The PJM Interconnection’s just-held capacity auction cleared nearly 7 GW below its reliability target and only drew roughly 500 MW of new power supply, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Chairman Laura Swett said Thursday.
“These numbers compound the alarm bells for a call to action in PJM,” Swett said during the agency’s monthly meeting.
“Am I surprised that PJM failed to deliver? No, I am not,” Swett said later during a media briefing.
However, FERC isn’t trying to “target” PJM, she said.
“This is a problem that involves people at the federal level, at the market level, the state level, the registered entities, the market participants … all the utilities, the companies there,” Swett said. “This is a very complex issue that everyone has to coalesce around, coming up with a solution.”
FERC aims to address some of the problems at a technical conference on July 23 focused on PJM’s governance issues.
“The current stakeholder process in PJM is slow where it must be fast, opaque where it must be transparent, and vulnerable to vetoes and agenda control exactly when the region needs immediate action,” Swett said.
From the conference, FERC expects to get “ideas on paper, on a record,” Swett said. “I am very optimistic that certain proposals will be front runners that are grounded in the record that we collect next week, so that there should be a more clear path forward for PJM after that.”
FERC Commissioner Lindsay See also highlighted the need for reforms at PJM, the nation’s largest grid operator, serving 67 million people in the Mid-Atlantic and Midwest regions.
“PJM has to be able to get reforms across the finish line in a timely and transparent way,” See said. “Part of that also includes the need for a governance structure that can not only deliver concrete results but that can give parties the type of confidence in those reforms that's necessary to drive investment where and when it's needed.”
Last week, FERC Commissioner David LaCerte said the status quo at PJM was “untenable.”
Here are five other takeaways from FERC’s meeting.
Data center reliability standards
FERC set deadlines for the North American Electric Reliability Corp. to develop reliability standards for computational loads — data centers and crypto-mining operations — and the rules for registering those loads by Dec. 31. The grid watchdog is already developing those standards and rules.
FERC also directed NERC to file by March 1 a plan detailing the next steps in its standards development process for computational loads.
“I applaud NERC's proactive efforts on these matters,” Swett said. FERC set the deadlines because “they are a great mechanism for producing results,” she said.
As part of its Large Loads Action Plan, NERC expects to issue the proposed reliability standards and draft registry criteria for public comment in August, it said Thursday.
FERC orders CAISO, SPP Western seams report
FERC ordered the California Independent System Operator and the Southwest Power Pool to file a report by Sept. 30 on how they plan to manage the seams between their markets and neighboring balancing authority areas in the West. The CAISO-run Extended Day-Ahead Market started operating in May. SPP expanded its footprint into the Western Interconnection in April, and its Markets+ initiative is expected to go live in October 2027.
“While the increased deployment of organized markets is intended to bring substantial reliability and economic benefits to the West, the resulting seams create reliability, operational, and market efficiency hurdles that warrant proactive attention,” FERC said.
Earlier this month, CAISO President and CEO Elliot Mainzer said the grid operator was working with SPP to develop a joint operating agreement before Markets+ begins operating.
Complaint over PSE&G cost recovery advances
FERC advanced a complaint over Public Service Electric and Gas Co.’s cost recovery of a $546 million transmission project it built in New Jersey. The agency ordered an administrative law judge to conduct hearings on Public Citizen’s January complaint alleging that the costs were imprudently incurred.
In December 2024, PSE&G agreed to pay a $6.6 million fine to settle a FERC enforcement office investigation into the utility’s justifications to PJM for building the Roseland-Pleasant Valley transmission project.
FERC rejects complaint over Duke transmission rates
FERC rejected a complaint that sought to stop Duke Energy Progress from including the costs of four transmission lines that could benefit solar developers into its overall transmission rates.
The agency dismissed arguments made by North Carolina Electric Membership Corp. in its complaint, saying, “Rolled-in rate treatment for the costs of the four … projects is consistent with longstanding Commission precedent that favors rolled-in rate treatment for integrated transmission facilities.”
FERC eyes changes to ‘hypothetical capital structure’ incentive
FERC approved a 50/50 hypothetical debt to equity capital structure for two transmission projects that Basin Electric Power Cooperative plans to build in North Dakota for about $469.3 million. FERC offers hypothetical capital structures as an incentive for transmission development.
“They can help new transmission companies secure financing for large projects and allow developers to move forward even when their actual capital structure may not yet reflect a project's long-term financial profile,” Swett said.
However, FERC is considering changes to the incentive, which increases consumer costs, Swett said at the agency’s meeting.
“This is a very complex topic with significant implications for financing, project development, regional planning, and customer affordability. Even small changes to utilities' return can have significant impacts,” she said. “I am confident that working with my colleagues, we can get that balance right and ensure that our policies promote needed transmission investment while protecting consumers.”
Facts Only
* The PJM Interconnection’s capacity auction cleared nearly 7 GW below its reliability target.
* The auction drew approximately 500 MW of new power supply.
* FERC Chairman Laura Swett noted the numbers compounded alarm bells for action in PJM.
* FERC does not seek to "target" PJM but views it as a complex issue involving federal, market, state, and entity levels.
* FERC plans a technical conference on July 23 focused on PJM’s governance issues.
* The current stakeholder process in PJM is described as slow, opaque, and vulnerable to vetoes.
* FERC expects the conference to generate proposals for action.
* FERC Commissioner Lindsay See highlighted the need for PJM reforms in governance to ensure timely results and investment confidence.
* FERC set deadlines for NERC to develop reliability standards for computational loads (data centers and crypto-mining operations) and rules for registration by December 31.
* FERC directed NERC to file a plan detailing the next steps for computational load standards development by March 1.
* NERC expects to issue proposed reliability standards and draft registry criteria for public comment in August as part of its Large Loads Action Plan.
* FERC ordered CAISO and SPP to file a report by September 30 on managing market seams in the West.
* FERC advanced a complaint over PSE&G's cost recovery of a $546 million transmission project.
* FERC rejected a complaint seeking to stop Duke Energy Progress from including costs for four transmission lines into rates.
* FERC approved a 50/50 hypothetical debt-to-equity capital structure incentive for Basin Electric Power Cooperative projects.
Executive Summary
The PJM Interconnection’s recent capacity auction resulted in nearly 7 GW below its reliability target and secured only about 500 MW of new power supply, according to FERC Chairman Laura Swett. This outcome prompted a call for action within PJM, as the situation involves issues across federal, market, state, and registered entity levels. FERC plans to address PJM's governance issues through a technical conference on July 23. The goal is to move away from the current stakeholder process, which is criticized for being slow, opaque, and vulnerable to vetoes when immediate action is needed. FERC Commissioner Lindsay See emphasized the need for reforms in PJM's governance structure to ensure timely delivery of results and foster investment confidence.
Furthermore, FERC has set deadlines related to reliability standards for computational loads in the grid, directing NERC to develop standards and registration rules by specific dates. Other actions include ordering reports from CAISO and SPP regarding market seams in the West, advancing a complaint over PSE&G cost recovery, rejecting a complaint against Duke Energy regarding transmission rates, and approving hypothetical capital structure incentives for transmission development.
Full Take
The narrative surrounding PJM and FERC reveals a fundamental tension between real-world reliability deficits, the complexity of multi-stakeholder governance, and the pace required for systemic change. The immediate failure in capacity delivery suggests that existing administrative or procedural frameworks are insufficient to manage grid stability when rapid action is required. The frustration expressed by Swett regarding slow, opaque processes highlights a systemic bottleneck where necessary operational adjustments are delayed by governance structures that prioritize consensus over immediacy.
The pattern emerging is the attempt by a high-level federal body (FERC) to impose structured, time-bound mechanisms—technical conferences, mandated reports, and specific deadlines—onto a system (PJM) characterized by complex, decentralized stakeholder influence. This structure attempts to re-establish a clear path forward by grounding decisions in a formal record rather than reactive political maneuvering. However, the consideration of adjustments, such as altering hypothetical capital structure incentives, introduces another layer of complexity where technical efficiency must be balanced against the public interest and consumer affordability.
The implications for agency are that true reliability enhancement requires not just technical solutions but also robust, expedited governance structures capable of delivering confidence to drive necessary investment. The challenge lies in ensuring that the mechanisms designed to create transparency do not become new sources of delay or capture; the success hinges on whether these reforms can successfully shift power dynamics to ensure that operational needs are prioritized over procedural inertia.
Bridge Questions: If technical standards and deadlines are established, what specific governance tools must be implemented within PJM to ensure proposals are acted upon rapidly rather than simply documented? How can FERC measure the effectiveness of the proposed governance reforms in terms of realized reliability improvements versus process efficiency? What alternative accountability structures could mitigate the risk that complex incentives might unintentionally favor certain actors over broader regional stability?
