Officials in New Mexico, the nation’s largest historic producer of uranium ore, banned new leasing of state lands for uranium mining on Friday.
State Land Commissioner Stephanie Garcia Richard signed the executive order at a press conference in Sante Fe as the Trump administration seeks to revive American uranium mining and rebuild a domestic supply chain for nuclear fuel.
“Today we get to say something our fathers were never given the opportunity to say,” said state Sen. Angel Charley, the daughter of a uranium miner. “No community in New Mexico should have to sacrifice its people, its water and its land, so someone else can make a profit.”
New Mexico, home to hundreds of abandoned uranium shaft mines, has two active uranium leases but no active mines. Trump administration officials have pushed for uranium mining on federal lands, including national forests in New Mexico, and added one to its fast-tracking program.
“Increasing the domestic production of uranium is critical to national security and energy dominance,” said Emily Domenech, executive director of the federal Permitting Council, in a press release this summer.
New uranium mines are humming in Wyoming, Arizona and Texas, with dozens more queued to re-open, according to reporting by Inside Climate News. In New Mexico, Australian miner Laramide Resources and Colorado-based Energy Fuels aim to begin producing uranium next year. The order signed by Garcia Richard on Friday doesn’t stop uranium mines from moving forward on federal land within the state. Nor does it stop any active leases, of which there are two, in the state. But it does signal the office’s position on uranium mining, Garcia Richard said, and prevents any new mines from moving forward.
“The Trump administration is aggressively seeking to promote new domestic uranium production,” the executive order said.
The U.S. ceased large-scale uranium production decades ago when it stopped building nuclear reactors and shifted fuel supply chains to foreign sources. The remnants of the mining industry in the Four Corners region, the epicenter of U.S. uranium production, have caused generations of health impacts and environmental pollution, including in the community of Laguna where Charley grew up.
“When the uranium companies were done, they got to leave,” Charley said. “We don’t.”
New Mexico is home to the largest spill of radioactive material in U.S. history: a 1979 tailings dam collapse that spilled 94 million gallons of radioactive water and 1,100 tons of uranium waste across portions of New Mexico, Arizona and the Navajo Nation. The state is also home to the Trinity Site, where the first atomic bomb was tested. Nearby communities, mainly tribal reservations, continue to face health impacts from both being downwind of the test sites and exposed to the mining operations.
“This order banning new uranium mining on state lands is a critical step toward ensuring we don’t worsen the deadly legacy uranium mining has already left across the Four Corners region,” said Taylor McKinnon, Southwest director for the Center for Biological Diversity, in a statement on Friday. “It’s long past time to proactively protect people, water, land and biodiversity.”
Last year the Trump administration added uranium to its list of high-priority mining products for national security. Successive federal administrations have sought to rebuild supply chains for nuclear fuel, especially since the 2024 prohibition of Russian uranium imports.
Among its policy priorities, the New Mexico Chamber of Commerce lists: “Encouragement of New Mexico’s unique ability to contribute to, and benefit from, the nuclear fuel cycle through uranium mining.”
About This Story
Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.
That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.
Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.
Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?
Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.
Thank you,
Facts Only
* Officials in New Mexico banned new leasing of state lands for uranium mining on Friday.
* State Land Commissioner Stephanie Garcia Richard signed the executive order.
* The action is part of an effort by the Trump administration to revive American uranium mining and rebuild a domestic supply chain for nuclear fuel.
* State Senator Angel Charley stated no community should sacrifice its people, water, and land for profit regarding mining.
* New Mexico has hundreds of abandoned uranium shaft mines.
* New Mexico currently has two active uranium leases but no active mines.
* The Trump administration officials pushed for uranium mining on federal lands, including national forests in New Mexico.
* Uranium mines are operating in Wyoming, Arizona, and Texas.
* Australian miner Laramide Resources and Energy Fuels aim to begin producing uranium in New Mexico next year.
* The order stops new uranium mines from moving forward on state lands.
Executive Summary
Officials in New Mexico banned new leasing of state lands for uranium mining on Friday. This executive order was signed as part of the Trump administration's effort to revive American uranium mining and rebuild a domestic supply chain for nuclear fuel. State Senator Angel Charley stated that no community in New Mexico should have to sacrifice its people, water, and land for profit.
The action follows a push by the Trump administration to promote uranium mining on federal lands, including national forests in New Mexico. The order does not stop existing uranium leases or active mines within the state but prevents any new ones from moving forward. This development occurs as other regions, such as Wyoming, Arizona, and Texas, are seeing new uranium mines begin production, with others aiming to reopen queued sites.
Full Take
The action taken by New Mexico officials signals a specific boundary regarding resource extraction, framed as an effort to mitigate historical environmental damage while simultaneously supporting a broader national energy security narrative championed by the administration. The core tension lies between prioritizing immediate local protections against legacy harms—such as past radioactive spills and health impacts in the Four Corners region—and the federal push for domestic uranium production, which seeks to address current supply chain vulnerabilities, particularly following geopolitical shifts like the prohibition of Russian imports.
The shift from permitting new state-land leases reflects a prioritization strategy: attempting to halt expansion while acknowledging existing legal frameworks remain in place concerning established leases. This creates a dynamic where local environmental and community concerns are positioned against large-scale national energy and security objectives. The history of uranium mining, marked by severe environmental pollution, such as the 1979 tailings dam collapse and proximity to the Trinity Site, provides a strong context for why communities view land protection as paramount. The move suggests a recognition that simply allowing new development does not resolve past injustices; therefore, establishing a regulatory barrier on state lands is being presented as a necessary step in proactively managing the deadly legacy of mining activities across the region.
What alternative frameworks could balance the imperative for domestic energy supply with robust, preemptive environmental stewardship that addresses historical contamination? How can policy be constructed to ensure that appeals for national security and supply chain resilience are integrated without subordinating fundamental rights concerning water, land, and community health at the local level?
Sentinel — Human
LIKELY_HUMAN (confidence: 0.35)
