- Published
Social media giant Meta has agreed to a $18bn (£13.3bn) settlement with US states and territories to resolve claims that Facebook and Instagram harmed children.
A California judge approved the settlement, which Meta must pay to 48 states, plus the District of Columbia and three US territories, marking the company's largest payment over child safety litigation to date.
Meta will also implement a host of changes aimed at better protecting kids online, which the states had demanded, including default daily time limits and night-time blocks.
"This is a major moment to clean up an industry that has been hurting our kids," California Attorney General Rob Bonta said.
Meta has denied any wrongdoing as part of the settlement and said on Wednesday that the payment it agreed to "will be distributed in annual instalments over a 10-year period".
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers approved the settlement, writing that it "reflects a fair, reasonable, comprehensive, and good faith approach not only to provide monetary relief, but importantly, to change conduct in a way that attempts to meaningfully address the negative impacts of the social media platforms at issue".
Meta's $18bn settlement may hasten reckoning for social media on child safety
- Published8 hours ago
While the settlement includes almost the entire US, the initial lawsuit was filed in 2023 by 29 states accusing the company of numerous violations of federal and state child privacy laws.
One of the states that was not part of the settlement was New Mexico.
Last month, a federal judge there handed down a historic ruling against Meta, finding it to be a "public nuisance" on par with air pollution and ordering it to pay combined fines of almost $1bn.
As a jury trial kicked off last week in an Oakland, California, federal court, state lawyers argued the tech company knew that millions of 11- and 12-year-old users were on Instagram and Facebook over the years, yet "did little to keep them off" the platforms.
Although the trial had only gone on for five days, state lawyers relied heavily on information found in millions of internal Meta documents provided in the case. They included internal research, employee emails, and chat logs that went all the way up to chief executive Mark Zuckerberg.
One piece of internal research on Instagram stated: "Teens have an addict's narrative about use." Still, the states argued, Meta targeted young users.
"The trial did not go well for Meta," Bonta said on Wednesday.
Meta maintained throughout the brief trial that it had worked extensively over the years to make its platforms safer for its youngest users, pouring resources into testing and research, and building new features.
"We're always working on teen safety," head of Instagram Adam Mosseri said during an hour of court testimony on Tuesday.
The case was settled and court adjourned before he could reappear before a jury.
Before Mosseri's testimony, a former researcher at Meta, George Volichenko, appeared and with lawyers went over various internal communications he had been a part of regarding Meta's work on safety.
Volichenko said he struggled to understand when he was at the company in 2022 why the team he worked on wasn't given more freedom to better test and implement new safety features.
One of those was "quiet mode", which muted notifications for teen users during the night. His team knew such a feature would be much more widely adopted if Meta turned it on by default.
He recalled his manager telling him he "shouldn't worry too much about the adoption figures being low, because the team exists partially to protect the company against the upcoming lawsuits".
As part of the Wednesday settlement, however, a feature called "night mode", which blocks notifications between midnight and 6am, will now be on by default - meaning they will be turned on automatically. The settings are also designed only to be turned off by a parent or guardian.
"The framework we've negotiated will empower parents to easily manage how their children access our platforms," CJ Mahoney, Meta's chief legal officer, said.
Other features for teen users being implemented as part of the deal include:
A default two-hour daily time limit (cumulative across Instagram and Facebook) that teens can only turn off with a parent's permission.
Likes will be hidden, on teens' profiles and those that they interact with.
"School mode", or a mute on notifications between 08:00 and 15:00 during school days.
Prompts noting when a teen has hit 15 minutes of continual use. Then notifications when cumulative use has hit 60 and 90 minutes.
The ability to choose a feed that is not driven by an algorithm.
The ability to turn off autoplay for videos and content.
Extreme make-up filters will no longer be accessible.
As for the new daily time limit for teen users, that will be reduced to one hour of total daily use should other social media platforms like TikTok, Snap and YouTube also agree to implement new restrictions for young users.
Bonta urged such platforms to do so, saying the settlement with Meta "is a good blueprint" for other companies to follow.
Should they not, he suggested on Wednesday that his office would now be "more focused" on bringing changes to the entire social media industry.
Meta also said TikTok and YouTube should implement the same safety features for their younger users.
"Our new Time Limit commitments, Night Mode features and usage limits during school hours set the right path forward for our whole industry, but this framework will only work if all our peers join us," Meta's Mahoney said.
YouTube and TikTok have been contacted for comment.
District of Columbia Attorney General Brian Schwalb called the Meta deal a "monumental public health victory".
He added: "The safety features Meta is required to install will fundamentally and immediately change how young people use Instagram and Facebook."
Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.
Facts Only
* Meta agreed to an $18 billion settlement with US states and territories regarding claims that Facebook and Instagram harmed children.
* A California judge approved the settlement.
* Meta must pay 48 states, the District of Columbia, and three US territories.
* The settlement includes implementing changes demanded by the states, such as default daily time limits and night-time blocks.
* The initial lawsuits were filed in 2023 by 29 states.
* A federal judge ruled against Meta in New Mexico, finding it a "public nuisance" and ordering fines of almost $1 billion.
* State lawyers argued that Meta knew millions of young users were on the platforms but did little to protect them during a trial.
* Internal Meta documents, including research and emails up to Mark Zuckerberg, were introduced in the case.
* A former Meta researcher indicated internal knowledge about features like "quiet mode" was intended to be adopted by default.
* The settlement includes default night mode blocking notifications between midnight and 6 am.
* Other features include a default two-hour daily time limit, hidden likes, school mode, usage prompts for cumulative time, an algorithmic-free feed choice, and autoplay controls.
* Meta stated that the new time limit for teens will be reduced to one hour if other platforms like TikTok, Snap, and YouTube agree to similar restrictions.
Executive Summary
Meta agreed to an $18 billion settlement with US states and territories to resolve claims that its platforms harmed children. A California judge approved the settlement, requiring Meta to pay 48 states, the District of Columbia, and three US territories. The agreement mandates changes aimed at child protection, including default daily time limits and night-time blocks. While Meta denied wrongdoing, they stated the payment will be distributed over ten years in annual installments.
The litigation originated from lawsuits filed by 29 states in 2023 accusing Facebook and Instagram of violating federal and state child privacy laws. During a subsequent federal court trial, state lawyers argued that the company knowingly exposed millions of young users to the platforms. Meta maintained that it had invested resources in safety testing and research.
The settlement mandates several specific changes for teen users, such as default nightly notification blocks ("night mode"), a two-hour daily time limit, hiding likes on profiles, school mode notifications, limits on continuous use prompts, and the removal of extreme make-up filters. Meta also called for TikTok and YouTube to adopt similar safety features.
Full Take
The structure of this resolution reveals a tension between corporate liability mitigation and genuine systemic reform. The settlement, framed as a monetary payout coupled with mandated behavioral changes, shifts the accountability mechanism from punitive legal action to enforced operational change. This moves beyond simple compensation into structural governance, acknowledging that past inaction has tangible societal consequences for minors.
The conflict arises from Meta's posture—denying wrongdoing while simultaneously implementing significant concessions demanded by the litigation process. The internal communications presented during the trial suggest a potential divergence between stated safety goals and actual product implementation timelines, specifically regarding features like "quiet mode." The framework negotiated now forces a reckoning where the perceived motivation for creating or deploying features must be re-evaluated against their documented impact on vulnerable users.
The call for industry-wide standardization—extending the settlement principles to TikTok and YouTube—points toward a pattern where regulatory success is contingent not just on punishing a single entity, but on establishing a new, enforceable baseline for an entire sector. The final stipulation regarding collective agreement for time limits suggests that true safety outcomes will be determined less by litigation victories and more by cross-industry consensus on infrastructural responsibility.
Bridge Questions: If the current framework succeeds in mandating behavioral changes, what mechanisms can ensure these operational parameters are continuously updated as platform technologies evolve? How does the establishment of peer-to-peer safety standards mitigate the risk that emerging platforms will adopt minimal compliance rather than substantive protection? What historical precedents exist for successfully embedding future safety mandates into corporate legal settlements across diverse technological domains?
Sentinel — Human
The article functions as a standard journalistic synthesis of complex legal and corporate developments, characterized by structured reporting rather than purely synthetic generation.
