’t long before he started to show signs of developmental delay, says DeVault. As time went on, Brody started missing key milestones in speech, movement, and coordination, he says.
When Brody was around two and a half years old, a genetic test revealed creatine transporter deficiency—a rare condition in which the brain and muscles lack the energy they need to develop.
There are no cures for Brody’s condition. But DeVault has learned of a company developing a drug that might help. That drug is still in the early stages of development and has only been tested in animals and a small number of healthy adults. Doctors can’t prescribe it.
DeVault knows the drug might not work. But he’s doing all he can to access it regardless. And a new law in Montana could make it easier for people in his position to get access to treatments—at least in theory.
Today, Brody is three years old. His dad describes him as a happy, curious, and loving little boy who wants to learn. But Brody struggles to communicate. “He’s got no words, really,” says DeVault. “He wants to communicate more than he’s able to … which then turns into frustration.”
It’s difficult for Brody to tell his parents whether he’s hot, cold, hungry, thirsty, uncomfortable, or even in pain, says DeVault. He recently found Brody standing on an anthill in the backyard, being bitten by red ants. “These fire ants were just going to town on his feet … and he was just looking,” he says.
Brody has muscle weakness too. “He can’t move very fast, he doesn’t have a ton of strength … and it takes a lot of energy for him to walk balanced,” says DeVault. “His arms are skinnier than [those of] his nine-month-old sister.”
It’s concerning, but DeVault is most worried about Brody’s neurological development. Toddlers’ brains are exceptionally “plastic”—the first years of a child’s life are thought to be crucial for long-term brain development.
A biotechnology company in France is working on a drug to help people like Brody. Creatine usually provides brain cells with energy. People with creatine transporter deficiency (CTD) can’t get creatine into the brain.
The team at Ceres Brain Therapeutics is developing a treatment designed to bypass this issue and effectively deliver creatine directly to the brain. So far, the team has seen promising results in mice, says Ceres CEO Thomas Joudinaud.
The company also recently completed a phase I clinical trial that involved testing various doses of the drug, which is delivered as a nasal spray, in 48 healthy adult volunteers. That trial has not yet been published, says Joudinaud. The drug has not been tested in people with CTD, or in children.
“I look at this, and I’m like, that is my one shot for Brody,” says DeVault.
Joudinaud is planning a phase II trial in people with CTD, as well as others with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. But that trial will take place in France, and it’s unlikely that Brody will be able to take part, says DeVault.
Ceres can’t make the drug available to Brody under an expanded access scheme run by the US Food and Drug Administration either, because the drug has not been registered with the FDA, and because it is currently manufactured in a way that does not comply with FDA regulations, says Joudinaud.
Even if that phase II trial is successful, and if the drug is ultimately approved, it is unlikely to reach the US market for at least a few years. DeVault is worried that will be too late for Brody—he’ll be “past his plasticity window” by then, he says.
Now, with the adoption of a new law in Montana, he theoretically has another option. Montana has had a “right to try” law—which allows terminally ill people to apply for access to unapproved drugs—in place since 2015. In 2023, a new law technically expanded this option to people who were not terminally ill, providing the drugs have been through preliminary phase I clinical trials. A second law aimed to clarify how clinics could sell and administer those treatments to patients. And last weekend, the state’s department of Health and Human Services finalized a set of rules for those clinics.
An experimental treatment review board (ETRB) has been established to review applications for access to experimental, unproven, and unapproved drugs. And it is set to review its first two applications in the coming weeks.
Ceres could also apply to Montana’s ETRB to sell its experimental treatment to Brody’s parents via a clinic in the state. But Joudinaud is reluctant, at least for the time being. While he thinks that Montana’s setup is “very interesting and very pragmatic” and “suitable for our drug,” he’s worried about getting on the wrong side of the FDA.
DeVault has been pleading with FDA staffers for a written statement essentially promising that biotech companies participating in Montana’s program won’t be penalized later on, especially when they eventually try to get their drugs approved in the US. But he hasn’t made any progress.
Now he’s looking beyond Montana. He’s considering accessing treatment in Próspera, a private city and “special economic zone” in Roatán, Honduras, where a clinic sells unproven stem-cell and gene therapies, among others.
Many scientists have cautioned against the use of such “offshore” clinics. Even when it comes to Montana, scientists, bioethicists, and health law experts will caution that phase I clinical trials don’t prove a drug is safe. And they certainly don’t prove a drug’s efficacy, either.
When I spoke to Aaron Kesselheim, a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School with expertise in health policy and drug regulation, about the Montana law earlier this week, he made his concerns clear. “Patients who want these kinds of treatments deserve them to be rigorously assessed so that [they] can better understand what they’re getting themselves into, and what they’re paying their hard-earned money for.”
But DeVault pushes back on these arguments. “I’m a full-grown human being,” he says. “I’m capable of going to Vegas right now … blowing it all on the poker table, [or] I can go to the gun shop and buy a silenced [semi-automatic rifle] … how come I can’t make a decision to purchase a potential treatment that might change the entire trajectory of my son’s life?”
This article first appeared in The Checkup, MIT Technology Review’s weekly biotech newsletter. To receive it in your inbox every Thursday, and read articles like this first, sign up here.
Deep Dive
Biotechnology and health
The “steroid olympics” were a circus—and a window into our culture
Dozens of athletes on performance-enhancing drugs competed in the Enhanced Games. Organizers hope it'll sell a lot of peptides and other supplements.
Sperm donors need limits, says a European fertility group
Some donor-conceived people are finding hundreds of siblings. An international cap on donations could help prevent that.
Inside interoception: The hidden sense of how you feel inside
Researchers are decoding how signals move between body and brain, with implications for how we understand and treat conditions from obesity to anxiety.
David Sinclair plans to test whole-body rejuvenation drugs in the XPrize competition
The next step in the youth quest is a technology called chemical reprogramming.
Stay connected
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.
Facts Only
Brody DeVault was born in March 2023.
Brody DeVault is diagnosed with creatine transporter deficiency (CTD).
Ceres Brain Therapeutics is developing a nasal spray drug to deliver creatine to the brain.
The Ceres drug has been tested in mice and in a phase I clinical trial with 48 healthy adult volunteers.
The Ceres drug has not been tested in children or people with CTD.
Montana's "right to try" law was established in 2015 for terminally ill patients.
A 2023 Montana law expanded "right to try" access to non-terminally ill people for drugs that completed phase I trials.
Montana's Department of Health and Human Services finalized rules for clinics administering these treatments last weekend.
An experimental treatment review board (ETRB) was established in Montana to review applications.
Próspera is a private city in Roatán, Honduras, with a clinic selling unproven stem-cell and gene therapies.
Executive Summary
Brody DeVault, a three-year-old with the rare genetic condition creatine transporter deficiency (CTD), lacks a curative treatment. His father is seeking access to an experimental nasal spray developed by Ceres Brain Therapeutics. While the drug has shown promise in mice and safety in a small group of healthy adults, it has not yet been tested in children or individuals with CTD. Standard FDA expanded access is unavailable because the drug is not registered with the FDA and its manufacturing does not meet FDA regulations.
A recent expansion of Montana's "right to try" laws theoretically allows non-terminally ill patients to access drugs that have passed phase I trials via an experimental treatment review board. However, the developer, Ceres, expresses hesitation due to potential regulatory friction with the FDA. This has led the family to consider "offshore" clinics in Honduras. Medical experts and bioethicists warn that phase I trials do not establish efficacy or long-term safety, while the parents argue for the right to assume these risks to potentially alter their child's developmental trajectory.
Full Take
The strongest version of this narrative is a clash between the "precautionary principle" of institutional medicine and the "right to gamble" held by desperate parents. It pits the slow, rigorous safety standards of the FDA against the biological urgency of a child's neuroplasticity window.
The narrative relies heavily on the emotional weight of a child's suffering to frame the regulatory hurdles not as safety guardrails, but as bureaucratic barriers to a "one shot" salvation. By juxtaposing the ability to gamble in Vegas or buy a firearm with the inability to buy an unproven drug, the argument shifts from a medical safety debate to a civil liberties debate regarding bodily autonomy and parental rights.
The root cause is the systemic gap between the pace of biotechnological innovation and the pace of regulatory approval. This echoes the historical tension between "compassionate use" and clinical rigor. The implication is a growing "regulatory arbitrage" where wealthy or desperate patients bypass national laws to seek care in special economic zones or states with laxer oversight, potentially creating a two-tiered system of medical risk.
Patterns detected: none
If this were a coordinated influence campaign, the playbook would involve "weaponizing a tragedy" to lobby for the total deregulation of the pharmaceutical industry, using a single sympathetic case to invalidate the entire phase-testing process. The actual content does not match this; it maintains a balance by including expert warnings and the drug developer's own caution.
Bridge Questions:
1. At what point does a parent's right to choose a treatment infringe upon a child's right to be protected from unsafe medical experimentation?
2. If "right to try" laws proliferate, will biotech companies be less incentivized to complete rigorous phase II and III trials?
3. How should society balance the "plasticity window" of a developing brain against the risk of permanent harm from an unproven substance?
Sentinel — Human
The text is primarily a human-written feature piece that uses a personal medical crisis to explore complex legal and ethical questions surrounding experimental treatments.
