- Published
An investigation has been launched into whether TikTok is doing enough to keep children off its platform.
The probe by media regulator Ofcom comes a month after the UK government announced that under-16's would be banned entirely from a range of platforms.
Ofcom will examine how the video-sharing app assesses if a user is a child and whether it has adequate systems to prevent children from viewing harmful content.
"We're confident that we meet our Online Safety Act obligations and will work with Ofcom to demonstrate it," a TikTok spokesperson said.
It follows a review by regulator in May which criticised the platform for not being "safe enough" for children and called for stronger action on children's online safety.
Kate Davies, Ofcom's group director for strategy and research told BBC's Today programme: "This is where TikTok comes in. We found that some method of age checks being used by social media are not working well enough".
At the heart of the regulator's probe into the platform is its use of technology known as "age inference".
This essentially relies on estimating how old a user is based on how they use the platform, such as the videos they watch or others they interact with.
Davies said Ofcom had "serious doubts" over whether such tools are good enough at checking the age of users.
The regulator requires social media platforms, among others, to use "highly effective" methods to check users are old enough to use them and prevent children from seeing harmful material.
"We have very serious questions about whether age inference can be highly effective," she said.
But a TikTok spokesperson said: "We strictly enforce age-appropriate experiences through expert-informed platform rules and advanced age inference technologies, in line with major industry peers."
They said the company had invested "billions" in online safety since launching in the UK eight years ago.
Age check enforcement
Ofcom's review of TikTok's age checks are part of a broader clampdown on sites failing to prevent children encountering adult content, such as pornography, and other harmful material.
Under the Online Safety Act's (OSA) protection of children's codes, which took effect on 25 July last year, sites with such content must use methods such as face scans to check a UK visitor is over the age of 18.
But the regulator has since had to take action, including issuing large fines, against dozens of adult sites over suspected or proven non-compliance.
Its investigation into TikTok shows scrutiny is now being stepped up for social media sites.
TikTok is not alone in using so-called age inference tech, with Instagram also deploying it among other methods to identify where a person might be a child lying about their age.
The platform says UK users are placed into an age-appropriate experience for under-18s by default until they are understood to be an adult.
It says people who fail to enter a date of birth that puts them over the age of 13 when they create an account are prohibited from making a new one, for instance by trying to enter a different date of birth.
Further questions
Andy Burrows, chief executive of the Molly Rose Foundation (MRF), welcomed Ofcom's investigation.
He criticised TikTok for what he called "egregious failures" to prevent children from "being exposed to a tsunami of harmful content".
The charity, set up by the family of Molly Russell - who took her own life at the age of 14 after viewing self-harm and suicide content on social media - cited its own research which found many teens were seeing high-risk content on TikTok.
But Burrows said any investigation must also deal with the site's "blatant failure to clean up its toxic algorithms and comply with child safety duties".
The BBC has approached TikTok for a response.
Rebecca Smart, criminal lawyer and online safety expert at law firm Payne Hicks Beach, said the OSA had clearly "made some headway" in protecting children.
But she said "the current enforcement regime may not provide a strong enough deterrent to drive full compliance".
"There should be severe penalties for services that do not have appropriate age checks in place to protect these children," she said.
"Without stronger accountability and enforcement, children will remain vulnerable to online harms that the OSA was designed to prevent."
Related topics
- Published24 July 2025
- Published21 May
- Published3 days ago
Facts Only
Ofcom has launched an investigation into TikTok's age verification processes.
The UK government announced a total ban on platforms for under-16s one month prior to the probe.
Ofcom is examining TikTok's "age inference" technology, which estimates user age based on platform behavior and interactions.
The Online Safety Act's protection of children's codes took effect on July 25 last year.
Sites with adult content are required under the Act to use methods such as face scans for users over 18.
Ofcom has issued fines to dozens of adult sites for non-compliance.
Instagram also utilizes age inference technology to identify children.
TikTok states it prohibits users from creating accounts if they enter a date of birth indicating they are under 13.
The Molly Rose Foundation reports that teens encounter high-risk content on TikTok.
TikTok claims to have invested billions in online safety over the last eight years.
Executive Summary
Ofcom is investigating whether TikTok's age verification systems are sufficient to protect children from harmful content, specifically scrutinizing the "age inference" technology used to estimate user age via behavioral patterns. This action follows a May review where the regulator deemed the platform "not safe enough" and coincides with a broader UK regulatory crackdown on adult content accessibility under the Online Safety Act.
TikTok maintains that its systems are expert-informed, aligned with industry peers, and compliant with legal obligations. Conversely, advocacy groups like the Molly Rose Foundation argue that the platform has failed to prevent the spread of high-risk content and toxic algorithms. While some legal experts suggest the Online Safety Act is making progress, there are concerns that current enforcement and penalties may not be severe enough to ensure full corporate compliance. The outcome remains uncertain as the regulator weighs the effectiveness of behavioral estimation against more stringent methods like face scanning.
Full Take
The strongest version of this narrative is that the UK is transitioning from a "self-regulation" era of social media to a "hard enforcement" era, where behavioral guesses (age inference) are no longer legally acceptable substitutes for hard verification.
The tension here lies in the clash between two paradigms: the "frictionless" user experience championed by Big Tech and the "protective" barrier demanded by regulators. The root cause is a fundamental disagreement over the definition of "highly effective" verification. TikTok views industry-standard behavioral analysis as sufficient, while Ofcom suggests that if a system can be bypassed by a child lying about their birthdate, it is inherently ineffective.
This situation implies a significant shift in digital agency. As platforms move toward face scans and government-mandated IDs to satisfy regulators, the anonymity of the internet further erodes. The benefit is a reduction in child exposure to harm; the cost is a normalized infrastructure of surveillance for all users.
Patterns detected: none
If this were a coordinated influence campaign, the playbook would involve amplifying the tragedy of a single individual to trigger a moral panic, thereby bypassing technical debate in favor of immediate, restrictive legislation. The current reporting mentions the Molly Rose Foundation to provide emotional weight, but it balances this by including TikTok's corporate defense and the legal framework of the Online Safety Act. The content remains a standard report on regulatory friction.
Bridge Questions:
1. Does the move toward "hard" age verification (e.g., face scans) create new privacy risks that outweigh the safety benefits?
2. If age inference is deemed ineffective, what is the baseline for a "highly effective" method that doesn't compromise user anonymity?
3. To what extent is the focus on age checks a distraction from the more complex issue of algorithmic amplification of harmful content?
Sentinel — Human
The article is a report synthesizing public statements from regulators, the platform, and legal experts regarding TikTok's age verification practices, demonstrating a structure common in human-led journalistic analysis.